乳腺细针穿刺细胞过少在三筛阴性的情况下的诊断准确性是什么

R. Arrangóiz, Susan Garand, C. Slomski, Travis A. Littman, J. Osuch
{"title":"乳腺细针穿刺细胞过少在三筛阴性的情况下的诊断准确性是什么","authors":"R. Arrangóiz, Susan Garand, C. Slomski, Travis A. Littman, J. Osuch","doi":"10.5580/5eb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We hypothesize that a hypocellullar FNA of a palpable breast mass provides diagnostic accuracy in the context of an otherwise negative triple diagnosis (TD).Methods: A database of 1279 patients with palpable lesions was retrospectively reviewed. Lesions <1.5cm in size, clinical breast exam (CBE) not suspicious for cancer, mammography results of BIRADS I and II, and hypocellular FNAB results were extracted from the database and correlated with final pathology on openbiopsy.Results: There were 276 patients with hypocellular results. Of those, 165 had mammograms of BIRADS I and II. After review of the clinical breast exam data, 83 patients met our study criteria. All were negative for malignancy on open biopsy - a false negative rate of 0% and negative predictive value of 100%.Conclusion: A hypocellular FNA, in the context of a benign CBE and breast imaging study is diagnostically accurate, eliminating the need for breast biopsy.","PeriodicalId":22534,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Oncology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Hypocellular Fine Needle Aspiration of the Breast in the Context of an Otherwise Negative Triple Screen\",\"authors\":\"R. Arrangóiz, Susan Garand, C. Slomski, Travis A. Littman, J. Osuch\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/5eb\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We hypothesize that a hypocellullar FNA of a palpable breast mass provides diagnostic accuracy in the context of an otherwise negative triple diagnosis (TD).Methods: A database of 1279 patients with palpable lesions was retrospectively reviewed. Lesions <1.5cm in size, clinical breast exam (CBE) not suspicious for cancer, mammography results of BIRADS I and II, and hypocellular FNAB results were extracted from the database and correlated with final pathology on openbiopsy.Results: There were 276 patients with hypocellular results. Of those, 165 had mammograms of BIRADS I and II. After review of the clinical breast exam data, 83 patients met our study criteria. All were negative for malignancy on open biopsy - a false negative rate of 0% and negative predictive value of 100%.Conclusion: A hypocellular FNA, in the context of a benign CBE and breast imaging study is diagnostically accurate, eliminating the need for breast biopsy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Oncology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/5eb\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/5eb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们假设可触及乳腺肿块的细胞下FNA在其他阴性三重诊断(TD)的情况下提供了诊断准确性。方法:回顾性分析1279例可触及病变患者的资料。从数据库中提取大小<1.5cm的病变、临床乳腺检查(CBE)未怀疑为癌的病变、BIRADS I和II的乳房x光检查结果以及低细胞FNAB结果,并将其与开放活检的最终病理结果相关联。结果:276例患者出现细胞减少。其中165人进行了BIRADS I和II的乳房x光检查。在回顾临床乳腺检查资料后,83例患者符合我们的研究标准。所有患者在开放性活检中均为恶性肿瘤阴性——假阴性率为0%,阴性预测值为100%。结论:在良性CBE和乳腺影像学研究的背景下,低细胞FNA诊断准确,无需乳腺活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Hypocellular Fine Needle Aspiration of the Breast in the Context of an Otherwise Negative Triple Screen
Background: We hypothesize that a hypocellullar FNA of a palpable breast mass provides diagnostic accuracy in the context of an otherwise negative triple diagnosis (TD).Methods: A database of 1279 patients with palpable lesions was retrospectively reviewed. Lesions <1.5cm in size, clinical breast exam (CBE) not suspicious for cancer, mammography results of BIRADS I and II, and hypocellular FNAB results were extracted from the database and correlated with final pathology on openbiopsy.Results: There were 276 patients with hypocellular results. Of those, 165 had mammograms of BIRADS I and II. After review of the clinical breast exam data, 83 patients met our study criteria. All were negative for malignancy on open biopsy - a false negative rate of 0% and negative predictive value of 100%.Conclusion: A hypocellular FNA, in the context of a benign CBE and breast imaging study is diagnostically accurate, eliminating the need for breast biopsy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: A Deceptive Neoplasm. Internal Mammary Node Evaluation And Elective Nodal Treatment In Medial Breast Cancers: A Case Report And Review Of The Literature. Adjuvant Radiation Therapy For Wedge-Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Adjacent To A Large Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: A Case Report And Review Of The Literature Acute Pancreatitis Following VAD Chemotherapy Combination Consisting Of Vincristine, Doxorubicin, And Dexamethasone In A Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patient: A Case Report. A Rare Case Of Dysgerminoma In A 58-Year Old Postmenopausal Woman In Makurdi, North Central Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1