{"title":"语义学治疗效果的普遍化(而非维持)可能因原发性进行性失语症变体而异1","authors":"R. Jokel","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2019.1666492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies with the following designs were eligible: Randomized control trials, non-randomized studies, case–control studies, controlled before-and-after studies, interrupted time–series studies, case series, and single-subject studies. To be included, the study also needed to focus on semantic treatment, report maintenance, and generalization outcomes, and involve participants study who were diagnosed with one of the three PPA variants. Studies were excluded if they did not meet the design criteria (i.e. qualitative studies, non-experimental studies, reviews) or failed to meet the standards of peer-reviewed articles (i.e. clinical notes, conference proceedings, and studies published as book chapters). Studies focused on surgical interventions, brain stimulation, combined interventions, and pharmacological treatment were excluded as well.","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"31 1","pages":"187 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalization (but not maintenance) of treatment gains from semantic therapy may differ by primary progressive aphasia variant1\",\"authors\":\"R. Jokel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17489539.2019.1666492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies with the following designs were eligible: Randomized control trials, non-randomized studies, case–control studies, controlled before-and-after studies, interrupted time–series studies, case series, and single-subject studies. To be included, the study also needed to focus on semantic treatment, report maintenance, and generalization outcomes, and involve participants study who were diagnosed with one of the three PPA variants. Studies were excluded if they did not meet the design criteria (i.e. qualitative studies, non-experimental studies, reviews) or failed to meet the standards of peer-reviewed articles (i.e. clinical notes, conference proceedings, and studies published as book chapters). Studies focused on surgical interventions, brain stimulation, combined interventions, and pharmacological treatment were excluded as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2019.1666492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2019.1666492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Generalization (but not maintenance) of treatment gains from semantic therapy may differ by primary progressive aphasia variant1
Studies with the following designs were eligible: Randomized control trials, non-randomized studies, case–control studies, controlled before-and-after studies, interrupted time–series studies, case series, and single-subject studies. To be included, the study also needed to focus on semantic treatment, report maintenance, and generalization outcomes, and involve participants study who were diagnosed with one of the three PPA variants. Studies were excluded if they did not meet the design criteria (i.e. qualitative studies, non-experimental studies, reviews) or failed to meet the standards of peer-reviewed articles (i.e. clinical notes, conference proceedings, and studies published as book chapters). Studies focused on surgical interventions, brain stimulation, combined interventions, and pharmacological treatment were excluded as well.
期刊介绍:
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.