检查“公平”保留

IF 0.6 3区社会学 Q2 LAW American Bankruptcy Law Journal Pub Date : 2015-02-06 DOI:10.3366/ELR.2016.0320

L. Richardson

{"title":"检查“公平”保留","authors":"L. Richardson","doi":"10.3366/ELR.2016.0320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The operation of compensation, whereby a liquid debt reduces or extinguishes a liquid debt, is well understood, as is retention of a sum due under a contract on the principle of mutuality. Less understood is the doctrine of retention of debts, the so-called “other type of retention” or “equitable” retention discussed in obiter remarks by Lord Rodger in the UK Supreme Court decision in Inveresk plc v Tullis Russell Papermakers Ltd [2010] UKSC 19. This form of “equitable” retention is the subject of a detailed study by Lorna Richardson in this article.","PeriodicalId":44862,"journal":{"name":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining 'Equitable' Retention\",\"authors\":\"L. Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/ELR.2016.0320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The operation of compensation, whereby a liquid debt reduces or extinguishes a liquid debt, is well understood, as is retention of a sum due under a contract on the principle of mutuality. Less understood is the doctrine of retention of debts, the so-called “other type of retention” or “equitable” retention discussed in obiter remarks by Lord Rodger in the UK Supreme Court decision in Inveresk plc v Tullis Russell Papermakers Ltd [2010] UKSC 19. This form of “equitable” retention is the subject of a detailed study by Lorna Richardson in this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Bankruptcy Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Bankruptcy Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/ELR.2016.0320\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ELR.2016.0320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

补偿的运作，即流动债务减少或消灭流动债务，是很容易理解的，就像根据互惠原则保留合同项下的到期款项一样。不太了解的是保留债务的原则，即所谓的“其他类型的保留”或“公平的”保留，罗杰勋爵在英国最高法院对Inveresk plc诉Tullis Russell Papermakers Ltd [2010] UKSC 19的判决中发表了激烈的评论。Lorna Richardson在本文中详细研究了这种形式的“公平”留存。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Examining 'Equitable' Retention

The operation of compensation, whereby a liquid debt reduces or extinguishes a liquid debt, is well understood, as is retention of a sum due under a contract on the principle of mutuality. Less understood is the doctrine of retention of debts, the so-called “other type of retention” or “equitable” retention discussed in obiter remarks by Lord Rodger in the UK Supreme Court decision in Inveresk plc v Tullis Russell Papermakers Ltd [2010] UKSC 19. This form of “equitable” retention is the subject of a detailed study by Lorna Richardson in this article.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊