{"title":"语境中的知识:活动原则及其认识论结果","authors":"S. Leardi, N. Vassallo","doi":"10.2478/kjps-2018-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional analysis of the notion of knowledge seems to neglect that although we gather many of our beliefs under the flag of “knowledge” we do not always employ the same standards to bestow this title to them. The semantic thesis known as epistemic contextualism, instead, clearly vindicates and accounts for this phenomenon concerning our epistemic custom. Unfortunately, however, epistemic contextualism faces a severe objection – known in the philosophical literature as the factivity problem, – that seriously menaces its own survival. This objection, indeed, claims that the contextualist who endorses two well-known epistemological principles that he should not desire to give up (i.e. the","PeriodicalId":52005,"journal":{"name":"Kairos-Journal of Philosophy & Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"12 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge in Context: The Factivity Principle and Its Epistemological Consequences\",\"authors\":\"S. Leardi, N. Vassallo\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/kjps-2018-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The traditional analysis of the notion of knowledge seems to neglect that although we gather many of our beliefs under the flag of “knowledge” we do not always employ the same standards to bestow this title to them. The semantic thesis known as epistemic contextualism, instead, clearly vindicates and accounts for this phenomenon concerning our epistemic custom. Unfortunately, however, epistemic contextualism faces a severe objection – known in the philosophical literature as the factivity problem, – that seriously menaces its own survival. This objection, indeed, claims that the contextualist who endorses two well-known epistemological principles that he should not desire to give up (i.e. the\",\"PeriodicalId\":52005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kairos-Journal of Philosophy & Science\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"12 - 42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kairos-Journal of Philosophy & Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kairos-Journal of Philosophy & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge in Context: The Factivity Principle and Its Epistemological Consequences
The traditional analysis of the notion of knowledge seems to neglect that although we gather many of our beliefs under the flag of “knowledge” we do not always employ the same standards to bestow this title to them. The semantic thesis known as epistemic contextualism, instead, clearly vindicates and accounts for this phenomenon concerning our epistemic custom. Unfortunately, however, epistemic contextualism faces a severe objection – known in the philosophical literature as the factivity problem, – that seriously menaces its own survival. This objection, indeed, claims that the contextualist who endorses two well-known epistemological principles that he should not desire to give up (i.e. the