哺乳动物粪便中蚯蚓毛羽的检测:方法学意义

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Folia Zoologica Pub Date : 2019-02-01 DOI:10.25225/fozo.075.2019
A. Battisti, D. Giuliano, A. Balestrieri
{"title":"哺乳动物粪便中蚯蚓毛羽的检测:方法学意义","authors":"A. Battisti, D. Giuliano, A. Balestrieri","doi":"10.25225/fozo.075.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Earthworms are an important food resource for a large number of mammals and one of the most largely used method to assess their contribution to mammals' diet is the search for chaetae in faecal samples. Nevertheless, the observation and the identification of these bristles often require properly trained operators and suitable instruments, since their detection can be difficult and time-consuming. We tested the “standard” method for chaetae detection by washing 1046 scats – belonging to four mammal species of the Western Italian Alps (Vulpes vulpes, Martes spp., Lutra lutra, Sus scrofa) – through three sieves differing in mesh size (1.00, 0.54 and 0.21 mm). Mesh size significantly affected the detection of earthworm chaetae, suggesting that the use of three sieves should be recommended in faecal analyses. Moreover, both earthworm size and mean number of chaetae per individual should be assessed in each study area prior to diet analysis.","PeriodicalId":50436,"journal":{"name":"Folia Zoologica","volume":"44 1","pages":"43 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of earthworm chaetae in mammal faeces: methodological implications\",\"authors\":\"A. Battisti, D. Giuliano, A. Balestrieri\",\"doi\":\"10.25225/fozo.075.2019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Earthworms are an important food resource for a large number of mammals and one of the most largely used method to assess their contribution to mammals' diet is the search for chaetae in faecal samples. Nevertheless, the observation and the identification of these bristles often require properly trained operators and suitable instruments, since their detection can be difficult and time-consuming. We tested the “standard” method for chaetae detection by washing 1046 scats – belonging to four mammal species of the Western Italian Alps (Vulpes vulpes, Martes spp., Lutra lutra, Sus scrofa) – through three sieves differing in mesh size (1.00, 0.54 and 0.21 mm). Mesh size significantly affected the detection of earthworm chaetae, suggesting that the use of three sieves should be recommended in faecal analyses. Moreover, both earthworm size and mean number of chaetae per individual should be assessed in each study area prior to diet analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia Zoologica\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia Zoologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.075.2019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Zoologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.075.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要蚯蚓是许多哺乳动物的重要食物来源,评估蚯蚓对哺乳动物饮食贡献的最常用方法之一是在粪便样本中寻找毛纲。然而,观察和识别这些刚毛通常需要经过适当培训的操作人员和合适的仪器,因为它们的检测可能是困难和耗时的。我们测试了毛纲检测的“标准”方法,通过三种不同网目大小(1.00,0.54和0.21 mm)的筛子洗涤1046种属于意大利西部阿尔卑斯山脉的四种哺乳动物(Vulpes Vulpes, Martes spp., Lutra Lutra, Sus scrofa)。筛孔大小对蚯蚓毛囊的检测有显著影响,建议在粪便分析中推荐使用三筛。此外,在饮食分析之前,应评估每个研究区域的蚯蚓大小和每个个体的平均毛纲数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection of earthworm chaetae in mammal faeces: methodological implications
Abstract. Earthworms are an important food resource for a large number of mammals and one of the most largely used method to assess their contribution to mammals' diet is the search for chaetae in faecal samples. Nevertheless, the observation and the identification of these bristles often require properly trained operators and suitable instruments, since their detection can be difficult and time-consuming. We tested the “standard” method for chaetae detection by washing 1046 scats – belonging to four mammal species of the Western Italian Alps (Vulpes vulpes, Martes spp., Lutra lutra, Sus scrofa) – through three sieves differing in mesh size (1.00, 0.54 and 0.21 mm). Mesh size significantly affected the detection of earthworm chaetae, suggesting that the use of three sieves should be recommended in faecal analyses. Moreover, both earthworm size and mean number of chaetae per individual should be assessed in each study area prior to diet analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Zoologica
Folia Zoologica 生物-动物学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Browning plasticity of white adipose tissue in tree shrew during cold acclimation and rewarming How strong are eggs of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus? The blunt pole is not a source of more salient recognition cues than the sharp pole for the rejection of model eggs by American robins (Turdus migratorius) Survival of water rail Rallus aquaticus (Aves, Rallidae) embryos exposed to experimental flooding Nest-site selection of an avian urban exploiter, the Eurasian magpie Pica pica, across the urban-rural gradient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1