语义学治疗效果的普遍化(而非维持)可能因原发性进行性失语症变体而异1

R. Jokel
{"title":"语义学治疗效果的普遍化(而非维持)可能因原发性进行性失语症变体而异1","authors":"R. Jokel","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2019.1666492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies with the following designs were eligible: Randomized control trials, non-randomized studies, case–control studies, controlled before-and-after studies, interrupted time–series studies, case series, and single-subject studies. To be included, the study also needed to focus on semantic treatment, report maintenance, and generalization outcomes, and involve participants study who were diagnosed with one of the three PPA variants. Studies were excluded if they did not meet the design criteria (i.e. qualitative studies, non-experimental studies, reviews) or failed to meet the standards of peer-reviewed articles (i.e. clinical notes, conference proceedings, and studies published as book chapters). Studies focused on surgical interventions, brain stimulation, combined interventions, and pharmacological treatment were excluded as well.","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"31 1","pages":"187 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalization (but not maintenance) of treatment gains from semantic therapy may differ by primary progressive aphasia variant1\",\"authors\":\"R. Jokel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17489539.2019.1666492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies with the following designs were eligible: Randomized control trials, non-randomized studies, case–control studies, controlled before-and-after studies, interrupted time–series studies, case series, and single-subject studies. To be included, the study also needed to focus on semantic treatment, report maintenance, and generalization outcomes, and involve participants study who were diagnosed with one of the three PPA variants. Studies were excluded if they did not meet the design criteria (i.e. qualitative studies, non-experimental studies, reviews) or failed to meet the standards of peer-reviewed articles (i.e. clinical notes, conference proceedings, and studies published as book chapters). Studies focused on surgical interventions, brain stimulation, combined interventions, and pharmacological treatment were excluded as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2019.1666492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2019.1666492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

下列设计的研究符合条件:随机对照试验、非随机研究、病例对照研究、前后对照研究、中断时间序列研究、病例序列和单受试者研究。为了纳入研究,该研究还需要关注语义治疗、报告维护和泛化结果,并涉及被诊断患有三种PPA变体之一的参与者。不符合设计标准(即定性研究、非实验研究、综述)或不符合同行评议文章标准(即临床记录、会议记录和作为书籍章节发表的研究)的研究被排除。手术干预、脑刺激、联合干预和药物治疗的研究也被排除在外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generalization (but not maintenance) of treatment gains from semantic therapy may differ by primary progressive aphasia variant1
Studies with the following designs were eligible: Randomized control trials, non-randomized studies, case–control studies, controlled before-and-after studies, interrupted time–series studies, case series, and single-subject studies. To be included, the study also needed to focus on semantic treatment, report maintenance, and generalization outcomes, and involve participants study who were diagnosed with one of the three PPA variants. Studies were excluded if they did not meet the design criteria (i.e. qualitative studies, non-experimental studies, reviews) or failed to meet the standards of peer-reviewed articles (i.e. clinical notes, conference proceedings, and studies published as book chapters). Studies focused on surgical interventions, brain stimulation, combined interventions, and pharmacological treatment were excluded as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.
期刊最新文献
Illusions of literacy in nonspeaking autistic people: a response to Jaswal, Lampi & Stockwell, 2024 Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder with marked ingressive speech: a prospective case study Initial results of single-case design study indicate parent training on naturalistic behavioral intervention conducted via telehealth improves parent fidelity and collateral child mands, tacts and intraverbals Preliminary evidence a behavior chain interruption strategy is a promising approach for teaching functional mands to individuals with deaf-blindness and an intellectual disability Can message-passing anecdotes tell us anything about the validity of RPM and S2C?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1