评估皮肤和软组织感染的抗生素使用及其药敏试验:一项基于医院的横断面研究

Mohammed Fareedullah, Zareen Unnisa, Shajiya Khan, F. Fatima, Afifa Khan, S. Farees, M. Khaleel
{"title":"评估皮肤和软组织感染的抗生素使用及其药敏试验:一项基于医院的横断面研究","authors":"Mohammed Fareedullah, Zareen Unnisa, Shajiya Khan, F. Fatima, Afifa Khan, S. Farees, M. Khaleel","doi":"10.4103/jhrr.jhrr_34_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the antibiotic usage in skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) and to study the sensitivity pattern of identified microorganisms from antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the Inpatient Department of General Surgery at Owaisi Hospital & Research Center, Hyderabad, for 6 months to collect 50 swab samples aseptically from the subjects with diverse SSTIs at the day of admission before the administration of antibiotics, and AST was done using Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method based on the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Results: Of the 50 swab samples, 43 were culture positive and 7 were culture negative, and the highest number of cases was of cellulitis (14.28%). The most commonly isolated pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (30.23%). On the basis of antibiotic sensitivity testing, we found that Ciprofloxacin was the most potent drug, followed by Ceftriaxone and Amikacin, for overall bacterial isolates. In our study, the treatment adhered to IDSA guidelines in 50% of cases and we found that many antibiotics were resistant. In cases of gangrene and abscess, a striking deviation from the guidelines (60% and 77.7%, respectively) was seen. Conclusion: This study guided us toward an appropriate treatment plan for the management of some SSTIs. The disproportionate and tedious use of antibiotics should be abstained as this may drive the evolution of resistant microorganisms that are even more difficult to get rid of.","PeriodicalId":16068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research and Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":"27 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of antibiotic usage in skin and soft-tissue infections and its antimicrobial susceptibility testing: A hospital-based cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Fareedullah, Zareen Unnisa, Shajiya Khan, F. Fatima, Afifa Khan, S. Farees, M. Khaleel\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jhrr.jhrr_34_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To evaluate the antibiotic usage in skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) and to study the sensitivity pattern of identified microorganisms from antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the Inpatient Department of General Surgery at Owaisi Hospital & Research Center, Hyderabad, for 6 months to collect 50 swab samples aseptically from the subjects with diverse SSTIs at the day of admission before the administration of antibiotics, and AST was done using Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method based on the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Results: Of the 50 swab samples, 43 were culture positive and 7 were culture negative, and the highest number of cases was of cellulitis (14.28%). The most commonly isolated pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (30.23%). On the basis of antibiotic sensitivity testing, we found that Ciprofloxacin was the most potent drug, followed by Ceftriaxone and Amikacin, for overall bacterial isolates. In our study, the treatment adhered to IDSA guidelines in 50% of cases and we found that many antibiotics were resistant. In cases of gangrene and abscess, a striking deviation from the guidelines (60% and 77.7%, respectively) was seen. Conclusion: This study guided us toward an appropriate treatment plan for the management of some SSTIs. The disproportionate and tedious use of antibiotics should be abstained as this may drive the evolution of resistant microorganisms that are even more difficult to get rid of.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrr.jhrr_34_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrr.jhrr_34_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价皮肤软组织感染(SSTIs)的抗生素使用情况,并从抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)数据中研究鉴定微生物的药敏模式。材料与方法:本研究在海得拉巴Owaisi医院与研究中心普通外科住院部进行了为期6个月的横断面研究,在给药前,从不同SSTIs患者入院当天无菌采集50份棉签样本,并根据临床实验室标准协会(CLSI)的指南采用Kirby Bauer椎间盘扩散法进行AST。结果:50份拭子标本中培养阳性43例,培养阴性7例,以蜂窝织炎最多(14.28%)。最常见的病原菌为金黄色葡萄球菌(30.23%)。在抗生素敏感性试验的基础上,我们发现环丙沙星是最有效的药物,其次是头孢曲松和阿米卡星。在我们的研究中,50%的病例的治疗符合IDSA指南,我们发现许多抗生素具有耐药性。在坏疽和脓肿的病例中,明显偏离指南(分别为60%和77.7%)。结论:本研究为一些SSTIs的治疗提供了一个合适的治疗方案。应该避免过度和冗长地使用抗生素,因为这可能会导致耐药微生物的进化,而这些微生物更难以消灭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of antibiotic usage in skin and soft-tissue infections and its antimicrobial susceptibility testing: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
Aim: To evaluate the antibiotic usage in skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) and to study the sensitivity pattern of identified microorganisms from antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the Inpatient Department of General Surgery at Owaisi Hospital & Research Center, Hyderabad, for 6 months to collect 50 swab samples aseptically from the subjects with diverse SSTIs at the day of admission before the administration of antibiotics, and AST was done using Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method based on the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Results: Of the 50 swab samples, 43 were culture positive and 7 were culture negative, and the highest number of cases was of cellulitis (14.28%). The most commonly isolated pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (30.23%). On the basis of antibiotic sensitivity testing, we found that Ciprofloxacin was the most potent drug, followed by Ceftriaxone and Amikacin, for overall bacterial isolates. In our study, the treatment adhered to IDSA guidelines in 50% of cases and we found that many antibiotics were resistant. In cases of gangrene and abscess, a striking deviation from the guidelines (60% and 77.7%, respectively) was seen. Conclusion: This study guided us toward an appropriate treatment plan for the management of some SSTIs. The disproportionate and tedious use of antibiotics should be abstained as this may drive the evolution of resistant microorganisms that are even more difficult to get rid of.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of patients with end-stage kidney disease hospitalized with COVID-19: A single-center experience from Eastern India Biological plausibility of spirituality in public health The pH and titration values of commonly used beverages in Trinidad: A cross-sectional study A role of community nurses and challenges faced by them toward providing MCH services in selected blocks in West Bengal: A cross-sectional study Lifestyle changes during the Covid-19 lockdown among young adults in Kerala in terms of physical activity, sleeping habits, and perceived psychological problems: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1