国际知识产权合同中的可仲裁性经济学

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce Pub Date : 2019-04-24 DOI:10.5195/JLC.2019.164
Miquel dels Sants Mirambell Fargas
{"title":"国际知识产权合同中的可仲裁性经济学","authors":"Miquel dels Sants Mirambell Fargas","doi":"10.5195/JLC.2019.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IP arbitrability in international commercial disputes enshrines the friction between traders and holders, between private contracts and public registers, between party autonomy and mandatory rules. Particularly, non‑arbitrability of invalidity defenses concerning registered industrial intellectual property rights has been insufficiently analyzed as a crucial matter of recognition and enforcement of international awards. Consequently, a sound economic rationale on grounds of competitive advantages is disregarded in too many instances. Having regarded the ever‑growing importance of IP rights for companies’ productivity and today’s primary use of arbitration in cross‑border contracting, the present research aims at pointing that out. It applies a transaction cost economics approach and takes into account the legal comparative background. The study finally examines arbitrability of IP validity with inter‑partes effect as an operable solution and the advantages of a predictable model as was early adopted by the United States.","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economics of Arbitrability in International IP Contracting\",\"authors\":\"Miquel dels Sants Mirambell Fargas\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/JLC.2019.164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IP arbitrability in international commercial disputes enshrines the friction between traders and holders, between private contracts and public registers, between party autonomy and mandatory rules. Particularly, non‑arbitrability of invalidity defenses concerning registered industrial intellectual property rights has been insufficiently analyzed as a crucial matter of recognition and enforcement of international awards. Consequently, a sound economic rationale on grounds of competitive advantages is disregarded in too many instances. Having regarded the ever‑growing importance of IP rights for companies’ productivity and today’s primary use of arbitration in cross‑border contracting, the present research aims at pointing that out. It applies a transaction cost economics approach and takes into account the legal comparative background. The study finally examines arbitrability of IP validity with inter‑partes effect as an operable solution and the advantages of a predictable model as was early adopted by the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2019.164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2019.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际商业纠纷中的知识产权可仲裁性体现了贸易商与持有人之间、私人合同与公共登记之间、当事人自治与强制性规则之间的摩擦。特别是,关于已注册工业知识产权的无效抗辩的不可仲裁性,作为承认和执行国际裁决的一个关键问题,一直没有得到充分的分析。因此,以竞争优势为基础的合理经济理论在太多情况下被忽视了。考虑到知识产权对公司生产力日益增长的重要性以及今天仲裁在跨境合同中的主要应用,本研究旨在指出这一点。它采用交易成本经济学方法,并考虑到法律比较背景。本研究最后考察了知识产权有效性的可仲裁性,并将其作为一种可操作的解决方案,以及美国早期采用的可预测模式的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economics of Arbitrability in International IP Contracting
IP arbitrability in international commercial disputes enshrines the friction between traders and holders, between private contracts and public registers, between party autonomy and mandatory rules. Particularly, non‑arbitrability of invalidity defenses concerning registered industrial intellectual property rights has been insufficiently analyzed as a crucial matter of recognition and enforcement of international awards. Consequently, a sound economic rationale on grounds of competitive advantages is disregarded in too many instances. Having regarded the ever‑growing importance of IP rights for companies’ productivity and today’s primary use of arbitration in cross‑border contracting, the present research aims at pointing that out. It applies a transaction cost economics approach and takes into account the legal comparative background. The study finally examines arbitrability of IP validity with inter‑partes effect as an operable solution and the advantages of a predictable model as was early adopted by the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter Volume 41 Issue 2 The Right Visa at the Right Time: Proposing a Targeted Special Immigrant Visa as a Flexible Tool for Practical Immigration Reform Court-Ordered Interim Measures in International Arbitration: A Comparative Approach Rethinking Decentralized Antitrust Regimes: A Window on the Future of Protectionism and Overregulation Rise and Fall of Ordinary Course Covenants and MAE Clauses: Case and Trend Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1