安宁疗护诈骗与滥用:恢复信任行动及其他

Gerald M. Morris
{"title":"安宁疗护诈骗与滥用:恢复信任行动及其他","authors":"Gerald M. Morris","doi":"10.1177/104990910302000103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medicare-funded hospice is at a crossroad. It is estimated that in the year 2000, of the 2.4 million Americans who died, one in four used hospice. The demand for hospice services is projected to grow as the baby-boomer population continues to age and experiences the health issues that come with it. Yet evidence suggests the program is failing to fulfill its statutory purpose as a meaningful benefit to many, particularly those with noncancerous conditions. The causes for this include unwieldy eligibility criteria and the chilling effect of aggressive fraud enforcement. The unique nature and scope of hospice services available under Medicare, and their complex interrelationship with other Medicare benefits, all contribute to the errors and fraud graphically illustrated by government enforcement activities. Operation Restore Trust and similar enforcement activities may be restoring confidence that inappropriate expenditures are being wrung out of the hospice system. But at the same time, they are also creating distrust, particularly among those with noncancerous conditions, about whether they will receive the benefits for which they are eligible and to which they are entitled. In part, this is a consequence of the chilling effect (real or perceived) that aggressive enforcement is having on physicians and hospice medical directors who certify eligibility to the program. This paper reviews the Medicare hospice benefit, identifies the more significant fraud and abuse issues that hospice presents, examines the impact of Operation Restore Trust and other compliance activities on hospice, and makes final observations about the future.","PeriodicalId":7716,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®","volume":"32 1","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospice fraud and abuse: Operation Restore Trust and beyond\",\"authors\":\"Gerald M. Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/104990910302000103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medicare-funded hospice is at a crossroad. It is estimated that in the year 2000, of the 2.4 million Americans who died, one in four used hospice. The demand for hospice services is projected to grow as the baby-boomer population continues to age and experiences the health issues that come with it. Yet evidence suggests the program is failing to fulfill its statutory purpose as a meaningful benefit to many, particularly those with noncancerous conditions. The causes for this include unwieldy eligibility criteria and the chilling effect of aggressive fraud enforcement. The unique nature and scope of hospice services available under Medicare, and their complex interrelationship with other Medicare benefits, all contribute to the errors and fraud graphically illustrated by government enforcement activities. Operation Restore Trust and similar enforcement activities may be restoring confidence that inappropriate expenditures are being wrung out of the hospice system. But at the same time, they are also creating distrust, particularly among those with noncancerous conditions, about whether they will receive the benefits for which they are eligible and to which they are entitled. In part, this is a consequence of the chilling effect (real or perceived) that aggressive enforcement is having on physicians and hospice medical directors who certify eligibility to the program. This paper reviews the Medicare hospice benefit, identifies the more significant fraud and abuse issues that hospice presents, examines the impact of Operation Restore Trust and other compliance activities on hospice, and makes final observations about the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/104990910302000103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/104990910302000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

医疗保险资助的临终关怀正处于十字路口。据估计,在2000年,240万美国人死亡,四分之一的人使用临终关怀。对临终关怀服务的需求预计将随着婴儿潮人口的持续老龄化和随之而来的健康问题而增长。然而,有证据表明,该计划未能实现其法定目的,即为许多人带来有意义的福利,尤其是那些患有非癌症疾病的人。造成这种情况的原因包括繁琐的资格标准和积极的欺诈执法的寒蝉效应。联邦医疗保险提供的临终关怀服务的独特性质和范围,以及它们与其他联邦医疗保险福利之间复杂的相互关系,都导致了政府执法活动生动地说明了错误和欺诈。恢复信任行动和类似的执法活动可能会恢复人们的信心,即不适当的支出正在从临终关怀系统中剔除。但与此同时,它们也在制造不信任,尤其是在那些没有癌症的人中间,他们担心自己是否能得到他们有资格获得的福利。在某种程度上,这是一种寒蝉效应(真实的或感知的)的结果,即激进的执法对证明该计划资格的医生和临终关怀医疗主任产生了寒蝉效应。本文回顾医疗安宁疗护福利,找出安宁疗护所呈现的更显著的诈欺与滥用问题,检视恢复信任行动与其他合规性活动对安宁疗护的影响,并对未来作出最后的观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hospice fraud and abuse: Operation Restore Trust and beyond
Medicare-funded hospice is at a crossroad. It is estimated that in the year 2000, of the 2.4 million Americans who died, one in four used hospice. The demand for hospice services is projected to grow as the baby-boomer population continues to age and experiences the health issues that come with it. Yet evidence suggests the program is failing to fulfill its statutory purpose as a meaningful benefit to many, particularly those with noncancerous conditions. The causes for this include unwieldy eligibility criteria and the chilling effect of aggressive fraud enforcement. The unique nature and scope of hospice services available under Medicare, and their complex interrelationship with other Medicare benefits, all contribute to the errors and fraud graphically illustrated by government enforcement activities. Operation Restore Trust and similar enforcement activities may be restoring confidence that inappropriate expenditures are being wrung out of the hospice system. But at the same time, they are also creating distrust, particularly among those with noncancerous conditions, about whether they will receive the benefits for which they are eligible and to which they are entitled. In part, this is a consequence of the chilling effect (real or perceived) that aggressive enforcement is having on physicians and hospice medical directors who certify eligibility to the program. This paper reviews the Medicare hospice benefit, identifies the more significant fraud and abuse issues that hospice presents, examines the impact of Operation Restore Trust and other compliance activities on hospice, and makes final observations about the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Oral Health Status and Survival Time in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Hospice news 2005 Cumulative subject index Hospice news Call for manuscripts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1