乌克兰危机背景下塞尔维亚亲俄主义的建构

Eugenia-Maria Magurean
{"title":"乌克兰危机背景下塞尔维亚亲俄主义的建构","authors":"Eugenia-Maria Magurean","doi":"10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the background of the Ukrainian crisis, the relations between Russia and the Euro-Atlantic community reach a new critical point. The article aims to follow the way in which this tension unfolds in the Serbian society. It starts with identifying the types of discourses related to the idea of „friendship/ brotherhood” between Serbia and Russia. The selection of discourses is composed of statements belonging to officials from Belgrade, the political parties and the civil society. Using the poststructuralist approach, this study starts from the idea that international relations and a state’s foreign policy are strongly connected with the meanings attached to concepts or ideas. Such meanings are not given by a certain objective historical evolution, but can be constructed or deconstructed by the political, intellectual, social elites within a community. The discourses, collected from the November 2013 – April 2016 period, will be analysed with the Foucauldian Discourse Analysis method. Firstly, we will see how the idea of friendship between Serbia and Russia is constructed or deconstructed by several selected elite groups (how the different discourses are organized) and secondly, if the particular types of discourses imply certain specific foreign policy positions, justified by the elites as being directly linked. Conclusions indicate that Russophilia is a powerful legitimization tool, even in a context where this approach creates missed opportunities. On the contrary, emotional arguments prevail and strictly rational foreign policy decisions can be easily antagonized as breaking the norms of good international behaviour.","PeriodicalId":40359,"journal":{"name":"Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(De-)Constructing Serbian Russophilia In The Context Of The Crisis In Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Eugenia-Maria Magurean\",\"doi\":\"10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the background of the Ukrainian crisis, the relations between Russia and the Euro-Atlantic community reach a new critical point. The article aims to follow the way in which this tension unfolds in the Serbian society. It starts with identifying the types of discourses related to the idea of „friendship/ brotherhood” between Serbia and Russia. The selection of discourses is composed of statements belonging to officials from Belgrade, the political parties and the civil society. Using the poststructuralist approach, this study starts from the idea that international relations and a state’s foreign policy are strongly connected with the meanings attached to concepts or ideas. Such meanings are not given by a certain objective historical evolution, but can be constructed or deconstructed by the political, intellectual, social elites within a community. The discourses, collected from the November 2013 – April 2016 period, will be analysed with the Foucauldian Discourse Analysis method. Firstly, we will see how the idea of friendship between Serbia and Russia is constructed or deconstructed by several selected elite groups (how the different discourses are organized) and secondly, if the particular types of discourses imply certain specific foreign policy positions, justified by the elites as being directly linked. Conclusions indicate that Russophilia is a powerful legitimization tool, even in a context where this approach creates missed opportunities. On the contrary, emotional arguments prevail and strictly rational foreign policy decisions can be easily antagonized as breaking the norms of good international behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在乌克兰危机的背景下,俄罗斯与欧洲-大西洋共同体的关系达到了一个新的临界点。本文旨在追踪这种紧张局势在塞尔维亚社会中展开的方式。本文首先确定塞尔维亚与俄罗斯之间的“友谊/兄弟情谊”相关的话语类型。所选的话语包括来自贝尔格莱德、各政党和民间社会的官员的发言。本研究采用后结构主义的方法,从国际关系和国家的外交政策与概念或思想所附加的意义密切相关的观点出发。这种意义不是由某种客观的历史演变所赋予的,而是可以由一个共同体内的政治、知识分子、社会精英所建构或解构的。从2013年11月至2016年4月期间收集的话语将使用福柯话语分析方法进行分析。首先,我们将看到塞尔维亚和俄罗斯之间的友谊概念是如何被几个选定的精英群体建构或解构的(不同的话语是如何组织的),其次,如果特定类型的话语暗示某些特定的外交政策立场,被精英证明是直接相关的。结论表明,亲俄主义是一种强大的合法化工具,即使在这种做法会导致错失机会的情况下也是如此。相反,情绪化的论点占上风,严格理性的外交政策决定很容易被视为违反了良好的国际行为准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(De-)Constructing Serbian Russophilia In The Context Of The Crisis In Ukraine
On the background of the Ukrainian crisis, the relations between Russia and the Euro-Atlantic community reach a new critical point. The article aims to follow the way in which this tension unfolds in the Serbian society. It starts with identifying the types of discourses related to the idea of „friendship/ brotherhood” between Serbia and Russia. The selection of discourses is composed of statements belonging to officials from Belgrade, the political parties and the civil society. Using the poststructuralist approach, this study starts from the idea that international relations and a state’s foreign policy are strongly connected with the meanings attached to concepts or ideas. Such meanings are not given by a certain objective historical evolution, but can be constructed or deconstructed by the political, intellectual, social elites within a community. The discourses, collected from the November 2013 – April 2016 period, will be analysed with the Foucauldian Discourse Analysis method. Firstly, we will see how the idea of friendship between Serbia and Russia is constructed or deconstructed by several selected elite groups (how the different discourses are organized) and secondly, if the particular types of discourses imply certain specific foreign policy positions, justified by the elites as being directly linked. Conclusions indicate that Russophilia is a powerful legitimization tool, even in a context where this approach creates missed opportunities. On the contrary, emotional arguments prevail and strictly rational foreign policy decisions can be easily antagonized as breaking the norms of good international behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
BOOK REVIEW Manuel DeLanda, 2016, Assemblage Theory, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press. ISBN Paperback 9781474413633 THE ROLE OF THE EURO IN STRENGHTENING THE EUROPEAN IDENTITY MIGRATION BETWEEN LATIN AMERICA AND THE UNITED STATES IN 2015-2018. DIFFERENCES IN IMMIGRATION POLICIES BETWEEN THE OBAMA AND TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONS THE EUROPEAN UNION’S APPROACH TOWARDS THE ENTRY OF THIRD-COUNTRY NATIONALS INTO ITS TERRITORY DEMOCRATIC BACKSLIDING: LESSONS TO BE LEARNED FROM POLAND
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1