糖尿病悖论:2型糖尿病患者的骨密度与骨折

Sonsoles Botella Martínez , Nerea Varo Cenarruzabeitia , Javier Escalada San Martin , Amparo Calleja Canelas
{"title":"糖尿病悖论:2型糖尿病患者的骨密度与骨折","authors":"Sonsoles Botella Martínez ,&nbsp;Nerea Varo Cenarruzabeitia ,&nbsp;Javier Escalada San Martin ,&nbsp;Amparo Calleja Canelas","doi":"10.1016/j.endoen.2016.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence and morbidity are increasing. Osteoporotic fractures are among the ‘non-classical’ complications of diabetes and been overlooked for a long time, maybe because of their complex diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The usual tools for preventing fragility fractures (such as the fracture risk assessment tool and bone densitometry) underestimate risk of fractures in type 2 diabetic patients. New techniques, such as trabecular bone score or bone turnover markers, could be useful, but greater scientific evidence is required to recommend their use in clinical practice. The special characteristics of their pathophysiology result in decreased bone remodeling with normal or even increased bone mineral density, but with low quality. These changes lead to the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures without evidence of densitometric changes, which could be called ‘the diabetic paradox’.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48670,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinologia Y Nutricion","volume":"63 9","pages":"Pages 495-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endoen.2016.10.010","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diabetic paradox: Bone mineral density and fracture in type 2 diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Sonsoles Botella Martínez ,&nbsp;Nerea Varo Cenarruzabeitia ,&nbsp;Javier Escalada San Martin ,&nbsp;Amparo Calleja Canelas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.endoen.2016.10.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence and morbidity are increasing. Osteoporotic fractures are among the ‘non-classical’ complications of diabetes and been overlooked for a long time, maybe because of their complex diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The usual tools for preventing fragility fractures (such as the fracture risk assessment tool and bone densitometry) underestimate risk of fractures in type 2 diabetic patients. New techniques, such as trabecular bone score or bone turnover markers, could be useful, but greater scientific evidence is required to recommend their use in clinical practice. The special characteristics of their pathophysiology result in decreased bone remodeling with normal or even increased bone mineral density, but with low quality. These changes lead to the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures without evidence of densitometric changes, which could be called ‘the diabetic paradox’.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinologia Y Nutricion\",\"volume\":\"63 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 495-501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endoen.2016.10.010\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinologia Y Nutricion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173509316301076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinologia Y Nutricion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173509316301076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

2型糖尿病的患病率和发病率正在增加。骨质疏松性骨折是糖尿病的“非经典”并发症之一,长期以来一直被忽视,可能是因为其复杂的诊断和治疗方法。预防脆性骨折的常用工具(如骨折风险评估工具和骨密度计)低估了2型糖尿病患者骨折的风险。新技术,如骨小梁评分或骨转换标记物,可能是有用的,但需要更多的科学证据来推荐它们在临床实践中的应用。其病理生理学的特殊特征导致骨重塑减少,骨密度正常甚至增加,但质量较低。这些变化导致骨质疏松性骨折的发生,而没有密度测定变化的证据,这可以被称为“糖尿病悖论”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The diabetic paradox: Bone mineral density and fracture in type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence and morbidity are increasing. Osteoporotic fractures are among the ‘non-classical’ complications of diabetes and been overlooked for a long time, maybe because of their complex diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The usual tools for preventing fragility fractures (such as the fracture risk assessment tool and bone densitometry) underestimate risk of fractures in type 2 diabetic patients. New techniques, such as trabecular bone score or bone turnover markers, could be useful, but greater scientific evidence is required to recommend their use in clinical practice. The special characteristics of their pathophysiology result in decreased bone remodeling with normal or even increased bone mineral density, but with low quality. These changes lead to the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures without evidence of densitometric changes, which could be called ‘the diabetic paradox’.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bariatric surgery results in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy Venlafaxine drug interaction in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with other oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Cardiovascular risk factors in scholars (RIVACANGAS) Endocrinology, diabetes and nutrition: The future is here
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1