分类和排名搜索引擎结果作为潜在的剽窃来源

Kyle Williams, Hung-Hsuan Chen, C. Lee Giles
{"title":"分类和排名搜索引擎结果作为潜在的剽窃来源","authors":"Kyle Williams, Hung-Hsuan Chen, C. Lee Giles","doi":"10.1145/2644866.2644879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Source retrieval for plagiarism detection involves using a search engine to retrieve candidate sources of plagiarism for a given suspicious document so that more accurate comparisons can be made. An important consideration is that only documents that are likely to be sources of plagiarism should be retrieved so as to minimize the number of unnecessary comparisons made. A supervised strategy for source retrieval is described whereby search results are classified and ranked as potential sources of plagiarism without retrieving the search result documents and using only the information available at search time. The performance of the supervised method is compared to a baseline method and shown to improve precision by up to 3.28%, recall by up to 2.6% and the F1 score by up to 3.37%. Furthermore, features are analyzed to determine which of them are most important for search result classification with features based on document and search result similarity appearing to be the most important.","PeriodicalId":91385,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying and ranking search engine results as potential sources of plagiarism\",\"authors\":\"Kyle Williams, Hung-Hsuan Chen, C. Lee Giles\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2644866.2644879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Source retrieval for plagiarism detection involves using a search engine to retrieve candidate sources of plagiarism for a given suspicious document so that more accurate comparisons can be made. An important consideration is that only documents that are likely to be sources of plagiarism should be retrieved so as to minimize the number of unnecessary comparisons made. A supervised strategy for source retrieval is described whereby search results are classified and ranked as potential sources of plagiarism without retrieving the search result documents and using only the information available at search time. The performance of the supervised method is compared to a baseline method and shown to improve precision by up to 3.28%, recall by up to 2.6% and the F1 score by up to 3.37%. Furthermore, features are analyzed to determine which of them are most important for search result classification with features based on document and search result similarity appearing to be the most important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"97-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2644866.2644879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2644866.2644879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

剽窃检测的来源检索包括使用搜索引擎检索给定可疑文档的候选剽窃来源,以便进行更准确的比较。一个重要的考虑是,只有可能是抄袭来源的文件才应该被检索,以尽量减少不必要的比较次数。本文描述了一种有监督的来源检索策略,在不检索搜索结果文档和仅使用搜索时可用的信息的情况下,将搜索结果分类并排名为潜在的剽窃来源。将监督方法的性能与基线方法进行了比较,结果显示准确率提高了3.28%,召回率提高了2.6%,F1分数提高了3.37%。此外,对特征进行分析,以确定哪些特征对搜索结果分类最重要,其中基于文档的特征和搜索结果相似度似乎是最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classifying and ranking search engine results as potential sources of plagiarism
Source retrieval for plagiarism detection involves using a search engine to retrieve candidate sources of plagiarism for a given suspicious document so that more accurate comparisons can be made. An important consideration is that only documents that are likely to be sources of plagiarism should be retrieved so as to minimize the number of unnecessary comparisons made. A supervised strategy for source retrieval is described whereby search results are classified and ranked as potential sources of plagiarism without retrieving the search result documents and using only the information available at search time. The performance of the supervised method is compared to a baseline method and shown to improve precision by up to 3.28%, recall by up to 2.6% and the F1 score by up to 3.37%. Furthermore, features are analyzed to determine which of them are most important for search result classification with features based on document and search result similarity appearing to be the most important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Notarial Archives, Valletta: Starting from Zero Truncation: all the news that fits we'll print Classifying and ranking search engine results as potential sources of plagiarism An ensemble approach for text document clustering using Wikipedia concepts Document changes: modeling, detection, storage and visualization (DChanges 2014)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1