韩国的烛光抗议:一种动态的争论方式

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Social Movement Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-21 DOI:10.1080/14742837.2022.2053515
J. Jung
{"title":"韩国的烛光抗议:一种动态的争论方式","authors":"J. Jung","doi":"10.1080/14742837.2022.2053515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT About 17 million people participated in candlelight protests from October 2016 to April 2017 in South Korea calling for the president’s impeachment. In this episode, the president was, indeed, impeached through constitutional procedures for the first time in Korean history, and an early presidential election was held after the contentious episode was over. How can we explain this massive mobilization of candlelight protests in South Korea? Using a dynamics of contention approach, this article decomposes the mobilization process of candlelight protests into three mechanisms – attribution of political opportunities, shift in elite alignment, and expansion of mobilization networks. These mechanisms interacted and reinforced one another in the mobilization process of candlelight rallies for six months. This article traces these mechanisms by using various sources, including protest event data, public opinion data, documents by the national coalition for candlelight protests, and news media accounts.","PeriodicalId":47507,"journal":{"name":"Social Movement Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"767 - 785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The candlelight protests in South Korea: a dynamics of contention approach\",\"authors\":\"J. Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14742837.2022.2053515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT About 17 million people participated in candlelight protests from October 2016 to April 2017 in South Korea calling for the president’s impeachment. In this episode, the president was, indeed, impeached through constitutional procedures for the first time in Korean history, and an early presidential election was held after the contentious episode was over. How can we explain this massive mobilization of candlelight protests in South Korea? Using a dynamics of contention approach, this article decomposes the mobilization process of candlelight protests into three mechanisms – attribution of political opportunities, shift in elite alignment, and expansion of mobilization networks. These mechanisms interacted and reinforced one another in the mobilization process of candlelight rallies for six months. This article traces these mechanisms by using various sources, including protest event data, public opinion data, documents by the national coalition for candlelight protests, and news media accounts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Movement Studies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"767 - 785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Movement Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2053515\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Movement Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2053515","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2016年10月至2017年4月,韩国约有1700万人参加了烛光抗议活动,要求弹劾总统。在这一事件中,韩国历史上第一次通过宪法程序弹劾了总统,并在争议事件结束后提前举行了总统选举。如何解释韩国大规模的烛光示威?本文运用动态争论的方法,将烛光抗议的动员过程分解为三种机制——政治机会的归属、精英联盟的转移和动员网络的扩展。在长达6个月的烛光集会动员过程中,这些机制相互作用、相互强化。本文通过使用各种来源,包括抗议事件数据、民意数据、全国烛光抗议联盟的文件和新闻媒体报道,来追踪这些机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The candlelight protests in South Korea: a dynamics of contention approach
ABSTRACT About 17 million people participated in candlelight protests from October 2016 to April 2017 in South Korea calling for the president’s impeachment. In this episode, the president was, indeed, impeached through constitutional procedures for the first time in Korean history, and an early presidential election was held after the contentious episode was over. How can we explain this massive mobilization of candlelight protests in South Korea? Using a dynamics of contention approach, this article decomposes the mobilization process of candlelight protests into three mechanisms – attribution of political opportunities, shift in elite alignment, and expansion of mobilization networks. These mechanisms interacted and reinforced one another in the mobilization process of candlelight rallies for six months. This article traces these mechanisms by using various sources, including protest event data, public opinion data, documents by the national coalition for candlelight protests, and news media accounts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Achieving Organizationality Through Authorship Affordances — A Communicative Episode of Telegram Polling from 2019 Hong Kong If at first, you don’t succeed: Strategies used by environmental activist volunteer leaders to overcome failure PROFILE: Revisiting the social movement society in a time of datafication Action dilemmas in prefigurative politics: making prefiguration feasible in Sweden The future is now. An introduction to prefigurative politics The future is now. An introduction to prefigurative politics , edited by Lara Monticelli and published by Bristol, UK, Bristol University Press, 2022, 276 pp., £80.00 (hardback), £26.99 (paperback), ISBN: 978-1529215663
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1