使用数字键盘的基于用户身份验证的击键动力学

B. Saini, Navdeep Kaur, K. Bhatia
{"title":"使用数字键盘的基于用户身份验证的击键动力学","authors":"B. Saini, Navdeep Kaur, K. Bhatia","doi":"10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keystroke dynamics is the study to identify/authenticate a person based on his/her typing rhythms, which are inferred from keystroke events like key-press and key-release. A lot of research work has been done in this field where the researchers have used either only alphabetic or alphanumeric or only numeric inputs. In this paper we address the question — What is the best possible numeric input for authentication using keystroke dynamics. We accomplished this by making the users enter four different numbers. Each number consisted of 8-digits. Out of these four numbers two were random numbers while the other two were formed using digits which had some pattern to them. Random Forest and Naive Bayes were used as classifiers. The results showed that using Random Forest classifier yielded best results when a random number is taken as input. The study also proved that a combination of hold time and latency as features yielded improved results. We achieved an average false acceptance rate of 2.7% and false rejection rate of 35.9%.","PeriodicalId":6651,"journal":{"name":"2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering - Confluence","volume":"51 1","pages":"25-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keystroke dynamics based user authentication using numeric keypad\",\"authors\":\"B. Saini, Navdeep Kaur, K. Bhatia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Keystroke dynamics is the study to identify/authenticate a person based on his/her typing rhythms, which are inferred from keystroke events like key-press and key-release. A lot of research work has been done in this field where the researchers have used either only alphabetic or alphanumeric or only numeric inputs. In this paper we address the question — What is the best possible numeric input for authentication using keystroke dynamics. We accomplished this by making the users enter four different numbers. Each number consisted of 8-digits. Out of these four numbers two were random numbers while the other two were formed using digits which had some pattern to them. Random Forest and Naive Bayes were used as classifiers. The results showed that using Random Forest classifier yielded best results when a random number is taken as input. The study also proved that a combination of hold time and latency as features yielded improved results. We achieved an average false acceptance rate of 2.7% and false rejection rate of 35.9%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering - Confluence\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"25-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering - Confluence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering - Confluence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

击键动力学是根据一个人的打字节奏来识别/认证他/她的研究,这是从击键事件(如按键和释放键)中推断出来的。在这个领域已经做了大量的研究工作,研究人员要么只使用字母或字母数字输入,要么只使用数字输入。在本文中,我们解决了这个问题-使用击键动力学进行身份验证的最佳数字输入是什么。我们通过让用户输入四个不同的数字来实现这一点。每个数字由8位数字组成。在这四个数字中,有两个是随机数,而另外两个是由具有某种模式的数字组成的。使用随机森林和朴素贝叶斯作为分类器。结果表明,以随机数为输入时,使用随机森林分类器的分类效果最好。该研究还证明,将保持时间和延迟作为特征的组合会产生更好的结果。平均误接受率为2.7%,误拒率为35.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Keystroke dynamics based user authentication using numeric keypad
Keystroke dynamics is the study to identify/authenticate a person based on his/her typing rhythms, which are inferred from keystroke events like key-press and key-release. A lot of research work has been done in this field where the researchers have used either only alphabetic or alphanumeric or only numeric inputs. In this paper we address the question — What is the best possible numeric input for authentication using keystroke dynamics. We accomplished this by making the users enter four different numbers. Each number consisted of 8-digits. Out of these four numbers two were random numbers while the other two were formed using digits which had some pattern to them. Random Forest and Naive Bayes were used as classifiers. The results showed that using Random Forest classifier yielded best results when a random number is taken as input. The study also proved that a combination of hold time and latency as features yielded improved results. We achieved an average false acceptance rate of 2.7% and false rejection rate of 35.9%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hydrological Modelling to Inform Forest Management: Moving Beyond Equivalent Clearcut Area Enhanced feature mining and classifier models to predict customer churn for an E-retailer Towards the practical design of performance-aware resilient wireless NoC architectures Adaptive virtual MIMO single cluster optimization in a small cell Software effort estimation using machine learning techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1