相信失败是必要的:失败是促进的心态调解完美主义和学术投入的关系

IF 2.2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Educational and Developmental Psychologist Pub Date : 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1080/20590776.2023.2210760
Renz Louis T. Montano
{"title":"相信失败是必要的:失败是促进的心态调解完美主义和学术投入的关系","authors":"Renz Louis T. Montano","doi":"10.1080/20590776.2023.2210760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective The present study aimed to (1) to determine how the two dimensions of perfectionism – perfectionistic strivings (PS) and evaluative concerns (EC) are associated with academic engagement and (2) to determine if failure mindset mediates the relationship between perfectionism and academic engagement. Method Four hundred and forty-eight Filipino undergraduate students with an average age of 20.91 SD = 2.37participated in the survey. Results The results indicate that PS is positively linked to academic engagement through failure-is-enhancing beliefs. In contrast, EC is associated with lower academic engagement through a reduced failure-is-enhancing mindset. Conclusion This study provides evidence that believing that failure is essential rather than unhelpful is an important factor in predicting academic engagement among perfectionists. Specifically, it was found that having high PS promotes the belief that failures are important in learning, while the opposite pattern was observed among those high in EC. This supports the view that perfectionism has an adaptive and a maladaptive side. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Perfectionistic strivings domain is linked to higher engagement in the educational context, while the evaluation concerns is associated with task aversion, avoidance, and procrastination, which are indicative of disengagement. Individuals high in perfectionistic strivings usually display higher aspirations and hopes of success, while people high in evaluative concerns exhibit fear of failure and negative evaluation (Stoeber & Rambow, 2007; Stoeber et al., 2008). Fear of failure is associated with self-handicapping, helpless attribution and disengagement (Caraway et al., 2003; De Castella et al., 2013). What this topic adds: Individuals who are high in perfectionistic strivings are more likely to adopt the failure-is-enhancing mindset, while those high in evaluative concerns are less likely to endorse this belief. Perfectionistic strivings perfectionism is linked to higher academic engagement via failure-is-enhancing beliefs. In contrast, evaluation concern perfectionism is correlated with disengagement through a reduced failure-is-enhancing mindset. The present study offers initial evidence that perfectionists differ in the assumptions they hold about the meaning of failure.","PeriodicalId":44410,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Believing that failure is essential: failure-is-enhancing mindset mediates the relationship of perfectionism and academic engagement\",\"authors\":\"Renz Louis T. Montano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20590776.2023.2210760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective The present study aimed to (1) to determine how the two dimensions of perfectionism – perfectionistic strivings (PS) and evaluative concerns (EC) are associated with academic engagement and (2) to determine if failure mindset mediates the relationship between perfectionism and academic engagement. Method Four hundred and forty-eight Filipino undergraduate students with an average age of 20.91 SD = 2.37participated in the survey. Results The results indicate that PS is positively linked to academic engagement through failure-is-enhancing beliefs. In contrast, EC is associated with lower academic engagement through a reduced failure-is-enhancing mindset. Conclusion This study provides evidence that believing that failure is essential rather than unhelpful is an important factor in predicting academic engagement among perfectionists. Specifically, it was found that having high PS promotes the belief that failures are important in learning, while the opposite pattern was observed among those high in EC. This supports the view that perfectionism has an adaptive and a maladaptive side. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Perfectionistic strivings domain is linked to higher engagement in the educational context, while the evaluation concerns is associated with task aversion, avoidance, and procrastination, which are indicative of disengagement. Individuals high in perfectionistic strivings usually display higher aspirations and hopes of success, while people high in evaluative concerns exhibit fear of failure and negative evaluation (Stoeber & Rambow, 2007; Stoeber et al., 2008). Fear of failure is associated with self-handicapping, helpless attribution and disengagement (Caraway et al., 2003; De Castella et al., 2013). What this topic adds: Individuals who are high in perfectionistic strivings are more likely to adopt the failure-is-enhancing mindset, while those high in evaluative concerns are less likely to endorse this belief. Perfectionistic strivings perfectionism is linked to higher academic engagement via failure-is-enhancing beliefs. In contrast, evaluation concern perfectionism is correlated with disengagement through a reduced failure-is-enhancing mindset. The present study offers initial evidence that perfectionists differ in the assumptions they hold about the meaning of failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational and Developmental Psychologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational and Developmental Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2023.2210760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2023.2210760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要目的本研究旨在(1)确定完美主义的两个维度——完美主义努力(PS)和评价关注(EC)与学业投入之间的关系;(2)确定失败心态是否在完美主义与学业投入之间起到中介作用。方法对448名菲律宾籍大学生进行调查,平均年龄为20.91 SD = 2.37。结果结果表明,PS通过“失败是增强信念”与学业投入呈正相关。相比之下,EC与较低的学术投入有关,因为失败是一种减少的心态。本研究提供的证据表明,相信失败是必要的,而不是无益的,是预测完美主义者学业投入的重要因素。具体来说,研究发现,高PS促进了失败在学习中很重要的信念,而在高EC中观察到相反的模式。这支持了完美主义有适应和不适应两方面的观点。关于这个话题我们已经知道的是:完美主义的努力领域与教育环境中更高的投入有关,而评估关注与任务厌恶、回避和拖延有关,这表明了脱离投入。追求完美的人通常表现出更高的抱负和对成功的希望,而高度关注评价的人则表现出对失败和负面评价的恐惧(Stoeber & Rambow, 2007;Stoeber et al., 2008)。对失败的恐惧与自我设限、无助归因和脱离接触有关(Caraway等,2003;De Castella et al., 2013)。本主题补充:追求完美的人更有可能采用失败是一种进步的心态,而那些高度关注评估的人则不太可能赞同这种信念。完美主义的努力完美主义与更高的学术投入有关,因为他们相信失败是有益的。相比之下,评估关注完美主义通过减少“失败是促进”的心态与脱离投入相关。目前的研究提供了初步证据,证明完美主义者对失败的意义持有不同的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Believing that failure is essential: failure-is-enhancing mindset mediates the relationship of perfectionism and academic engagement
ABSTRACT Objective The present study aimed to (1) to determine how the two dimensions of perfectionism – perfectionistic strivings (PS) and evaluative concerns (EC) are associated with academic engagement and (2) to determine if failure mindset mediates the relationship between perfectionism and academic engagement. Method Four hundred and forty-eight Filipino undergraduate students with an average age of 20.91 SD = 2.37participated in the survey. Results The results indicate that PS is positively linked to academic engagement through failure-is-enhancing beliefs. In contrast, EC is associated with lower academic engagement through a reduced failure-is-enhancing mindset. Conclusion This study provides evidence that believing that failure is essential rather than unhelpful is an important factor in predicting academic engagement among perfectionists. Specifically, it was found that having high PS promotes the belief that failures are important in learning, while the opposite pattern was observed among those high in EC. This supports the view that perfectionism has an adaptive and a maladaptive side. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Perfectionistic strivings domain is linked to higher engagement in the educational context, while the evaluation concerns is associated with task aversion, avoidance, and procrastination, which are indicative of disengagement. Individuals high in perfectionistic strivings usually display higher aspirations and hopes of success, while people high in evaluative concerns exhibit fear of failure and negative evaluation (Stoeber & Rambow, 2007; Stoeber et al., 2008). Fear of failure is associated with self-handicapping, helpless attribution and disengagement (Caraway et al., 2003; De Castella et al., 2013). What this topic adds: Individuals who are high in perfectionistic strivings are more likely to adopt the failure-is-enhancing mindset, while those high in evaluative concerns are less likely to endorse this belief. Perfectionistic strivings perfectionism is linked to higher academic engagement via failure-is-enhancing beliefs. In contrast, evaluation concern perfectionism is correlated with disengagement through a reduced failure-is-enhancing mindset. The present study offers initial evidence that perfectionists differ in the assumptions they hold about the meaning of failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational and Developmental Psychologist
Educational and Developmental Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Published biannually, this quality, peer-reviewed journal publishes psychological research that makes a substantial contribution to the knowledge and practice of education and developmental psychology. The broad aims are to provide a vehicle for dissemination of research that is of national and international significance to the researchers, practitioners and students of educational and developmental psychology.
期刊最新文献
Best practice in psychoeducational assessment: beyond the manual Parental involvement in school and quality of life: a longitudinal study with Portuguese parents during the COVID-19 pandemic period Parental experience and distress: the protective role of self-care and employment flexibility on parenting practices in parents of adolescents An adaptation of the KidCOPE: the KidCOPE-parent (KidCOPE-P) – a parent-report measure of child coping strategies Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Bullying and Cyberbullying Scale for Adolescents (BCS-A) in Iranian students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1