复杂的团结

IF 2.1 Q1 LINGUISTICS Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1075/ll.21036.the
Andre Joseph Theng, Vincent Wai Sum Tse, J. Wu
{"title":"复杂的团结","authors":"Andre Joseph Theng, Vincent Wai Sum Tse, J. Wu","doi":"10.1075/ll.21036.the","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Prior to the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in Hong Kong, there had been an extended period of civic unrest which began as\n opposition to an extradition bill but which later grew into a larger socio-political movement. We consider the relationship between ongoing\n political sentiments and the Covid-19 pandemic as evident through public signs; particularly, how commercial signage aligns and disaligns\n with government discourse on solidarity evident through recontextualization of the official tagline “Together, we fight the virus!” We\n suggest three analytical categories: (1) signs which demonstrate an alignment stance with the institutional sense of solidarity; (2)\n alignment with the pro-democracy movement, and thus disalignment from the institutional sense; and (3) politically ambiguous stances\n appealing to a broad understanding of solidarity for commercial gain. The pandemic occurring at a politically sensitive time has caused and\n made evident fractures in the way solidarity is construed, resulting in (dis)alignment and differing stances arising from the various social\n actors who have emplaced signs.","PeriodicalId":53129,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complicating solidarity\",\"authors\":\"Andre Joseph Theng, Vincent Wai Sum Tse, J. Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ll.21036.the\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Prior to the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in Hong Kong, there had been an extended period of civic unrest which began as\\n opposition to an extradition bill but which later grew into a larger socio-political movement. We consider the relationship between ongoing\\n political sentiments and the Covid-19 pandemic as evident through public signs; particularly, how commercial signage aligns and disaligns\\n with government discourse on solidarity evident through recontextualization of the official tagline “Together, we fight the virus!” We\\n suggest three analytical categories: (1) signs which demonstrate an alignment stance with the institutional sense of solidarity; (2)\\n alignment with the pro-democracy movement, and thus disalignment from the institutional sense; and (3) politically ambiguous stances\\n appealing to a broad understanding of solidarity for commercial gain. The pandemic occurring at a politically sensitive time has caused and\\n made evident fractures in the way solidarity is construed, resulting in (dis)alignment and differing stances arising from the various social\\n actors who have emplaced signs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21036.the\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21036.the","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在新冠肺炎疫情爆发之前,香港出现了一段较长时间的公民骚乱,最初是反对引渡法案,后来发展成为一场更大的社会政治运动。我们认为,当前的政治情绪与Covid-19大流行之间的关系已通过公共迹象得到明显体现;特别是,商业标牌与政府关于团结的话语是如何一致和不一致的,从官方标语“我们一起抗击病毒!”的重新语境中可以看出这一点。我们提出了三个分析类别:(1)表现出与制度团结感一致立场的迹象;(2)与亲民主运动结盟,从而与制度意义脱节;(3)政治上模棱两可的立场,呼吁对商业利益的广泛理解。在政治敏感时期发生的大流行病造成并造成了对团结的解释方式的明显断裂,导致放置标志的各种社会行为者出现(不一致)和不同立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Complicating solidarity
Prior to the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in Hong Kong, there had been an extended period of civic unrest which began as opposition to an extradition bill but which later grew into a larger socio-political movement. We consider the relationship between ongoing political sentiments and the Covid-19 pandemic as evident through public signs; particularly, how commercial signage aligns and disaligns with government discourse on solidarity evident through recontextualization of the official tagline “Together, we fight the virus!” We suggest three analytical categories: (1) signs which demonstrate an alignment stance with the institutional sense of solidarity; (2) alignment with the pro-democracy movement, and thus disalignment from the institutional sense; and (3) politically ambiguous stances appealing to a broad understanding of solidarity for commercial gain. The pandemic occurring at a politically sensitive time has caused and made evident fractures in the way solidarity is construed, resulting in (dis)alignment and differing stances arising from the various social actors who have emplaced signs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
30.40%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Semiotic landscape in a green capital Review of Kosatica (2022): The Burden of Traumascapes: Discourses of remembering in Bosnia-Herzegovina and beyond Exploring incongruity and humour in Linguistic Landscapes in Ghana The semiotics of Kosovo’s streetscapes The Linguistic Landscape of the war
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1