q因子引导与标准FS-LASIK术后角膜非球状度与视力质量的临床研究

Xue-qun Huang
{"title":"q因子引导与标准FS-LASIK术后角膜非球状度与视力质量的临床研究","authors":"Xue-qun Huang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo compare the differences in corneal asphericity and contrast sensitivity under different conditions before and after Q-value-guided femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and standard FS-LASIK for myopia, and evaluation of the efficacy of the two surgical methods for treating myopia. \n \n \nMethods: \nThis was a prospective cohort study. A total of 64 moderate and low myopia patients (33 patients, 64 eyes, in the Q-guided group and 31 patients, 62 eyes, in the standard group) who were treated by FS-LASIK were selected from Laser Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, during the same period. Visual acuity, Q-value, corneal aberration and contrast sensitivity were measured and compared before and after surgery. All the cases were followed up at 1 and 3 months. A repeated measures analysis of variance, t-test and rank sum test were used for data analysis. \n \n \nResults: \nThere was no statistically significant difference for the data before surgery. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and residual refractive error of all eyes were not significantly different between the two groups after 3 months of follow-up. In the corneal 6 mm range, there was no significant difference in Q-value, spherical aberration or coma between the two groups at 3 months postoperatively. In the corneal 4.5 mm range, the Q-values and spherical aberrations of the Q-value-guided group were significantly less than that for the standard LASIK group (tSA=2.00, P=0.04; tQ=2.28, P=0.03). After surgery, contrast sensitivity in the two groups returned to preoperative levels at different spatial frequencies in various environments, and it tended to be stable at 3 months after surgery. At 3 months after surgery, the visual quality of the Q-value-guided group was better than that of the standard group under mesopic circumstances with glare (Z3 c/d=-2.0, P=0.044; Z6 c/d=-2.1, P=0.034). \n \n \nConclusions: \nQ-value-guided LASIK for myopia and astigmatism is as safe and effective as standard FS-LASIK. Further more, Q-value-guided LASIK results in better visual quality than standard FS-LASIK under mesopic circumstances with glare. \n \n \nKey words: \nlaser in situ keratomileusis; femtosecond laser; wavefront aberration; visual quality","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"12 1","pages":"514-520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Study of Corneal Asphericity and Visual Quality after Q-Factor-Guided and Standard FS-LASIK\",\"authors\":\"Xue-qun Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\nTo compare the differences in corneal asphericity and contrast sensitivity under different conditions before and after Q-value-guided femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and standard FS-LASIK for myopia, and evaluation of the efficacy of the two surgical methods for treating myopia. \\n \\n \\nMethods: \\nThis was a prospective cohort study. A total of 64 moderate and low myopia patients (33 patients, 64 eyes, in the Q-guided group and 31 patients, 62 eyes, in the standard group) who were treated by FS-LASIK were selected from Laser Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, during the same period. Visual acuity, Q-value, corneal aberration and contrast sensitivity were measured and compared before and after surgery. All the cases were followed up at 1 and 3 months. A repeated measures analysis of variance, t-test and rank sum test were used for data analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults: \\nThere was no statistically significant difference for the data before surgery. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and residual refractive error of all eyes were not significantly different between the two groups after 3 months of follow-up. In the corneal 6 mm range, there was no significant difference in Q-value, spherical aberration or coma between the two groups at 3 months postoperatively. In the corneal 4.5 mm range, the Q-values and spherical aberrations of the Q-value-guided group were significantly less than that for the standard LASIK group (tSA=2.00, P=0.04; tQ=2.28, P=0.03). After surgery, contrast sensitivity in the two groups returned to preoperative levels at different spatial frequencies in various environments, and it tended to be stable at 3 months after surgery. At 3 months after surgery, the visual quality of the Q-value-guided group was better than that of the standard group under mesopic circumstances with glare (Z3 c/d=-2.0, P=0.044; Z6 c/d=-2.1, P=0.034). \\n \\n \\nConclusions: \\nQ-value-guided LASIK for myopia and astigmatism is as safe and effective as standard FS-LASIK. Further more, Q-value-guided LASIK results in better visual quality than standard FS-LASIK under mesopic circumstances with glare. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nlaser in situ keratomileusis; femtosecond laser; wavefront aberration; visual quality\",\"PeriodicalId\":10142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"514-520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较q值引导飞秒激光原位角膜磨除术(FS-LASIK)与标准飞秒激光原位角膜磨除术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视前后不同条件下角膜非球状度和对比敏感度的差异,并评价两种手术方式治疗近视的疗效。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究。选取同期在安徽医科大学第一附属医院激光中心行FS-LASIK手术的中低度近视患者64例(q引导组33例,64眼,标准组31例,62眼)。术后测定视力、q值、角膜像差、对比敏感度。随访时间分别为1个月和3个月。资料分析采用重复测量方差分析、t检验和秩和检验。结果:术前数据比较,差异无统计学意义。随访3个月后,两组患者所有眼的未矫正视力(UCVA)和残余屈光不正均无显著差异。在角膜6mm范围内,两组术后3个月的q值、球差、昏迷无显著差异。在角膜4.5 mm范围内,q值引导组的q值和球差明显小于标准LASIK组(tSA=2.00, P=0.04;tQ = 2.28, P = 0.03)。术后两组患者在不同环境下不同空间频率的对比敏感度均恢复到术前水平,并在术后3个月趋于稳定。术后3个月,强光中观情况下,q值引导组视觉质量优于标准组(Z3 c/d=-2.0, P=0.044;Z6 c/d=-2.1, P=0.034)。结论:q值引导LASIK治疗近视和散光与标准FS-LASIK一样安全有效。此外,q值引导的LASIK在中视环境下的视觉质量优于标准的FS-LASIK。关键词:激光原位角膜磨镶术;飞秒激光;波前像差;视觉质量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Study of Corneal Asphericity and Visual Quality after Q-Factor-Guided and Standard FS-LASIK
Objective: To compare the differences in corneal asphericity and contrast sensitivity under different conditions before and after Q-value-guided femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and standard FS-LASIK for myopia, and evaluation of the efficacy of the two surgical methods for treating myopia. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 64 moderate and low myopia patients (33 patients, 64 eyes, in the Q-guided group and 31 patients, 62 eyes, in the standard group) who were treated by FS-LASIK were selected from Laser Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, during the same period. Visual acuity, Q-value, corneal aberration and contrast sensitivity were measured and compared before and after surgery. All the cases were followed up at 1 and 3 months. A repeated measures analysis of variance, t-test and rank sum test were used for data analysis. Results: There was no statistically significant difference for the data before surgery. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and residual refractive error of all eyes were not significantly different between the two groups after 3 months of follow-up. In the corneal 6 mm range, there was no significant difference in Q-value, spherical aberration or coma between the two groups at 3 months postoperatively. In the corneal 4.5 mm range, the Q-values and spherical aberrations of the Q-value-guided group were significantly less than that for the standard LASIK group (tSA=2.00, P=0.04; tQ=2.28, P=0.03). After surgery, contrast sensitivity in the two groups returned to preoperative levels at different spatial frequencies in various environments, and it tended to be stable at 3 months after surgery. At 3 months after surgery, the visual quality of the Q-value-guided group was better than that of the standard group under mesopic circumstances with glare (Z3 c/d=-2.0, P=0.044; Z6 c/d=-2.1, P=0.034). Conclusions: Q-value-guided LASIK for myopia and astigmatism is as safe and effective as standard FS-LASIK. Further more, Q-value-guided LASIK results in better visual quality than standard FS-LASIK under mesopic circumstances with glare. Key words: laser in situ keratomileusis; femtosecond laser; wavefront aberration; visual quality
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Practice and Effectiveness of COVID-19 RNA Detection in the Prevention and Control of Ophthalmic Hospital Correct Choice of Goggles and Anti-fog Guidance Duringthe Epidemic Period of COVID-19 2019-nCoV and Eye, What We Know and What We Should Do Clinical Application Value of a Preset Marking Line in Lacrimal Endoscopic Surgery Characteristics of Macular Microvascular Changes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1