为什么成功这么难?将瑞士奶酪理论应用于环境实践

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Practice Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI:10.1080/14660466.2018.1489185
C. Battisti
{"title":"为什么成功这么难?将瑞士奶酪理论应用于环境实践","authors":"C. Battisti","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2018.1489185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The application of the linear accident causation model (“Swiss Cheese” theory) to environmental management could facilitate the communication of complex concepts by a general public. Metaphors are considered the only way to understand abstract issues: in this regard, this model could help the learning of project-based concepts in the environmental management arena using an accessible language. The further Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) integration allows moving from a schematic approach where conditioning factors are represented in cold matrices to a more appealing design suitable to communicate the project to a non-technical public. Through this approach, environmental practitioners could explore a number of conceptual tools used in project management, thereby increasing a trans-disciplinary process. Two examples of applications of this metaphor to real practices (and a framework of tools largely used in general management) are reported here.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"141 2","pages":"42 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14660466.2018.1489185","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why is it so difficult to have success? Applying the Swiss Cheese theory to environmental practices\",\"authors\":\"C. Battisti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14660466.2018.1489185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The application of the linear accident causation model (“Swiss Cheese” theory) to environmental management could facilitate the communication of complex concepts by a general public. Metaphors are considered the only way to understand abstract issues: in this regard, this model could help the learning of project-based concepts in the environmental management arena using an accessible language. The further Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) integration allows moving from a schematic approach where conditioning factors are represented in cold matrices to a more appealing design suitable to communicate the project to a non-technical public. Through this approach, environmental practitioners could explore a number of conceptual tools used in project management, thereby increasing a trans-disciplinary process. Two examples of applications of this metaphor to real practices (and a framework of tools largely used in general management) are reported here.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"volume\":\"141 2\",\"pages\":\"42 - 54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14660466.2018.1489185\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2018.1489185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2018.1489185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

将线性事故因果模型(“瑞士奶酪”理论)应用于环境管理,可以促进公众对复杂概念的交流。隐喻被认为是理解抽象问题的唯一途径:在这方面,这个模型可以帮助使用一种易于理解的语言学习环境管理领域中基于项目的概念。进一步的优势、劣势、机会、威胁(SWOT)集成允许从一个原理图方法(在冷矩阵中表示条件因素)转变为一个更吸引人的设计,适合与非技术公众交流项目。通过这种方法,环境实践者可以探索项目管理中使用的一些概念性工具,从而增加跨学科的过程。这里报告了将这个比喻应用于实际实践的两个例子(以及一个主要用于一般管理的工具框架)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why is it so difficult to have success? Applying the Swiss Cheese theory to environmental practices
ABSTRACT The application of the linear accident causation model (“Swiss Cheese” theory) to environmental management could facilitate the communication of complex concepts by a general public. Metaphors are considered the only way to understand abstract issues: in this regard, this model could help the learning of project-based concepts in the environmental management arena using an accessible language. The further Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) integration allows moving from a schematic approach where conditioning factors are represented in cold matrices to a more appealing design suitable to communicate the project to a non-technical public. Through this approach, environmental practitioners could explore a number of conceptual tools used in project management, thereby increasing a trans-disciplinary process. Two examples of applications of this metaphor to real practices (and a framework of tools largely used in general management) are reported here.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Practice
Environmental Practice ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals
期刊最新文献
Anthropological approaches for cultural resource conservation design and planning Cultural resources and landscape conservation design and planning Moving beyond the ecosystem in ecosystem health report cards Food Loss and Food Waste, Causes and Solutions Last issue of Environmental Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1