在高等教育背景下整合反生产知识行为:提出解释教师表现的潜在补救措施

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Global Knowledge Memory and Communication Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.1108/gkmc-01-2023-0035
Z. Zamrudi, M. Setiawan, D. Irawanto, Mintarti Rahayu
{"title":"在高等教育背景下整合反生产知识行为:提出解释教师表现的潜在补救措施","authors":"Z. Zamrudi, M. Setiawan, D. Irawanto, Mintarti Rahayu","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-01-2023-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to seek to understand counterproductive knowledge behaviour (CKB) in higher education institutions (HEIs) by integrating knowledge hiding (KHi) and lack of knowledge sharing (LKS).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe current research uses a hybrid conceptual review combining the bibliometric study and conceptual review of 47 articles. The bibliometric analysis aimed to identify research maps, and the conceptual review sought to understand the current development of research fields.\n\n\nFindings\nThe bibliometric analysis highlights essential summaries, such as the pioneering authors, seminal papers and conceptual maps. However, knowledge hoarding as a dimension of LKS appears in the niche theme. The conceptual analysis indicates three groups of factors contributing to KHi and LKS. Moreover, the study highlights the causal relation between both KHi as well as LKS and faculty member performance while proposing remedies derived from integrating the social exchange theory (SET) and conservation of resource (COR) theory.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe present study provides an integrated image of KHi and LKS in the HEI context, as well as its potential remedies by integrating SET and COR. The basis of this study is a literature review; thus, future studies are recommended to empirically explore the integration of KHi and LKS within the HEI context.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis research provides an overview for HEI policymakers to re-examine the critical role of institutional research as one of the considerations for evaluating and developing policies. Specifically, policymakers can reflect on all policy directions to determine whether there are any symptoms of CKB in the institutions. Moreover, stakeholders can find out the reason behind the non-optimal performance of faculty members regarding CKB and any mitigating factors.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nUnderstanding CKB is crucial in managing HEI. This research provides a comprehensive image of KHi and LKS within HEI, especially in a collectivist culture.\n","PeriodicalId":43718,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating counterproductive knowledge behaviour in the higher education context: proposing the potential remedies in explaining the faculty members’ performance\",\"authors\":\"Z. Zamrudi, M. Setiawan, D. Irawanto, Mintarti Rahayu\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/gkmc-01-2023-0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to seek to understand counterproductive knowledge behaviour (CKB) in higher education institutions (HEIs) by integrating knowledge hiding (KHi) and lack of knowledge sharing (LKS).\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe current research uses a hybrid conceptual review combining the bibliometric study and conceptual review of 47 articles. The bibliometric analysis aimed to identify research maps, and the conceptual review sought to understand the current development of research fields.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe bibliometric analysis highlights essential summaries, such as the pioneering authors, seminal papers and conceptual maps. However, knowledge hoarding as a dimension of LKS appears in the niche theme. The conceptual analysis indicates three groups of factors contributing to KHi and LKS. Moreover, the study highlights the causal relation between both KHi as well as LKS and faculty member performance while proposing remedies derived from integrating the social exchange theory (SET) and conservation of resource (COR) theory.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe present study provides an integrated image of KHi and LKS in the HEI context, as well as its potential remedies by integrating SET and COR. The basis of this study is a literature review; thus, future studies are recommended to empirically explore the integration of KHi and LKS within the HEI context.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis research provides an overview for HEI policymakers to re-examine the critical role of institutional research as one of the considerations for evaluating and developing policies. Specifically, policymakers can reflect on all policy directions to determine whether there are any symptoms of CKB in the institutions. Moreover, stakeholders can find out the reason behind the non-optimal performance of faculty members regarding CKB and any mitigating factors.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nUnderstanding CKB is crucial in managing HEI. This research provides a comprehensive image of KHi and LKS within HEI, especially in a collectivist culture.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-01-2023-0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-01-2023-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在整合知识隐藏和知识共享缺失,探讨高校反生产知识行为。设计/方法/方法本研究采用文献计量学研究和概念综述相结合的混合概念综述方法,共纳入47篇文献。文献计量学分析旨在确定研究地图,概念综述旨在了解研究领域的当前发展。文献计量分析突出了重要的摘要,如先锋作者、开创性论文和概念图。然而,知识囤积作为LKS的一个维度出现在小众主题中。概念分析表明,影响KHi和LKS的因素有三组。此外,本研究强调了KHi和LKS与教师绩效之间的因果关系,并提出了整合社会交换理论(SET)和资源保护理论(COR)的补救措施。本研究提供了高智商背景下KHi和LKS的综合图像,以及通过整合SET和COR来解决其潜在的补救措施。因此,建议未来的研究在高等教育背景下实证地探索知识产权和知识产权的整合。本研究为高等教育决策者提供了一个概述,以重新审视制度研究作为评估和制定政策的考虑因素之一的关键作用。具体而言,决策者可以反思所有政策方向,以确定机构中是否存在CKB症状。此外,利益相关者可以找出教师在CKB方面表现不佳的原因和缓解因素。原创性/价值理解CKB对于管理HEI至关重要。本研究提供了HEI中KHi和LKS的综合形象,特别是在集体主义文化中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incorporating counterproductive knowledge behaviour in the higher education context: proposing the potential remedies in explaining the faculty members’ performance
Purpose This study aims to seek to understand counterproductive knowledge behaviour (CKB) in higher education institutions (HEIs) by integrating knowledge hiding (KHi) and lack of knowledge sharing (LKS). Design/methodology/approach The current research uses a hybrid conceptual review combining the bibliometric study and conceptual review of 47 articles. The bibliometric analysis aimed to identify research maps, and the conceptual review sought to understand the current development of research fields. Findings The bibliometric analysis highlights essential summaries, such as the pioneering authors, seminal papers and conceptual maps. However, knowledge hoarding as a dimension of LKS appears in the niche theme. The conceptual analysis indicates three groups of factors contributing to KHi and LKS. Moreover, the study highlights the causal relation between both KHi as well as LKS and faculty member performance while proposing remedies derived from integrating the social exchange theory (SET) and conservation of resource (COR) theory. Research limitations/implications The present study provides an integrated image of KHi and LKS in the HEI context, as well as its potential remedies by integrating SET and COR. The basis of this study is a literature review; thus, future studies are recommended to empirically explore the integration of KHi and LKS within the HEI context. Practical implications This research provides an overview for HEI policymakers to re-examine the critical role of institutional research as one of the considerations for evaluating and developing policies. Specifically, policymakers can reflect on all policy directions to determine whether there are any symptoms of CKB in the institutions. Moreover, stakeholders can find out the reason behind the non-optimal performance of faculty members regarding CKB and any mitigating factors. Originality/value Understanding CKB is crucial in managing HEI. This research provides a comprehensive image of KHi and LKS within HEI, especially in a collectivist culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
77
期刊最新文献
Mapping covid-19 and transportation: a taxonomical study using bibliometric visualisation The persistence of print books: exploring language preference and format preference among Arabic-speaking library patrons in Jordan A checklist to publish collections as data in GLAM institutions A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones to access library services and resources: challenges and benefits Citation analysis and mapping of genetics research in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1