[妇女和医药]。

Susan H. Anthes, L. Crowe
{"title":"[妇女和医药]。","authors":"Susan H. Anthes, L. Crowe","doi":"10.1300/J103v12n02_01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the two preceding decades (1970-1990), many female authors and patients as well as some health care professionals and social scientists have asserted that male physicians have denied women their right to self-determination in their medical treatment. In particular, the writings described here raise ethical concerns about patient autonomy, informed consent for specific procedures, and medical paternalism. The works reviewed argue that physicians apparently have assumed that women share without question the values of male-dominated society in respect to medical treatment for women. Advances in medical technology have encouraged physicians to treat organs and diseases independently without regard for the whole person. This article reviews books that consider ethical questions in the areas of childbirth, contraception, and reproductive technologies.","PeriodicalId":18016,"journal":{"name":"La Prensa medica mexicana","volume":"22 1","pages":"24-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Women and medicine].\",\"authors\":\"Susan H. Anthes, L. Crowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J103v12n02_01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the two preceding decades (1970-1990), many female authors and patients as well as some health care professionals and social scientists have asserted that male physicians have denied women their right to self-determination in their medical treatment. In particular, the writings described here raise ethical concerns about patient autonomy, informed consent for specific procedures, and medical paternalism. The works reviewed argue that physicians apparently have assumed that women share without question the values of male-dominated society in respect to medical treatment for women. Advances in medical technology have encouraged physicians to treat organs and diseases independently without regard for the whole person. This article reviews books that consider ethical questions in the areas of childbirth, contraception, and reproductive technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"La Prensa medica mexicana\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"24-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"La Prensa medica mexicana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J103v12n02_01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La Prensa medica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J103v12n02_01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在之前的二十年(1970-1990年)中,许多女性作者和患者以及一些保健专业人员和社会科学家声称,男性医生剥夺了妇女在医疗方面的自决权。特别是,这里描述的文章引起了对患者自主权、特定程序的知情同意和医疗家长式作风的伦理关注。所审查的作品认为,医生显然假定妇女毫无疑问地分享男性主导的社会对妇女医疗的价值观。医学技术的进步鼓励医生独立治疗器官和疾病,而不考虑整个人。这篇文章回顾了在生育、避孕和生殖技术方面考虑伦理问题的书籍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Women and medicine].
In the two preceding decades (1970-1990), many female authors and patients as well as some health care professionals and social scientists have asserted that male physicians have denied women their right to self-determination in their medical treatment. In particular, the writings described here raise ethical concerns about patient autonomy, informed consent for specific procedures, and medical paternalism. The works reviewed argue that physicians apparently have assumed that women share without question the values of male-dominated society in respect to medical treatment for women. Advances in medical technology have encouraged physicians to treat organs and diseases independently without regard for the whole person. This article reviews books that consider ethical questions in the areas of childbirth, contraception, and reproductive technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Women and medicine]. [Efficacy of and tolerance to mefenamic acid in dysfunctional hypermenorrhea]. [Vectorcardiographic manifestations of left ventricular and biventricular enlargement]. [Vectorcardiographic manifestations of right ventricular enlargement]. [Vectorcardiographic manifestations of left intraventricular conduction disorders].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1