女大学生的COVID-19大流行压力和复原力:一项面对面与在线入学的多组比较研究

IF 2.2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Educational and Developmental Psychologist Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1080/20590776.2023.2187695
T. L. Chu, Betty A. Rose-Ackley
{"title":"女大学生的COVID-19大流行压力和复原力:一项面对面与在线入学的多组比较研究","authors":"T. L. Chu, Betty A. Rose-Ackley","doi":"10.1080/20590776.2023.2187695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective College students, especially females, reported worsened mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. This multigroup comparative study aimed to explore stress and resilience of female college students between in-person and online enrolments, as well as with and without mental health diagnoses, at early and later stages of the pandemic. Method Participants were 32 female undergraduate students (Mage = 23.75, SD = 6.13) from three classes – Spring 2020 in-person, Spring 2020 exclusively online, and Spring 2021 exclusively online enrolments – in a midwestern regional university in the U.S. They completed two surveys, four weeks apart between Times 1 and 2, quantitatively and qualitatively assessing perceived stressors, stress levels, and resilience. Frequency analyses, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted by class. Results Overall, the most reported stressors in Time 1/Time2 were school (25.83%/26.36%), family (16.67%/18.33%), and lifestyle (16.67%/15.00%). On average, students with mental health diagnoses perceived more stressors, especially at the onset of the pandemic, than those without. Findings were presented and interpreted using cross-case analysis, suggesting that the pandemic stress and resilience depended upon students’ enrolment format and associated stressors. Conclusions This study offered practical implications for addressing student stressors during a crisis, across in-person and online enrolments, through targeted interventions. Key Points What is already known about this topic: College students increasingly reported elevated stress and mental health issues during the pandemic, negatively impacting females more than males. The transition from in-person to online education at the onset of the pandemic added stress to students’ lives. People with mental health diagnoses tend to have negative appraisals and lower levels of resilience to regulate stress than those without diagnoses. What this paper adds: This study implemented a case study approach to take a deeper look at female college students’ pandemic stressors and resilience to inform personalized interventions. Female students who enrolled exclusively online before the pandemic reported fewer school stressors but more family stressors during the pandemic than those who enrolled in person. Findings across all three classes suggest that the female students with mental health diagnoses perceived more stressors and higher stress levels than those without diagnoses across pandemic stages.","PeriodicalId":44410,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","volume":"26 1","pages":"244 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 pandemic stress and resilience in female college students: a multigroup comparative study of in-person versus online enrolments\",\"authors\":\"T. L. Chu, Betty A. Rose-Ackley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20590776.2023.2187695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective College students, especially females, reported worsened mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. This multigroup comparative study aimed to explore stress and resilience of female college students between in-person and online enrolments, as well as with and without mental health diagnoses, at early and later stages of the pandemic. Method Participants were 32 female undergraduate students (Mage = 23.75, SD = 6.13) from three classes – Spring 2020 in-person, Spring 2020 exclusively online, and Spring 2021 exclusively online enrolments – in a midwestern regional university in the U.S. They completed two surveys, four weeks apart between Times 1 and 2, quantitatively and qualitatively assessing perceived stressors, stress levels, and resilience. Frequency analyses, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted by class. Results Overall, the most reported stressors in Time 1/Time2 were school (25.83%/26.36%), family (16.67%/18.33%), and lifestyle (16.67%/15.00%). On average, students with mental health diagnoses perceived more stressors, especially at the onset of the pandemic, than those without. Findings were presented and interpreted using cross-case analysis, suggesting that the pandemic stress and resilience depended upon students’ enrolment format and associated stressors. Conclusions This study offered practical implications for addressing student stressors during a crisis, across in-person and online enrolments, through targeted interventions. Key Points What is already known about this topic: College students increasingly reported elevated stress and mental health issues during the pandemic, negatively impacting females more than males. The transition from in-person to online education at the onset of the pandemic added stress to students’ lives. People with mental health diagnoses tend to have negative appraisals and lower levels of resilience to regulate stress than those without diagnoses. What this paper adds: This study implemented a case study approach to take a deeper look at female college students’ pandemic stressors and resilience to inform personalized interventions. Female students who enrolled exclusively online before the pandemic reported fewer school stressors but more family stressors during the pandemic than those who enrolled in person. Findings across all three classes suggest that the female students with mental health diagnoses perceived more stressors and higher stress levels than those without diagnoses across pandemic stages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational and Developmental Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"244 - 254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational and Developmental Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2023.2187695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2023.2187695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

【摘要】目的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行期间,大学生(尤其是女生)心理健康状况恶化。这项多组比较研究旨在探讨在大流行的早期和后期阶段,面对面和在线入学,以及有和没有心理健康诊断的女大学生的压力和恢复能力。方法参与者为32名女本科生(Mage = 23.75, SD = 6.13),来自美国中西部地区一所大学的三个班级——2020年春季面对面、2020年春季纯在线和2021年春季纯在线招生——他们完成了两次调查,间隔时间为第1次和第2次,间隔四周,定量和定性地评估感知压力源、压力水平和恢复力。频率分析、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Mann-Whitney U检验按班级进行。结果总体而言,时间1/时间2中报告压力源最多的是学校(25.83%/26.36%)、家庭(16.67%/18.33%)和生活方式(16.67%/15.00%)。平均而言,有心理健康诊断的学生感受到的压力源更多,尤其是在大流行开始时。使用交叉案例分析提出并解释了调查结果,表明大流行的压力和复原力取决于学生的入学形式和相关的压力源。本研究通过有针对性的干预措施,为解决学生在危机期间的压力源提供了实际意义,包括面对面和在线入学。关于这一主题的已知情况:在大流行期间,越来越多的大学生报告压力和心理健康问题加剧,对女性的负面影响大于男性。大流行开始时,从面对面教育向在线教育的转变给学生的生活增加了压力。有心理健康诊断的人往往有负面评价,调节压力的弹性水平比没有诊断的人低。本文补充的内容:本研究采用案例研究方法,深入研究女大学生的流行病压力源和复原力,为个性化干预提供信息。在大流行之前只在网上注册的女学生报告说,在大流行期间,学校压力源较少,但家庭压力源较多。所有三个班级的研究结果表明,在大流行阶段,被诊断为精神健康的女学生比没有被诊断为精神健康的女学生感受到更多的压力源和更高的压力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 pandemic stress and resilience in female college students: a multigroup comparative study of in-person versus online enrolments
ABSTRACT Objective College students, especially females, reported worsened mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. This multigroup comparative study aimed to explore stress and resilience of female college students between in-person and online enrolments, as well as with and without mental health diagnoses, at early and later stages of the pandemic. Method Participants were 32 female undergraduate students (Mage = 23.75, SD = 6.13) from three classes – Spring 2020 in-person, Spring 2020 exclusively online, and Spring 2021 exclusively online enrolments – in a midwestern regional university in the U.S. They completed two surveys, four weeks apart between Times 1 and 2, quantitatively and qualitatively assessing perceived stressors, stress levels, and resilience. Frequency analyses, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted by class. Results Overall, the most reported stressors in Time 1/Time2 were school (25.83%/26.36%), family (16.67%/18.33%), and lifestyle (16.67%/15.00%). On average, students with mental health diagnoses perceived more stressors, especially at the onset of the pandemic, than those without. Findings were presented and interpreted using cross-case analysis, suggesting that the pandemic stress and resilience depended upon students’ enrolment format and associated stressors. Conclusions This study offered practical implications for addressing student stressors during a crisis, across in-person and online enrolments, through targeted interventions. Key Points What is already known about this topic: College students increasingly reported elevated stress and mental health issues during the pandemic, negatively impacting females more than males. The transition from in-person to online education at the onset of the pandemic added stress to students’ lives. People with mental health diagnoses tend to have negative appraisals and lower levels of resilience to regulate stress than those without diagnoses. What this paper adds: This study implemented a case study approach to take a deeper look at female college students’ pandemic stressors and resilience to inform personalized interventions. Female students who enrolled exclusively online before the pandemic reported fewer school stressors but more family stressors during the pandemic than those who enrolled in person. Findings across all three classes suggest that the female students with mental health diagnoses perceived more stressors and higher stress levels than those without diagnoses across pandemic stages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational and Developmental Psychologist
Educational and Developmental Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Published biannually, this quality, peer-reviewed journal publishes psychological research that makes a substantial contribution to the knowledge and practice of education and developmental psychology. The broad aims are to provide a vehicle for dissemination of research that is of national and international significance to the researchers, practitioners and students of educational and developmental psychology.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Bullying and Cyberbullying Scale for Adolescents (BCS-A) in Iranian students Applying computer vision techniques to depression symptomatology through eye blink patterns in university students Rest breaks aid directed attention and learning Self-reported homesickness in Australian adolescent males during their first year at boarding school: an exploratory study of symptomatic features, its dimensionality, coping strategies, and the relationship with academic, resilience, emotional and mental wellbeing factors Cognitive flexibility and academic performance of children in care and children from a community sample: the contrasting mediator effect of task persistence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1