社会复杂干预发展的方案方法

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2000-11-23 DOI:10.1002/1099-176X(200006)3:2<113::AID-MHP75>3.0.CO;2-H
Wayne S. Fenton
{"title":"社会复杂干预发展的方案方法","authors":"Wayne S. Fenton","doi":"10.1002/1099-176X(200006)3:2<113::AID-MHP75>3.0.CO;2-H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>First used in psychiatry to study pharmacological treatments, the randomized controlled trial provides the most powerful test of the relative effectiveness of two or more interventions. Applying RCT methodology to socially complex service interventions, however, presents unique challenges that derive from difficulties in treatment standardization, attaining study sample equivalence and controlling for environmental variations. These challenges can be managed when intervention development proceeds along a programmatic trajectory that spans discovery, development, efficacy, effectiveness and practice research. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"3 2","pages":"113-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-176X(200006)3:2<113::AID-MHP75>3.0.CO;2-H","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A programmatic approach to socially complex intervention development\",\"authors\":\"Wayne S. Fenton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1099-176X(200006)3:2<113::AID-MHP75>3.0.CO;2-H\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>First used in psychiatry to study pharmacological treatments, the randomized controlled trial provides the most powerful test of the relative effectiveness of two or more interventions. Applying RCT methodology to socially complex service interventions, however, presents unique challenges that derive from difficulties in treatment standardization, attaining study sample equivalence and controlling for environmental variations. These challenges can be managed when intervention development proceeds along a programmatic trajectory that spans discovery, development, efficacy, effectiveness and practice research. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"113-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-176X(200006)3:2<113::AID-MHP75>3.0.CO;2-H\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1099-176X%28200006%293%3A2%3C113%3A%3AAID-MHP75%3E3.0.CO%3B2-H\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1099-176X%28200006%293%3A2%3C113%3A%3AAID-MHP75%3E3.0.CO%3B2-H","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

该随机对照试验首次用于精神病学研究药物治疗,为两种或多种干预措施的相对有效性提供了最有力的测试。然而,将随机对照试验方法应用于社会复杂的服务干预,带来了独特的挑战,这些挑战源于治疗标准化、实现研究样本等效性和控制环境变化方面的困难。当干预发展沿着跨越发现、发展、疗效、有效性和实践研究的计划轨迹进行时,可以应对这些挑战。版权所有©2000 John Wiley&;有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A programmatic approach to socially complex intervention development

First used in psychiatry to study pharmacological treatments, the randomized controlled trial provides the most powerful test of the relative effectiveness of two or more interventions. Applying RCT methodology to socially complex service interventions, however, presents unique challenges that derive from difficulties in treatment standardization, attaining study sample equivalence and controlling for environmental variations. These challenges can be managed when intervention development proceeds along a programmatic trajectory that spans discovery, development, efficacy, effectiveness and practice research. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Preventive Parent Training for Early Childhood Disruptive Behaviour. Mental Health Expenditure in Canada. Relationship of Cryptocurrency Trading to Quality of Life, Sleep and Stress Levels in Academics Maternal Depression and Physical Health of Under-Five Children in Turkey. PERSPECTIVE: A Fireside Chat about Global Mental Health with Dr. Esther Duflo, Nobel Laureate in Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1