基于批判性素养的阅读教学:见解与挑战

L. Hakim, Sadieli Telaumbanua, Nurul Farida, Muhamad Syamsul Taufik, Marfu’ah Laswaniyah, Bayu Pasupati
{"title":"基于批判性素养的阅读教学:见解与挑战","authors":"L. Hakim, Sadieli Telaumbanua, Nurul Farida, Muhamad Syamsul Taufik, Marfu’ah Laswaniyah, Bayu Pasupati","doi":"10.31838/SRP.2021.3.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching reading in the Indonesian educational system still focuses only on the comprehension and vocabulary exercises and does not encourage learners to become critical thinkers in reading the text. Critical literacy-based instruction is a critical thinking development technique that helps students become active meaning-makers. This study investigated teachers’ understanding and challenges on critical literacy-based instruction in teaching reading. In this case study, the research questionnaire and interview were used as instruments of data collection. The data collected from the respondents were gathered together to be analyzed using qualitative analysis of interactive models. The result of this study shows that some teachers were in misconception about critical literacy. They are also difficult to differentiate the concept of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and critical literacy. Besides, they face several obstacles and challenges in implementing critical literacy-based instruction in teaching reading. Mostly, when they asked students to evaluate multiple texts to study how the story changes when told from different perspectives, read from a resistant perspective, and produce counter texts. Enhancing students’ critical thinking ability in reading can be approached from three perspectives; critical thinking, critical pedagogy, and critical literacy. This study only focused on critical literacy in teaching reading. This study will be preliminary inputs for the readers or other researchers to further study in a similar research area with different interests.","PeriodicalId":22121,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Literacy-Based Instruction In Teaching Reading: Insights And Challenges\",\"authors\":\"L. Hakim, Sadieli Telaumbanua, Nurul Farida, Muhamad Syamsul Taufik, Marfu’ah Laswaniyah, Bayu Pasupati\",\"doi\":\"10.31838/SRP.2021.3.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teaching reading in the Indonesian educational system still focuses only on the comprehension and vocabulary exercises and does not encourage learners to become critical thinkers in reading the text. Critical literacy-based instruction is a critical thinking development technique that helps students become active meaning-makers. This study investigated teachers’ understanding and challenges on critical literacy-based instruction in teaching reading. In this case study, the research questionnaire and interview were used as instruments of data collection. The data collected from the respondents were gathered together to be analyzed using qualitative analysis of interactive models. The result of this study shows that some teachers were in misconception about critical literacy. They are also difficult to differentiate the concept of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and critical literacy. Besides, they face several obstacles and challenges in implementing critical literacy-based instruction in teaching reading. Mostly, when they asked students to evaluate multiple texts to study how the story changes when told from different perspectives, read from a resistant perspective, and produce counter texts. Enhancing students’ critical thinking ability in reading can be approached from three perspectives; critical thinking, critical pedagogy, and critical literacy. This study only focused on critical literacy in teaching reading. This study will be preliminary inputs for the readers or other researchers to further study in a similar research area with different interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31838/SRP.2021.3.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31838/SRP.2021.3.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

印尼教育系统的阅读教学仍然只注重理解和词汇练习,而不鼓励学习者成为阅读文本的批判性思考者。基于批判性素养的教学是一种批判性思维发展技巧,帮助学生成为积极的意义创造者。本研究探讨教师在阅读教学中对批判性素养教学的理解与挑战。在本案例研究中,研究问卷和访谈作为数据收集的工具。从受访者收集的数据被收集在一起,使用交互模型的定性分析进行分析。本研究结果显示,部分教师对批判性素养存在误解。他们也很难区分高阶思维技能(HOTS)和批判性素养的概念。此外,在阅读教学中实施批判性素养教学也面临着一些障碍和挑战。大多数情况下,当他们要求学生评估多个文本,研究故事在从不同角度讲述时是如何变化的,从一个抗拒的角度阅读,并产生相反的文本。提高学生阅读中的批判性思维能力可以从三个方面入手;批判性思维,批判性教学法,批判性素养。本研究仅关注阅读教学中的批判性素养。本研究将为读者或其他研究人员在相似的研究领域以不同的兴趣进一步研究提供初步的输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical Literacy-Based Instruction In Teaching Reading: Insights And Challenges
Teaching reading in the Indonesian educational system still focuses only on the comprehension and vocabulary exercises and does not encourage learners to become critical thinkers in reading the text. Critical literacy-based instruction is a critical thinking development technique that helps students become active meaning-makers. This study investigated teachers’ understanding and challenges on critical literacy-based instruction in teaching reading. In this case study, the research questionnaire and interview were used as instruments of data collection. The data collected from the respondents were gathered together to be analyzed using qualitative analysis of interactive models. The result of this study shows that some teachers were in misconception about critical literacy. They are also difficult to differentiate the concept of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and critical literacy. Besides, they face several obstacles and challenges in implementing critical literacy-based instruction in teaching reading. Mostly, when they asked students to evaluate multiple texts to study how the story changes when told from different perspectives, read from a resistant perspective, and produce counter texts. Enhancing students’ critical thinking ability in reading can be approached from three perspectives; critical thinking, critical pedagogy, and critical literacy. This study only focused on critical literacy in teaching reading. This study will be preliminary inputs for the readers or other researchers to further study in a similar research area with different interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New UV Curable Acrylated Urethane-Oligoesters Derived From Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) PET Waste Effects of Terminalia chebula Retz. on the Secretion of Somatostatin in the Small Intestine in Mice Analysis of Level of Antioxidants and Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Patients Metabolomics Of Metformin's Cardioprotective Effect In Acute Doxorubicin Induced- Cardiotoxicity In Rats Cases of Adolescent Sudden Cardiac Death During Physical Exercise: Autopsy, Histological Findings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1