移动增强的早产儿家庭综合护理:护士和医生对实施的看法。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000001117
Linda S Franck, Christine Hodgson, Caryl L Gay, Robin Bisgaard, Diana M Cormier, Priscilla Joe, Brittany Lothe, Yao Sun
{"title":"移动增强的早产儿家庭综合护理:护士和医生对实施的看法。","authors":"Linda S Franck, Christine Hodgson, Caryl L Gay, Robin Bisgaard, Diana M Cormier, Priscilla Joe, Brittany Lothe, Yao Sun","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mobile-enhanced family-integrated care (mFICare) model addresses inconsistencies in family-centered care (FCC) delivery, with an evidence-based bundle of staff training, parent participation in rounds, parent classes, parent peer mentors, expanded role for parents in infant caregiving, and a parent-designed app.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our aim was to explore the views of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurses and physicians about mFICare implementation, including what worked well and what could be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a larger study to compare mFICare with FCC, we invited registered nurses, nurse practitioners, and fellow and attending physicians at the 3 study sites to participate in a survey about mFICare implementation. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the 182 respondents with experience delivering mFICare positively rated parent-led rounds, parent classes, parent skills acquisition, and the nurse-family relationship resulting from participation in mFICare. Respondents were less familiar or neutral regarding the parent peer mentor and app components of mFICare. Most respondents agreed that the mFICare program improved parent empowerment, and they shared suggestions for optimizing implementation. Physicians experienced more challenges with parent participation in rounds than nurses. Three themes emerged from the free-text data related to emotional support for parents, communication between staff and parents, and the unique experiences of families receiving mFICare.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>The mFICare program was overall acceptable to nurses and physicians, and areas for improvement were identified. With implementation refinement, mFICare can become a sustainable model to enhance delivery of FCC in NICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":"565-574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile-Enhanced Family-Integrated Care for Preterm Infants: Nurse and Physician Views About Implementation.\",\"authors\":\"Linda S Franck, Christine Hodgson, Caryl L Gay, Robin Bisgaard, Diana M Cormier, Priscilla Joe, Brittany Lothe, Yao Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mobile-enhanced family-integrated care (mFICare) model addresses inconsistencies in family-centered care (FCC) delivery, with an evidence-based bundle of staff training, parent participation in rounds, parent classes, parent peer mentors, expanded role for parents in infant caregiving, and a parent-designed app.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our aim was to explore the views of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurses and physicians about mFICare implementation, including what worked well and what could be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a larger study to compare mFICare with FCC, we invited registered nurses, nurse practitioners, and fellow and attending physicians at the 3 study sites to participate in a survey about mFICare implementation. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the 182 respondents with experience delivering mFICare positively rated parent-led rounds, parent classes, parent skills acquisition, and the nurse-family relationship resulting from participation in mFICare. Respondents were less familiar or neutral regarding the parent peer mentor and app components of mFICare. Most respondents agreed that the mFICare program improved parent empowerment, and they shared suggestions for optimizing implementation. Physicians experienced more challenges with parent participation in rounds than nurses. Three themes emerged from the free-text data related to emotional support for parents, communication between staff and parents, and the unique experiences of families receiving mFICare.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>The mFICare program was overall acceptable to nurses and physicians, and areas for improvement were identified. With implementation refinement, mFICare can become a sustainable model to enhance delivery of FCC in NICUs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Neonatal Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"565-574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Neonatal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:移动增强型家庭综合护理(mFICare)模式解决了以家庭为中心的护理(FCC)提供中的不一致问题,包括基于证据的员工培训、家长参与查房、家长课堂、家长同伴导师、扩大家长在婴儿护理中的作用,以及家长设计的应用程序。目的:我们的目的是探讨新生儿重症监护室(NICU)护士和医生对mFICare实施的看法,包括哪些效果良好,哪些可以改进。方法:作为将mFICare与FCC进行比较的大型研究的一部分,我们邀请了3个研究地点的注册护士、执业护士、同事和主治医生参与一项关于mFICare实施情况的调查。数据分析采用描述性统计和专题分析。结果:在182名有实施mFICare经验的受访者中,大多数人对家长主导的查房、家长课堂、家长技能习得以及参与mFICare所产生的护士家庭关系给予了积极评价。受访者对mFICare的父母同伴导师和应用程序组件不太熟悉或持中立态度。大多数受访者都认为mFICare计划改善了家长赋权,并分享了优化实施的建议。与护士相比,医生在家长参与查房方面遇到了更多的挑战。自由文本数据中出现了三个主题,涉及对父母的情感支持、工作人员和父母之间的沟通,以及接受mFICare的家庭的独特经历。对实践和研究的影响:mFICare计划总体上为护士和医生所接受,并确定了需要改进的领域。随着实施的改进,mFICare可以成为一种可持续的模式,以提高新生儿重症监护室中FCC的交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mobile-Enhanced Family-Integrated Care for Preterm Infants: Nurse and Physician Views About Implementation.

Background: The mobile-enhanced family-integrated care (mFICare) model addresses inconsistencies in family-centered care (FCC) delivery, with an evidence-based bundle of staff training, parent participation in rounds, parent classes, parent peer mentors, expanded role for parents in infant caregiving, and a parent-designed app.

Purpose: Our aim was to explore the views of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurses and physicians about mFICare implementation, including what worked well and what could be improved.

Methods: As part of a larger study to compare mFICare with FCC, we invited registered nurses, nurse practitioners, and fellow and attending physicians at the 3 study sites to participate in a survey about mFICare implementation. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results: The majority of the 182 respondents with experience delivering mFICare positively rated parent-led rounds, parent classes, parent skills acquisition, and the nurse-family relationship resulting from participation in mFICare. Respondents were less familiar or neutral regarding the parent peer mentor and app components of mFICare. Most respondents agreed that the mFICare program improved parent empowerment, and they shared suggestions for optimizing implementation. Physicians experienced more challenges with parent participation in rounds than nurses. Three themes emerged from the free-text data related to emotional support for parents, communication between staff and parents, and the unique experiences of families receiving mFICare.

Implications for practice and research: The mFICare program was overall acceptable to nurses and physicians, and areas for improvement were identified. With implementation refinement, mFICare can become a sustainable model to enhance delivery of FCC in NICUs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
期刊最新文献
A Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Unplanned Extubations in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Confronting Adversity: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Impacted Receiving Difficult News in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Effectiveness of a Novel Feeding Algorithm for Oral Feeding Transition of Infants Born Prematurely. Meta-Analysis of eVisit Technology on Psychological Anxiety and Factors Influencing the Parents of NICU Newborns. Developing and Validating a Multimodal Dataset for Neonatal Pain Assessment to Improve AI Algorithms With Clinical Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1