神经艺术史:对历史资料的几个注释

A. Milosavljević
{"title":"神经艺术史:对历史资料的几个注释","authors":"A. Milosavljević","doi":"10.25038/am.v0i29.539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his proposal for a new methodological approach to the history of art, neuroarthistory, art historian John Onians based his argument in philosophy and art theory ranging from Aristotle to Leonardo, and from Reynolds to Zeki, and neuroaesthetics. However, he omitted from his overview the late Renaissance and Baroque traditions in which one can easily find writings on human cognitive ability (on intellect, senses, and imagination) and its bearings on art. In this preliminary note, we point to several 16th-century humanists, such as Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola, Baldassare Castiglione, Benedetto Varchi, and artist and theorist Federico Zuccari, in whose treatments of human cognitive ability we find the application of Aristotelian tradition. Their writings further illuminate the rich and exciting insights into the nature, workings, and results of human cognition.\nArticle received: May 21, 2022; Article accepted: July 15, 2022; Published online: October 15, 2022; Original scholarly paper","PeriodicalId":40461,"journal":{"name":"AM Journal of Art and Media Studies","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroarthistory: Several Notes on Historical Sources\",\"authors\":\"A. Milosavljević\",\"doi\":\"10.25038/am.v0i29.539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his proposal for a new methodological approach to the history of art, neuroarthistory, art historian John Onians based his argument in philosophy and art theory ranging from Aristotle to Leonardo, and from Reynolds to Zeki, and neuroaesthetics. However, he omitted from his overview the late Renaissance and Baroque traditions in which one can easily find writings on human cognitive ability (on intellect, senses, and imagination) and its bearings on art. In this preliminary note, we point to several 16th-century humanists, such as Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola, Baldassare Castiglione, Benedetto Varchi, and artist and theorist Federico Zuccari, in whose treatments of human cognitive ability we find the application of Aristotelian tradition. Their writings further illuminate the rich and exciting insights into the nature, workings, and results of human cognition.\\nArticle received: May 21, 2022; Article accepted: July 15, 2022; Published online: October 15, 2022; Original scholarly paper\",\"PeriodicalId\":40461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AM Journal of Art and Media Studies\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AM Journal of Art and Media Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i29.539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AM Journal of Art and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i29.539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在他提出的一种新的艺术史方法论——神经艺术史的建议中,艺术史学家John Onians将他的论点建立在哲学和艺术理论的基础上,这些理论从亚里士多德到达芬奇,从雷诺兹到泽克,以及神经美学。然而,在他的概述中,他忽略了文艺复兴晚期和巴洛克传统,在这些传统中,人们很容易找到关于人类认知能力(智力、感官和想象力)及其与艺术的关系的著作。在这篇初步的笔记中,我们指出了几位16世纪的人文主义者,如Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola, Baldassare Castiglione, Benedetto Varchi和艺术家兼理论家Federico Zuccari,在他们对人类认知能力的治疗中,我们发现了亚里士多德传统的应用。他们的著作进一步阐明了对人类认知的本质、运作和结果的丰富而令人兴奋的见解。收稿日期:2022年5月21日;录用日期:2022年7月15日;在线发布:2022年10月15日;原创学术论文
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuroarthistory: Several Notes on Historical Sources
In his proposal for a new methodological approach to the history of art, neuroarthistory, art historian John Onians based his argument in philosophy and art theory ranging from Aristotle to Leonardo, and from Reynolds to Zeki, and neuroaesthetics. However, he omitted from his overview the late Renaissance and Baroque traditions in which one can easily find writings on human cognitive ability (on intellect, senses, and imagination) and its bearings on art. In this preliminary note, we point to several 16th-century humanists, such as Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola, Baldassare Castiglione, Benedetto Varchi, and artist and theorist Federico Zuccari, in whose treatments of human cognitive ability we find the application of Aristotelian tradition. Their writings further illuminate the rich and exciting insights into the nature, workings, and results of human cognition. Article received: May 21, 2022; Article accepted: July 15, 2022; Published online: October 15, 2022; Original scholarly paper
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gender Critique of The Scientific and Medical Construction of the Female Body in Women’s Artworks An Online Photovoice Study Designed by Researchers from Art and Social Work to Better Understand the Experience of Chronic Pain by Women of Color Early Modern Art and Science: Simulation of Dissections in the 16th Century Fugitive Sheets Care to Cure: Voices of Sick Bodies in the film The Good Nurse (2022) Transgenic Embryo Implantation Excerpts from The Life Cycle of The Programmed Mouse, an Art and Biology Residency in an Experimental Animal Production and Research Facility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1