英国与共识政治,1945-1955:神话还是现实?

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Odisea Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.25115/odisea.v0i22.4901
Carlos Soriano Jiménez
{"title":"英国与共识政治,1945-1955:神话还是现实?","authors":"Carlos Soriano Jiménez","doi":"10.25115/odisea.v0i22.4901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study lies within the framework of the years 1945-1955, which correspond to Clement Attlee’s Labourite and Winston Churchill’s Conservative administrations. The objective is to demonstrate, by means of an analysis of their speeches and the proposals of their respective political parties, that the ideological differences hindered a total agreement. These primary sources are examined from several perspectives. The main emphasis of this study falls on the ideology as a distinctive element and its influence on other fields such as education, the welfare system or the economy. The results reveal a lack of consensus based on their opposite political cultures.","PeriodicalId":33609,"journal":{"name":"Odisea","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BRITAIN AND CONSENSUS POLITICS, 1945-1955: MYTH OR REALITY?\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Soriano Jiménez\",\"doi\":\"10.25115/odisea.v0i22.4901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study lies within the framework of the years 1945-1955, which correspond to Clement Attlee’s Labourite and Winston Churchill’s Conservative administrations. The objective is to demonstrate, by means of an analysis of their speeches and the proposals of their respective political parties, that the ideological differences hindered a total agreement. These primary sources are examined from several perspectives. The main emphasis of this study falls on the ideology as a distinctive element and its influence on other fields such as education, the welfare system or the economy. The results reveal a lack of consensus based on their opposite political cultures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Odisea\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Odisea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i22.4901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odisea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i22.4901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究是在1945-1955年的框架内进行的,这与克莱门特·艾德礼的工党和温斯顿·丘吉尔的保守党政府相对应。目的是通过分析他们的发言和各自政党的建议来证明,意识形态的分歧阻碍了达成全面协议。从几个角度考察了这些主要来源。本研究的主要重点在于意识形态作为一个独特的元素及其对其他领域的影响,如教育,福利制度或经济。调查结果显示,两国政治文化截然相反,却缺乏共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BRITAIN AND CONSENSUS POLITICS, 1945-1955: MYTH OR REALITY?
This study lies within the framework of the years 1945-1955, which correspond to Clement Attlee’s Labourite and Winston Churchill’s Conservative administrations. The objective is to demonstrate, by means of an analysis of their speeches and the proposals of their respective political parties, that the ideological differences hindered a total agreement. These primary sources are examined from several perspectives. The main emphasis of this study falls on the ideology as a distinctive element and its influence on other fields such as education, the welfare system or the economy. The results reveal a lack of consensus based on their opposite political cultures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
BRITAIN AND CONSENSUS POLITICS, 1945-1955: MYTH OR REALITY? A COGNITIVE STYLISTIC STUDY OF SELECTED SKITS ON AFRICAN SOCIAL MEDIA/ UN ESTUDIO COGNITIVO ESTILISTICO DE SKITS SELECCIONADOS EN LAS REDES SOCIALES AFRICANAS CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATIONS IN LA PROSE DU TRANSSIBÉRIEN ET DE LA PETITE JEANNE DE FRANCE BY BLAISE CENDRARS EXPLORING BROWN AND LEVINSON’S POLITENESS THEORY AND THE FORM-FUNCTION FIT IN REQUESTS IN JANE AUSTEN’S PRIDE AND PREJUDICE FROM A RELEVANCE-THEORETIC, CONSTRUCTIONIST, AND CONTRASTIVE PERSPECTIVE LANGUAGE, COGNITION AND STYLE: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE COGNITIVE STYLISTICS SECTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1