从住院病历中可以估计病人的虚弱程度吗?一项前瞻性队列研究

C. Marincowitz, V. Turner, V. Allgar, Jodie Bellwood, Alice Wheeler, M. Hale, Harriet Callaghan, A. Clegg, T. Sheldon
{"title":"从住院病历中可以估计病人的虚弱程度吗?一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"C. Marincowitz, V. Turner, V. Allgar, Jodie Bellwood, Alice Wheeler, M. Hale, Harriet Callaghan, A. Clegg, T. Sheldon","doi":"10.20900/agmr20200004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Frailty is a common condition in older people affecting around 1.8 million people in the UK and is independently associated with adverse outcomes. Frailty is commonly measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) which involves a face to face assessment. There is evidence the CFS can be assigned retrospectively from information in patient records, but no research has assessed whether scores can be assigned using routine inpatient records. We aimed to assess whether a CFS could be accurately assigned using hospital inpatient records in a UK setting. \nMethods: Forty newly admitted patients aged 65 and over were prospectively recruited at Bradford Royal Infirmary. A CFS score was assigned to each patient using a face to face assessment. A CFS score was independently assigned to each patient solely using information in the inpatient records. A quadratically weighted Cohen’s Kappa was used to estimate inter-rater reliability (IRR) between the assessments. \nResults: A Kappa of 0.84 was estimated for the IRR between the scores derived from a face to face assessment and those based solely on inpatient records, indicating good agreement. The Kappa score fell to 0.7 when a 4 category collapsed version of the CFS was used. The IRR appeared unaffected by the number of times a patient had been admitted recently. \nConclusion: The CSF may accurately be determined from data routinely recorded in inpatient records. Retrospectively derived scores can, therefore, be used in analysis of patient outcomes of older people in research and service improvement.","PeriodicalId":72094,"journal":{"name":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","volume":"201 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Patient Frailty Be Estimated from Inpatient Records? A Prospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"C. Marincowitz, V. Turner, V. Allgar, Jodie Bellwood, Alice Wheeler, M. Hale, Harriet Callaghan, A. Clegg, T. Sheldon\",\"doi\":\"10.20900/agmr20200004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Frailty is a common condition in older people affecting around 1.8 million people in the UK and is independently associated with adverse outcomes. Frailty is commonly measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) which involves a face to face assessment. There is evidence the CFS can be assigned retrospectively from information in patient records, but no research has assessed whether scores can be assigned using routine inpatient records. We aimed to assess whether a CFS could be accurately assigned using hospital inpatient records in a UK setting. \\nMethods: Forty newly admitted patients aged 65 and over were prospectively recruited at Bradford Royal Infirmary. A CFS score was assigned to each patient using a face to face assessment. A CFS score was independently assigned to each patient solely using information in the inpatient records. A quadratically weighted Cohen’s Kappa was used to estimate inter-rater reliability (IRR) between the assessments. \\nResults: A Kappa of 0.84 was estimated for the IRR between the scores derived from a face to face assessment and those based solely on inpatient records, indicating good agreement. The Kappa score fell to 0.7 when a 4 category collapsed version of the CFS was used. The IRR appeared unaffected by the number of times a patient had been admitted recently. \\nConclusion: The CSF may accurately be determined from data routinely recorded in inpatient records. Retrospectively derived scores can, therefore, be used in analysis of patient outcomes of older people in research and service improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in geriatric medicine and research\",\"volume\":\"201 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in geriatric medicine and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20200004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20200004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:虚弱是老年人的一种常见疾病,在英国约有180万人受到影响,并且与不良后果独立相关。虚弱通常用临床虚弱量表(CFS)来衡量,其中包括面对面的评估。有证据表明,可以根据患者记录中的信息对CFS进行回顾性评分,但没有研究评估是否可以使用常规住院记录进行评分。我们的目的是评估在英国是否可以使用医院住院记录准确地分配CFS。方法:前瞻性招募40例65岁及以上新入院的布拉德福德皇家医院患者。通过面对面评估给每位患者分配CFS评分。单独使用住院记录中的信息为每位患者分配CFS评分。使用二次加权的Cohen’s Kappa来估计评估之间的评级间信度(IRR)。结果:面对面评估所得的IRR与仅基于住院记录所得的IRR之间的Kappa估计为0.84,表明一致性良好。当使用4类压缩版的CFS时,Kappa评分降至0.7。IRR似乎不受患者最近入院次数的影响。结论:脑脊液可根据住院病历中常规记录的数据准确测定。因此,回顾性得出的评分可以用于分析老年人的研究和服务改进中的患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Patient Frailty Be Estimated from Inpatient Records? A Prospective Cohort Study
Background: Frailty is a common condition in older people affecting around 1.8 million people in the UK and is independently associated with adverse outcomes. Frailty is commonly measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) which involves a face to face assessment. There is evidence the CFS can be assigned retrospectively from information in patient records, but no research has assessed whether scores can be assigned using routine inpatient records. We aimed to assess whether a CFS could be accurately assigned using hospital inpatient records in a UK setting. Methods: Forty newly admitted patients aged 65 and over were prospectively recruited at Bradford Royal Infirmary. A CFS score was assigned to each patient using a face to face assessment. A CFS score was independently assigned to each patient solely using information in the inpatient records. A quadratically weighted Cohen’s Kappa was used to estimate inter-rater reliability (IRR) between the assessments. Results: A Kappa of 0.84 was estimated for the IRR between the scores derived from a face to face assessment and those based solely on inpatient records, indicating good agreement. The Kappa score fell to 0.7 when a 4 category collapsed version of the CFS was used. The IRR appeared unaffected by the number of times a patient had been admitted recently. Conclusion: The CSF may accurately be determined from data routinely recorded in inpatient records. Retrospectively derived scores can, therefore, be used in analysis of patient outcomes of older people in research and service improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Weakness Status is Differentially Associated with Time to Diabetes in Americans Falls and Alzheimer Disease. Meta-Analysis-Based Comparison of Annual Fall Risk between Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Sarcopenia as a Preoperative Risk Stratification Tool among Older Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Memory Loss and Missteps: Investigating Fall Risks in Alzheimer's and Dementia Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1