希望缩短工时？关于工作时间偏好和结果的系统性研究

IF 2.8 4区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS International Labour Review Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12406

Miklós ANTAL, Benedikt LEHMANN, Thiago GUIMARAES, Alexandra HALMOS, Bence LUKÁCS

{"title":"希望缩短工时？关于工作时间偏好和结果的系统性研究","authors":"Miklós ANTAL, Benedikt LEHMANN, Thiago GUIMARAES, Alexandra HALMOS, Bence LUKÁCS","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Changes in working time have important economic, social and environmental implications. However, research on workers' preferences is highly fragmented across disciplines and journals. To overcome this, the present article provides a systematic review of the literature, analysing 173 studies. The study shows that working-time outcomes and mismatches are mostly studied in a small group of OECD countries, using survey data and statistical methods. The most clear and consistent results are about gender, care responsibilities and current working hours. Among professions, only the medical workforce receives substantial attention. Norms and preference formation are poorly understood, and more qualitative research is essential to understand how working-time reductions could spread.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"163 1","pages":"25-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12406","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shorter hours wanted? A systematic review of working-time preferences and outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Miklós ANTAL, Benedikt LEHMANN, Thiago GUIMARAES, Alexandra HALMOS, Bence LUKÁCS\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Changes in working time have important economic, social and environmental implications. However, research on workers' preferences is highly fragmented across disciplines and journals. To overcome this, the present article provides a systematic review of the literature, analysing 173 studies. The study shows that working-time outcomes and mismatches are mostly studied in a small group of OECD countries, using survey data and statistical methods. The most clear and consistent results are about gender, care responsibilities and current working hours. Among professions, only the medical workforce receives substantial attention. Norms and preference formation are poorly understood, and more qualitative research is essential to understand how working-time reductions could spread.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"25-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12406\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12406\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

工作时间的变化具有重要的经济、社会和环境影响。然而，关于工人偏好的研究在不同学科和期刊中非常分散。为了克服这一问题，本文对文献进行了系统回顾，分析了 173 项研究。研究表明，工作时间的结果和错配问题主要是在一小部分经合组织国家利用调查数据和统计方法进行研究的。最明确、最一致的结果涉及性别、护理责任和当前工作时间。在各行各业中，只有医务人员队伍受到大量关注。人们对规范和偏好的形成知之甚少，必须开展更多的定性研究，以了解减少工作时间的做法是如何推广的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Shorter hours wanted? A systematic review of working-time preferences and outcomes

Changes in working time have important economic, social and environmental implications. However, research on workers' preferences is highly fragmented across disciplines and journals. To overcome this, the present article provides a systematic review of the literature, analysing 173 studies. The study shows that working-time outcomes and mismatches are mostly studied in a small group of OECD countries, using survey data and statistical methods. The most clear and consistent results are about gender, care responsibilities and current working hours. Among professions, only the medical workforce receives substantial attention. Norms and preference formation are poorly understood, and more qualitative research is essential to understand how working-time reductions could spread.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Labour Review Multiple-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.