印尼仓单制度监管:对小农有利吗?

Q3 Social Sciences Sriwijaya Law Review Pub Date : 2019-07-31 DOI:10.28946/SLREV.VOL3.ISS2.292.PP162-175
Khoirul Hidayah, Iffaty Nasyi’ah, Jundiani Jundiani
{"title":"印尼仓单制度监管:对小农有利吗?","authors":"Khoirul Hidayah, Iffaty Nasyi’ah, Jundiani Jundiani","doi":"10.28946/SLREV.VOL3.ISS2.292.PP162-175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The regulation of Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) in Indonesia written in The Law No. 9 of 2011 concerning Amendment of WRS is expected to be useful and to facilitate farmers of WRS. However, in its practice, WRS in Indonesia was not yet able to improve the credit amount of banking with warehouse receipt as a guarantee. Malang Regency is one of the potential areas of farming products in East Java and once built WRS in 2012, so it is interesting to make this area as a research object in terms of reviewing WRS regulation in Indonesia. The issue is whether the purpose of establishing the law on WRS gave advantage and credit expediency, particularly for small farmers. This article is empirical legal research with a socio-juridical approach by describing the implementation of farm credit through WRS, describing the farmers’ utilization of WRS in Malang Regency, then, analyzing it using regulation of warehouse receipt in Indonesia and the theory of legal effectiveness. Overall evaluation of WRS in the mentioned area shows that some parties, such as farmers, unit cooperation village, and local government, are at a loss. The evaluation result of WRS regulation implementation cannot realize the goals of the law on WRS; those are giving easy, affordable, and fast access to farmers in getting capital. The WRS cannot give advantage for small farmers. The policy of WRS in Indonesia has not yet been able to help farmers to challenge the competition in the free-trading market through ASEAN Economic Community. The researchers suggest that the WRS regulation must be made and integrated with farmer’s policy so it can give advantage for small farmers.","PeriodicalId":32073,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya Law Review","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Warehouse Receipt System Regulation in Indonesia: Is It Beneficial for Small Farmer?\",\"authors\":\"Khoirul Hidayah, Iffaty Nasyi’ah, Jundiani Jundiani\",\"doi\":\"10.28946/SLREV.VOL3.ISS2.292.PP162-175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The regulation of Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) in Indonesia written in The Law No. 9 of 2011 concerning Amendment of WRS is expected to be useful and to facilitate farmers of WRS. However, in its practice, WRS in Indonesia was not yet able to improve the credit amount of banking with warehouse receipt as a guarantee. Malang Regency is one of the potential areas of farming products in East Java and once built WRS in 2012, so it is interesting to make this area as a research object in terms of reviewing WRS regulation in Indonesia. The issue is whether the purpose of establishing the law on WRS gave advantage and credit expediency, particularly for small farmers. This article is empirical legal research with a socio-juridical approach by describing the implementation of farm credit through WRS, describing the farmers’ utilization of WRS in Malang Regency, then, analyzing it using regulation of warehouse receipt in Indonesia and the theory of legal effectiveness. Overall evaluation of WRS in the mentioned area shows that some parties, such as farmers, unit cooperation village, and local government, are at a loss. The evaluation result of WRS regulation implementation cannot realize the goals of the law on WRS; those are giving easy, affordable, and fast access to farmers in getting capital. The WRS cannot give advantage for small farmers. The policy of WRS in Indonesia has not yet been able to help farmers to challenge the competition in the free-trading market through ASEAN Economic Community. The researchers suggest that the WRS regulation must be made and integrated with farmer’s policy so it can give advantage for small farmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sriwijaya Law Review\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sriwijaya Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28946/SLREV.VOL3.ISS2.292.PP162-175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28946/SLREV.VOL3.ISS2.292.PP162-175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

2011年第9号法律中关于仓储收据制度(WRS)修正案的规定预计将对印度尼西亚的仓储收据制度(WRS)有所帮助,并为WRS的农民提供便利。然而,在印尼的WRS实践中,目前还无法完善以仓单为担保的银行信贷额度。玛琅摄政是东爪哇的农产品发展潜力地区之一,并于2012年建立了WRS,因此在审查印度尼西亚WRS法规方面,将该地区作为研究对象是很有趣的。问题在于,制定有关WRS的法律的目的是否提供了优势和信贷便利,特别是对小农而言。本文采用社会法学方法进行实证法律研究,首先描述了通过WRS实施农业信贷的情况,然后描述了马郎县农民对WRS的利用情况,然后利用印度尼西亚的仓单监管和法律效力理论对其进行了分析。对该地区WRS的总体评价显示,农户、单位合作村、地方政府等部分主体处于不知所措的状态。WRS法规实施的评价结果不能实现WRS法的目标;这些为农民提供了简单、负担得起和快速的融资渠道。WRS不能给小农带来好处。印尼的WRS政策尚未能够帮助农民通过东盟经济共同体挑战自由贸易市场的竞争。研究人员建议,必须制定WRS法规,并将其与农民政策相结合,以便为小农提供优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Warehouse Receipt System Regulation in Indonesia: Is It Beneficial for Small Farmer?
The regulation of Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) in Indonesia written in The Law No. 9 of 2011 concerning Amendment of WRS is expected to be useful and to facilitate farmers of WRS. However, in its practice, WRS in Indonesia was not yet able to improve the credit amount of banking with warehouse receipt as a guarantee. Malang Regency is one of the potential areas of farming products in East Java and once built WRS in 2012, so it is interesting to make this area as a research object in terms of reviewing WRS regulation in Indonesia. The issue is whether the purpose of establishing the law on WRS gave advantage and credit expediency, particularly for small farmers. This article is empirical legal research with a socio-juridical approach by describing the implementation of farm credit through WRS, describing the farmers’ utilization of WRS in Malang Regency, then, analyzing it using regulation of warehouse receipt in Indonesia and the theory of legal effectiveness. Overall evaluation of WRS in the mentioned area shows that some parties, such as farmers, unit cooperation village, and local government, are at a loss. The evaluation result of WRS regulation implementation cannot realize the goals of the law on WRS; those are giving easy, affordable, and fast access to farmers in getting capital. The WRS cannot give advantage for small farmers. The policy of WRS in Indonesia has not yet been able to help farmers to challenge the competition in the free-trading market through ASEAN Economic Community. The researchers suggest that the WRS regulation must be made and integrated with farmer’s policy so it can give advantage for small farmers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sriwijaya Law Review
Sriwijaya Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can the Right to A Good and Healthy Environment be Claimed as a Human Right? Judaization in Palestine: Is It Genocide According to the 1998 Rome Statute? Criminal Legal Protection for Bona Fide Third Parties Over Assets in Corruption and Money Laundering Cases Mapping and Harmonizing Qanun on Sharia Financial Institutions Problematics of Inter-Regional Cooperation in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1