{"title":"面向对象设计度量的概述","authors":"R. Harrison, S. Counsell, R. Nithi","doi":"10.1109/STEP.1997.615494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we examine the current state in the field of object-oriented design metrices. We describe three sets of currently available metrics suites, namely, those of Chidamber and Kemerer (1993), Lorenze and Kidd (1994) and Abreu (1995). We consider the important features of each set, and assess the appropriateness and usefulness of each in evaluating the design of object-oriented systems. As a result, we identify problems common to all three sets of metrices, allowing us to suggest possible improvements in this area.","PeriodicalId":68622,"journal":{"name":"软件","volume":"25 1","pages":"230-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"97","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An overview of object-oriented design metrics\",\"authors\":\"R. Harrison, S. Counsell, R. Nithi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STEP.1997.615494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we examine the current state in the field of object-oriented design metrices. We describe three sets of currently available metrics suites, namely, those of Chidamber and Kemerer (1993), Lorenze and Kidd (1994) and Abreu (1995). We consider the important features of each set, and assess the appropriateness and usefulness of each in evaluating the design of object-oriented systems. As a result, we identify problems common to all three sets of metrices, allowing us to suggest possible improvements in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"软件\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"230-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"97\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"软件\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.1997.615494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"软件","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.1997.615494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper, we examine the current state in the field of object-oriented design metrices. We describe three sets of currently available metrics suites, namely, those of Chidamber and Kemerer (1993), Lorenze and Kidd (1994) and Abreu (1995). We consider the important features of each set, and assess the appropriateness and usefulness of each in evaluating the design of object-oriented systems. As a result, we identify problems common to all three sets of metrices, allowing us to suggest possible improvements in this area.
期刊介绍：
Computer engineering & Software, founded in 1979, is an academic journal of information technology sponsored by China Association for Science and Technology and China Institute of Electronics and Tianjin Institute of Electronics.
Computer engineering & Software has columns such as expert Forum, Fund project papers, software and database technology research, application technology and research, network and communication, image processing and application, multimedia technology application Artificial intelligence and recognition.
Computer engineering & Software is the source Journal of China Academic Periodical Comprehensive Evaluation Database, the Journal of China Core Periodical (Selection) Database, the source journal of Peking University's Chinese Core Periodical Overview (the first edition in 1992), the Journal of Wanfang data-Digital Periodical Group full-text Collection, the Journal of Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (full-text edition), and Wave Journals included in the "Copernicus Index" have been included in the United States "Cambridge Scientific Abstracts", the United States "Uhlig International Journal Guide", the JST Japan Science and Technology Promotion Agency database (2018) and other Chinese and foreign databases.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
