民族主义和国际主义和解

Antero Holmila, P. Ihalainen
{"title":"民族主义和国际主义和解","authors":"Antero Holmila, P. Ihalainen","doi":"10.3167/choc.2018.130202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The carnage of World War I gave rise to liberal visions for a new world\norder with democratized foreign policy and informed international public\nopinion. Conservatives emphasized continuity in national sovereignty,\nwhile socialists focused on the interests of the working class. While British\ndiplomacy in the construction of the League of Nations has been widely\ndiscussed, we focus on contemporary uses of nationalism and internationalism\nin parliamentary and press debates that are more ideological. We also\nexamine how failed internationalist visions influenced uses of these concepts\nduring World War II, supporting alternative organizational solutions,\ncaution with the rhetoric of democracy and public opinion, and ways to\nreconcile national sovereignty with a new world organization. The United\nNations was to guarantee the interests of the leading powers (including the\nUnited States), while associations with breakthroughs of democracy were\navoided. Nationalism (patriotism) and internationalism were reconciled\nwith less idealism and more pragmatism.","PeriodicalId":42746,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationalism and Internationalism Reconciled\",\"authors\":\"Antero Holmila, P. Ihalainen\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/choc.2018.130202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The carnage of World War I gave rise to liberal visions for a new world\\norder with democratized foreign policy and informed international public\\nopinion. Conservatives emphasized continuity in national sovereignty,\\nwhile socialists focused on the interests of the working class. While British\\ndiplomacy in the construction of the League of Nations has been widely\\ndiscussed, we focus on contemporary uses of nationalism and internationalism\\nin parliamentary and press debates that are more ideological. We also\\nexamine how failed internationalist visions influenced uses of these concepts\\nduring World War II, supporting alternative organizational solutions,\\ncaution with the rhetoric of democracy and public opinion, and ways to\\nreconcile national sovereignty with a new world organization. The United\\nNations was to guarantee the interests of the leading powers (including the\\nUnited States), while associations with breakthroughs of democracy were\\navoided. Nationalism (patriotism) and internationalism were reconciled\\nwith less idealism and more pragmatism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2018.130202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2018.130202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一次世界大战的大屠杀催生了自由主义者对新世界秩序的愿景,即外交政策民主化,国际舆论知情。保守派强调国家主权的连续性,而社会主义者则关注工人阶级的利益。虽然英国在国际联盟建设中的外交已经被广泛讨论,但我们关注的是民族主义和国际主义在议会和媒体辩论中的当代应用,这些辩论更具意识形态性。我们还研究了失败的国际主义愿景如何影响二战期间这些概念的使用,支持其他组织解决方案,谨慎对待民主和公众舆论的修辞,以及调和国家主权与新的世界组织的方法。联合国是为了保障主要大国(包括美国)的利益,而与民主突破的联系则被避免。民族主义(爱国主义)和国际主义与较少的理想主义和较多的实用主义相调和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nationalism and Internationalism Reconciled
The carnage of World War I gave rise to liberal visions for a new world order with democratized foreign policy and informed international public opinion. Conservatives emphasized continuity in national sovereignty, while socialists focused on the interests of the working class. While British diplomacy in the construction of the League of Nations has been widely discussed, we focus on contemporary uses of nationalism and internationalism in parliamentary and press debates that are more ideological. We also examine how failed internationalist visions influenced uses of these concepts during World War II, supporting alternative organizational solutions, caution with the rhetoric of democracy and public opinion, and ways to reconcile national sovereignty with a new world organization. The United Nations was to guarantee the interests of the leading powers (including the United States), while associations with breakthroughs of democracy were avoided. Nationalism (patriotism) and internationalism were reconciled with less idealism and more pragmatism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Contributions to the History of Concepts is no longer published by Brill from 2010.
期刊最新文献
Desencanto in the Spanish Transition (1977–1982) From Empires of Nations to the Nation-State of Minorities Generation Marx The Mainstreaming of Global Inequality, 1980–2020 Early Modern Terminology for Dialect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1