人性清单:发展和验证非人性化倾向的个体差异测量

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-13 DOI:10.1002/jts5.114
Dorottya Lantos, Lasana T. Harris
{"title":"人性清单:发展和验证非人性化倾向的个体差异测量","authors":"Dorottya Lantos,&nbsp;Lasana T. Harris","doi":"10.1002/jts5.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dehumanization is often explored in the context of inhumane acts of intergroup and interpersonal violence, and is considered a precursor to extreme atrocities. However, research suggests that we may all engage dehumanized perceptions, at least occasionally, if the social context or goals encourage dehumanization. This implies an individual difference nature of dehumanization propensity. Across four online studies (cross-sectional Studies 1, 3, 4, and longitudinal Study 2), we develop and validate the Humanity Inventory (HumIn), a self-report measure of individual differences in the propensity to engage dehumanization. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 86) entailed item selection. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 235) examined the validity of the scale and investigated its test–retest reliability. Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 259) compared the HumIn with pre-existing scales measuring related constructs. Study 4 (<i>N</i> = 98) examined the scale's performance in a situational example of dehumanization. Across all studies, the HumIn performs admirably, showing excellent reliability and validity. This novel instrument and broader conceptualization of dehumanization propensity should allow researchers to tackle questions related to dehumanization from a novel perspective, and will aid future research by providing a tool for assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 4","pages":"502-518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.114","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The humanity inventory: Developing and validating an individual difference measure of dehumanization propensity\",\"authors\":\"Dorottya Lantos,&nbsp;Lasana T. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts5.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dehumanization is often explored in the context of inhumane acts of intergroup and interpersonal violence, and is considered a precursor to extreme atrocities. However, research suggests that we may all engage dehumanized perceptions, at least occasionally, if the social context or goals encourage dehumanization. This implies an individual difference nature of dehumanization propensity. Across four online studies (cross-sectional Studies 1, 3, 4, and longitudinal Study 2), we develop and validate the Humanity Inventory (HumIn), a self-report measure of individual differences in the propensity to engage dehumanization. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 86) entailed item selection. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 235) examined the validity of the scale and investigated its test–retest reliability. Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 259) compared the HumIn with pre-existing scales measuring related constructs. Study 4 (<i>N</i> = 98) examined the scale's performance in a situational example of dehumanization. Across all studies, the HumIn performs admirably, showing excellent reliability and validity. This novel instrument and broader conceptualization of dehumanization propensity should allow researchers to tackle questions related to dehumanization from a novel perspective, and will aid future research by providing a tool for assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"502-518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.114\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

去人性化经常在群体间和人际暴力的不人道行为的背景下进行探讨,并被认为是极端暴行的前兆。然而,研究表明,如果社会背景或目标鼓励非人化,我们都可能参与非人化的感知,至少偶尔会这样。这意味着非人性化倾向的个体差异性。在四项在线研究(横断面研究1、3、4和纵向研究2)中,我们开发并验证了人性清单(HumIn),这是一种自我报告的非人性化倾向个体差异的测量方法。研究1(N=86)涉及项目选择。研究2(N=235)检验了量表的有效性,并调查了其测试-再测试的可靠性。研究3(N=259)将HumIn与先前存在的测量相关结构的量表进行了比较。研究4(N=98)考察了该量表在非人性化情境示例中的表现。在所有的研究中,HumIn的表现令人钦佩,显示出卓越的可靠性和有效性。这种新颖的工具和对非人性化倾向的更广泛概念化应该使研究人员能够从新颖的角度解决与非人性化相关的问题,并将通过提供评估工具来帮助未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The humanity inventory: Developing and validating an individual difference measure of dehumanization propensity

Dehumanization is often explored in the context of inhumane acts of intergroup and interpersonal violence, and is considered a precursor to extreme atrocities. However, research suggests that we may all engage dehumanized perceptions, at least occasionally, if the social context or goals encourage dehumanization. This implies an individual difference nature of dehumanization propensity. Across four online studies (cross-sectional Studies 1, 3, 4, and longitudinal Study 2), we develop and validate the Humanity Inventory (HumIn), a self-report measure of individual differences in the propensity to engage dehumanization. Study 1 (N = 86) entailed item selection. Study 2 (N = 235) examined the validity of the scale and investigated its test–retest reliability. Study 3 (N = 259) compared the HumIn with pre-existing scales measuring related constructs. Study 4 (N = 98) examined the scale's performance in a situational example of dehumanization. Across all studies, the HumIn performs admirably, showing excellent reliability and validity. This novel instrument and broader conceptualization of dehumanization propensity should allow researchers to tackle questions related to dehumanization from a novel perspective, and will aid future research by providing a tool for assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Differential Pattern of Consequences of Self-Compassion Across Gender Individual and Contextual Factors Associated With the Prevention of Corruption: A Qualitative Study Among Iranian Public Employees Navigating the Role of Emotional Health and Positive Life Outlook on Work-Life Balance in Professional Married Women Atmosphere at Briefing Sessions and Its Influence on Local Residents’ Intention to Participate in Discussion Exploring the (Mal)adaptive Consequences of Self-Deceptive Enhancement: A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1