一家公司的出身对道德判断有影响吗?

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Brq-Business Research Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI:10.1177/2340944420981597
Hind Dib-Slamani, G. Grolleau, Naoufel Mzoughi
{"title":"一家公司的出身对道德判断有影响吗?","authors":"Hind Dib-Slamani, G. Grolleau, Naoufel Mzoughi","doi":"10.1177/2340944420981597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We blend the institutional and social identity theories to explain why foreign companies may endure a differentiated treatment compared to domestic ones. We extend the “liability of foreignness” (LOF) reasoning to the moral domain. Using a survey experiment in Algeria and France, we examine whether observers judge similarly or differently the same ethical and unethical practices by manipulating the doers’ origin. Each treatment corresponds to a specific combination of company behavior (ethical vs. unethical) and company origin (no origin mentioned vs. domestic origin vs. foreign origin). We found that company origin matters for the ethical and some unethical scenarios. However, the foreignness consequences in the moral domain are not always consistent with a simplistic application of LOF-based arguments, leading us to consider a more complex picture than initially expected. In the Algerian sample, we found that foreign companies can even benefit from an advantage compared to domestic ones. JEL CLASSIFICATION F23; C91","PeriodicalId":46891,"journal":{"name":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a company’s origin matter in moral judgment?\",\"authors\":\"Hind Dib-Slamani, G. Grolleau, Naoufel Mzoughi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2340944420981597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We blend the institutional and social identity theories to explain why foreign companies may endure a differentiated treatment compared to domestic ones. We extend the “liability of foreignness” (LOF) reasoning to the moral domain. Using a survey experiment in Algeria and France, we examine whether observers judge similarly or differently the same ethical and unethical practices by manipulating the doers’ origin. Each treatment corresponds to a specific combination of company behavior (ethical vs. unethical) and company origin (no origin mentioned vs. domestic origin vs. foreign origin). We found that company origin matters for the ethical and some unethical scenarios. However, the foreignness consequences in the moral domain are not always consistent with a simplistic application of LOF-based arguments, leading us to consider a more complex picture than initially expected. In the Algerian sample, we found that foreign companies can even benefit from an advantage compared to domestic ones. JEL CLASSIFICATION F23; C91\",\"PeriodicalId\":46891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brq-Business Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brq-Business Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420981597\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420981597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们将制度认同理论与社会认同理论相结合,来解释为什么外资企业与国内企业相比可能会受到区别对待。我们将“异域责任”(loof)推理扩展到道德领域。通过在阿尔及利亚和法国进行的一项调查实验,我们研究了观察者是否通过操纵行为人的出身来对相同的道德和不道德行为做出相似或不同的判断。每一种待遇都对应于公司行为(道德与不道德)和公司来源(没有提及来源、国内来源与国外来源)的特定组合。我们发现,公司出身对道德和一些不道德的情况很重要。然而,道德领域的异域性后果并不总是与基于lof的论点的简单应用相一致,导致我们考虑比最初预期的更复杂的情况。在阿尔及利亚的样本中,我们发现外国公司甚至可以从与国内公司相比的优势中受益。凝胶分类f23;C91
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does a company’s origin matter in moral judgment?
We blend the institutional and social identity theories to explain why foreign companies may endure a differentiated treatment compared to domestic ones. We extend the “liability of foreignness” (LOF) reasoning to the moral domain. Using a survey experiment in Algeria and France, we examine whether observers judge similarly or differently the same ethical and unethical practices by manipulating the doers’ origin. Each treatment corresponds to a specific combination of company behavior (ethical vs. unethical) and company origin (no origin mentioned vs. domestic origin vs. foreign origin). We found that company origin matters for the ethical and some unethical scenarios. However, the foreignness consequences in the moral domain are not always consistent with a simplistic application of LOF-based arguments, leading us to consider a more complex picture than initially expected. In the Algerian sample, we found that foreign companies can even benefit from an advantage compared to domestic ones. JEL CLASSIFICATION F23; C91
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Strategic supplier performance in a competitive landscape: Enhancing organizational performance through lean supply chain management Leading a post-pandemic workforce: Understanding employees’ changing work ethic How to improve quality investing Uncertainty’s impact on adaptive performance in the post-COVID era: The moderating role of perceived leader’s effectiveness Strategy-making: The use and misuse of artifacts to achieve common understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1