开放悖论与价值保护策略:校外研发对创新绩效的影响

A. Wadhwa, I. B. Freitas, M. Sarkar
{"title":"开放悖论与价值保护策略:校外研发对创新绩效的影响","authors":"A. Wadhwa, I. B. Freitas, M. Sarkar","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2017.1145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emphasis in firms on extramural research and development (R&D), involving increased engagement with external entities in the conduct of research, can also result in knowledge leakage. Knowledge leaks can undermine firm competitiveness, and to prevent this, firms deploy various isolating mechanisms to protect their knowledge. Integrating insights from the resource-based view and evolutionary theory, we hypothesize an inverted curvilinear relationship between extramural R&D and innovation and explain why the value protection strategies employed by firms change the relationship at various degrees of external knowledge sourcing. We test our hypotheses on a sample of 506 French manufacturing firms using data from three surveys conducted in the period 1998 to 2006. We find an inverted-U-shaped relationship between extramural R&D and innovation performance. This relationship is moderated by employee retention and secrecy such that the benefits of extramural R&D are weakened at lower degrees of extramural R&D...","PeriodicalId":93599,"journal":{"name":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","volume":"534 ","pages":"873-893"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1287/orsc.2017.1145","citationCount":"68","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradox of Openness and Value Protection Strategies: Effect of Extramural R&D on Innovative Performance\",\"authors\":\"A. Wadhwa, I. B. Freitas, M. Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/orsc.2017.1145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emphasis in firms on extramural research and development (R&D), involving increased engagement with external entities in the conduct of research, can also result in knowledge leakage. Knowledge leaks can undermine firm competitiveness, and to prevent this, firms deploy various isolating mechanisms to protect their knowledge. Integrating insights from the resource-based view and evolutionary theory, we hypothesize an inverted curvilinear relationship between extramural R&D and innovation and explain why the value protection strategies employed by firms change the relationship at various degrees of external knowledge sourcing. We test our hypotheses on a sample of 506 French manufacturing firms using data from three surveys conducted in the period 1998 to 2006. We find an inverted-U-shaped relationship between extramural R&D and innovation performance. This relationship is moderated by employee retention and secrecy such that the benefits of extramural R&D are weakened at lower degrees of extramural R&D...\",\"PeriodicalId\":93599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)\",\"volume\":\"534 \",\"pages\":\"873-893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1287/orsc.2017.1145\",\"citationCount\":\"68\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

摘要

企业对外部研发(R&D)的重视,包括在研究过程中增加与外部实体的接触,也可能导致知识泄漏。知识泄露会破坏企业的竞争力,为了防止这种情况,企业部署了各种隔离机制来保护他们的知识。本文结合资源基础理论和进化理论的见解,假设外部研发与创新之间存在倒曲线关系,并解释了企业采用的价值保护策略在不同程度上改变外部知识来源关系的原因。我们使用1998年至2006年期间进行的三次调查的数据对506家法国制造公司的样本进行了假设检验。研究发现,企业外部研发与创新绩效呈倒u型关系。这种关系受到员工保留和保密的调节,因此外部研发的收益在外部研发程度较低时被削弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Paradox of Openness and Value Protection Strategies: Effect of Extramural R&D on Innovative Performance
The emphasis in firms on extramural research and development (R&D), involving increased engagement with external entities in the conduct of research, can also result in knowledge leakage. Knowledge leaks can undermine firm competitiveness, and to prevent this, firms deploy various isolating mechanisms to protect their knowledge. Integrating insights from the resource-based view and evolutionary theory, we hypothesize an inverted curvilinear relationship between extramural R&D and innovation and explain why the value protection strategies employed by firms change the relationship at various degrees of external knowledge sourcing. We test our hypotheses on a sample of 506 French manufacturing firms using data from three surveys conducted in the period 1998 to 2006. We find an inverted-U-shaped relationship between extramural R&D and innovation performance. This relationship is moderated by employee retention and secrecy such that the benefits of extramural R&D are weakened at lower degrees of extramural R&D...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organizational and Perceived Learning in the Workplace: A Multilevel Perspective on Employees' Problem Solving Call for Papers-Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory The Lasting Benefits of Teams: Tie Vitality After Teams Disband Falling Not Far from the Tree: Entrepreneurs and Organizational Heritage Blurred Lines: How the Collectivism Norm Operates Through Perceived Group Diversity to Boost or Harm Group Performance in Himalayan Mountain Climbing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1