高性能战斗机飞行员医疗选拔的层次分析法研究

Cong Wang, Qi Zhang, Hua Ge, Q. Yao, Yang Minghao, Xian-liang Zhao, Yuanjing Zheng, Guowei Shi, Yuexin Ma
{"title":"高性能战斗机飞行员医疗选拔的层次分析法研究","authors":"Cong Wang, Qi Zhang, Hua Ge, Q. Yao, Yang Minghao, Xian-liang Zhao, Yuanjing Zheng, Guowei Shi, Yuexin Ma","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-6239.2018.03-04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo build an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of the medical selection for the high performance fighter pilot. \n \n \nMethods \nAccording to the consulting results from aeromedical experts, an AHP model and expert′s judgment matrix were built and checked upon the consistency. Then, the relative weights of evaluation indexes were calculated. The method was preliminarily applied in the medical selection of high performance fighter pilot. \n \n \nResults \nAn AHP evaluation model of medical selection for high performance fighter pilot was constructed, including 5 first level indexes of basic physiological function, flight physiological endurance, psychological basis, mental ability, physical fitness and ergonomics, and 23 second level indexes. The relative weights of 5 first level indexes were 0.172 8, 0.224 1, 0.178 5, 0.289 1 and 0.135 5 corresponding to basic physiological function, flight physiological endurance, psychological basis, mental ability, physical fitness and ergonomics. The model was applied to comprehensively evaluate the physiological and psychological indexes of 16 hight performance fighter pilot candidates. The scores in turn from high to low were 7.79, 7.45, 7.24, 7.17, 7.15, 6.92, 6.81, 6.59, 6.24, 6.02, 5.96, 5.85, 5.83, 5.71, 5.26 and 5.20. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe AHP provides new method and reference to high performance fighter pilot selection and the application accumulates data and experience for other objective evaluation researches. \n \n \nKey words: \nPersonnel selection; Methods; Comprehensive evaluation; Analytic hierarchy process model; Pilots","PeriodicalId":9904,"journal":{"name":"中华航空航天医学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the analytic hierarchy process of the medical selection for high performance fighter pilot\",\"authors\":\"Cong Wang, Qi Zhang, Hua Ge, Q. Yao, Yang Minghao, Xian-liang Zhao, Yuanjing Zheng, Guowei Shi, Yuexin Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-6239.2018.03-04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo build an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of the medical selection for the high performance fighter pilot. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nAccording to the consulting results from aeromedical experts, an AHP model and expert′s judgment matrix were built and checked upon the consistency. Then, the relative weights of evaluation indexes were calculated. The method was preliminarily applied in the medical selection of high performance fighter pilot. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAn AHP evaluation model of medical selection for high performance fighter pilot was constructed, including 5 first level indexes of basic physiological function, flight physiological endurance, psychological basis, mental ability, physical fitness and ergonomics, and 23 second level indexes. The relative weights of 5 first level indexes were 0.172 8, 0.224 1, 0.178 5, 0.289 1 and 0.135 5 corresponding to basic physiological function, flight physiological endurance, psychological basis, mental ability, physical fitness and ergonomics. The model was applied to comprehensively evaluate the physiological and psychological indexes of 16 hight performance fighter pilot candidates. The scores in turn from high to low were 7.79, 7.45, 7.24, 7.17, 7.15, 6.92, 6.81, 6.59, 6.24, 6.02, 5.96, 5.85, 5.83, 5.71, 5.26 and 5.20. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe AHP provides new method and reference to high performance fighter pilot selection and the application accumulates data and experience for other objective evaluation researches. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nPersonnel selection; Methods; Comprehensive evaluation; Analytic hierarchy process model; Pilots\",\"PeriodicalId\":9904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华航空航天医学杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华航空航天医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-6239.2018.03-04.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华航空航天医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-6239.2018.03-04.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的建立高性能战斗机飞行员医疗选择的层次分析法(AHP)。方法根据航空医学专家的咨询结果,建立层次分析法模型和专家判断矩阵,并进行一致性检验。然后,计算各评价指标的相对权重。该方法已初步应用于高性能战斗机飞行员的医学选拔。结果构建了高性能战斗机飞行员医疗选择的AHP评价模型,包括基本生理功能、飞行生理耐力、心理基础、心理能力、体质和工效学5个一级指标和23个二级指标。基本生理机能、飞行生理耐力、心理基础、心理能力、体质和工效学5个一级指标的相对权重分别为0.172 8、0.224 1、0.178 5、0.289 1和0.135 5。应用该模型对16名高性能战斗机飞行员候选人的生理、心理指标进行了综合评价。得分由高到低依次为7.79、7.45、7.24、7.17、7.15、6.92、6.81、6.59、6.24、6.02、5.96、5.85、5.83、5.71、5.26、5.20。结论层次分析法为高性能战斗机飞行员选拔提供了新的方法和参考,其应用为其他客观评价研究积累了数据和经验。关键词:人才选拔;方法;综合评价;层次分析法;飞行员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study on the analytic hierarchy process of the medical selection for high performance fighter pilot
Objective To build an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of the medical selection for the high performance fighter pilot. Methods According to the consulting results from aeromedical experts, an AHP model and expert′s judgment matrix were built and checked upon the consistency. Then, the relative weights of evaluation indexes were calculated. The method was preliminarily applied in the medical selection of high performance fighter pilot. Results An AHP evaluation model of medical selection for high performance fighter pilot was constructed, including 5 first level indexes of basic physiological function, flight physiological endurance, psychological basis, mental ability, physical fitness and ergonomics, and 23 second level indexes. The relative weights of 5 first level indexes were 0.172 8, 0.224 1, 0.178 5, 0.289 1 and 0.135 5 corresponding to basic physiological function, flight physiological endurance, psychological basis, mental ability, physical fitness and ergonomics. The model was applied to comprehensively evaluate the physiological and psychological indexes of 16 hight performance fighter pilot candidates. The scores in turn from high to low were 7.79, 7.45, 7.24, 7.17, 7.15, 6.92, 6.81, 6.59, 6.24, 6.02, 5.96, 5.85, 5.83, 5.71, 5.26 and 5.20. Conclusions The AHP provides new method and reference to high performance fighter pilot selection and the application accumulates data and experience for other objective evaluation researches. Key words: Personnel selection; Methods; Comprehensive evaluation; Analytic hierarchy process model; Pilots
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2962
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
A civil pilot case of palindromic rheumatism A pilot case of Sjögren's syndrome Clinical treatment and medical evaluation of the civil airline pilots with otosclerosis Detection and reference value of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential in military pilots Effects of 72 h-isolation and confinement with sleep deprivation on astronaut's attention on network functions and operation performance of manual controlled simulated rendezvous and docking task
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1