研究对老年人语义扩展和概念化的影响

S. Barimani, A. Khanzadeh
{"title":"研究对老年人语义扩展和概念化的影响","authors":"S. Barimani, A. Khanzadeh","doi":"10.18869/acadpub.joge.1.3.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Semantic expansion and conceptualization are key factors for problem-solving and learning scientific concepts in the learners. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of reading on semantic expansion and conceptualization of the elderly men and women who are 60 years and older in Tehran. Method: The research method is descriptive in terms of the method and is exploratory survey is terms of minor purpose. The method of sampling is based on availability, so in accordance with the purpose of the study, participants were selected. The participants were divided in 3 subgroups: The elderlies who do not study at all, those who study maximum 30 minutes a day and the elderlies who study 60 minutes and above each day. The research tool is the questioner built by the researcher. The researcher tries to measure semantic expansion and conceptualization of three groups of elderly people in the provided words that indicate concrete and abstract concepts. The groups were matched in terms of literacy level. Descriptive statistical methods such as mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution tables is used for data analysis and analysis method of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is also used for inferential analysis. Results: The results show that the amount of study of elderly people has an effect on writing components and features of the concept, on the objective and abstract concepts, on the composition and the inclusion of the intended concept into other concepts and in creating a close relationship between the desired concept and other concepts as well as the presented concepts against the intended","PeriodicalId":15922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gerontology","volume":"230 1","pages":"49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the study on semantic expansion and conceptualization in the elderly\",\"authors\":\"S. Barimani, A. Khanzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.18869/acadpub.joge.1.3.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Semantic expansion and conceptualization are key factors for problem-solving and learning scientific concepts in the learners. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of reading on semantic expansion and conceptualization of the elderly men and women who are 60 years and older in Tehran. Method: The research method is descriptive in terms of the method and is exploratory survey is terms of minor purpose. The method of sampling is based on availability, so in accordance with the purpose of the study, participants were selected. The participants were divided in 3 subgroups: The elderlies who do not study at all, those who study maximum 30 minutes a day and the elderlies who study 60 minutes and above each day. The research tool is the questioner built by the researcher. The researcher tries to measure semantic expansion and conceptualization of three groups of elderly people in the provided words that indicate concrete and abstract concepts. The groups were matched in terms of literacy level. Descriptive statistical methods such as mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution tables is used for data analysis and analysis method of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is also used for inferential analysis. Results: The results show that the amount of study of elderly people has an effect on writing components and features of the concept, on the objective and abstract concepts, on the composition and the inclusion of the intended concept into other concepts and in creating a close relationship between the desired concept and other concepts as well as the presented concepts against the intended\",\"PeriodicalId\":15922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gerontology\",\"volume\":\"230 1\",\"pages\":\"49-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.joge.1.3.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.joge.1.3.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语义扩展和概念化是学习者解决问题和学习科学概念的关键因素。本研究旨在探讨阅读对德黑兰60岁及以上老年男女的语义扩展和概念化的影响。方法:研究方法在方法上是描述性的,在次要目的上是探索性的调查。抽样的方法是基于可得性,所以根据研究的目的,选择参与者。参与者被分为三组:完全不学习的老年人、每天学习最多30分钟的老年人和每天学习60分钟及以上的老年人。研究工具是研究者构建的提问者。研究者试图测量三组老年人在提供的表示具体和抽象概念的词语中的语义扩展和概念化。这两组在文化水平上是相匹配的。数据分析采用均值、标准差、频率分布表等描述性统计方法,推断分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)的分析方法。结果:研究结果表明,老年人的学习量对概念的写作成分和特征、客观概念和抽象概念、意图概念的构成和融入其他概念、创造期望概念与其他概念之间的密切关系以及呈现的概念与意图之间的关系都有影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of the study on semantic expansion and conceptualization in the elderly
Introduction: Semantic expansion and conceptualization are key factors for problem-solving and learning scientific concepts in the learners. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of reading on semantic expansion and conceptualization of the elderly men and women who are 60 years and older in Tehran. Method: The research method is descriptive in terms of the method and is exploratory survey is terms of minor purpose. The method of sampling is based on availability, so in accordance with the purpose of the study, participants were selected. The participants were divided in 3 subgroups: The elderlies who do not study at all, those who study maximum 30 minutes a day and the elderlies who study 60 minutes and above each day. The research tool is the questioner built by the researcher. The researcher tries to measure semantic expansion and conceptualization of three groups of elderly people in the provided words that indicate concrete and abstract concepts. The groups were matched in terms of literacy level. Descriptive statistical methods such as mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution tables is used for data analysis and analysis method of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is also used for inferential analysis. Results: The results show that the amount of study of elderly people has an effect on writing components and features of the concept, on the objective and abstract concepts, on the composition and the inclusion of the intended concept into other concepts and in creating a close relationship between the desired concept and other concepts as well as the presented concepts against the intended
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of substance abuse, mental health and frailty among elderly hospitalized in Hazrat-e Rasoul Hospital The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on Promoting Mental Health and Quality of Life in Elderly Women Predictors of Length of Hospital Stay in Stroke Patients and the Role of These Factors in the Management of Neurology Ward Hospital Beds Comparison of Coping Strategies and Perception of Aging in Successful and Unsuccessful Elderly People of Ardabil in 2019 Comparison of the General Health and Happiness of the Elderly Living in Nursing Homes, Private Homes with and without Family-Based Rehabilitation Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1