改革《能源约章条约》以促进可持续发展?

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.1080/02646811.2022.2040214
Paul V Thiessen
{"title":"改革《能源约章条约》以促进可持续发展?","authors":"Paul V Thiessen","doi":"10.1080/02646811.2022.2040214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses and evaluates the ongoing modernisation process of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). The ECT, an international investment agreement in force since 1998, has been subject to international criticism and is therefore currently undergoing a process of modernisation. The EU and its member states have a vital role to play in the process and are currently striving to align the ECT with more recent investment agreements. This submission aims to shed light on the feasibility, prospects and pitfalls of the modernisation process. For that purpose, it reviews and contextualises the amendments proposed by the EU with regards to the question of whether they are suitable for achieving their intended objectives and whether they are legally and politically feasible. It concludes that while each proposed amendment would be suitable in itself to achieve the objective pursued, the current process finds its limit in the political feasibility: any amendment requires a unanimous decision. As a result, the objectives may not be achieved. Therefore, this article suggests an alternative means to the current process through encouraging the maintenance of the positive impacts of the ECT while undergoing modernisation.","PeriodicalId":51867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming the Energy Charter Treaty for sustainability?\",\"authors\":\"Paul V Thiessen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02646811.2022.2040214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyses and evaluates the ongoing modernisation process of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). The ECT, an international investment agreement in force since 1998, has been subject to international criticism and is therefore currently undergoing a process of modernisation. The EU and its member states have a vital role to play in the process and are currently striving to align the ECT with more recent investment agreements. This submission aims to shed light on the feasibility, prospects and pitfalls of the modernisation process. For that purpose, it reviews and contextualises the amendments proposed by the EU with regards to the question of whether they are suitable for achieving their intended objectives and whether they are legally and politically feasible. It concludes that while each proposed amendment would be suitable in itself to achieve the objective pursued, the current process finds its limit in the political feasibility: any amendment requires a unanimous decision. As a result, the objectives may not be achieved. Therefore, this article suggests an alternative means to the current process through encouraging the maintenance of the positive impacts of the ECT while undergoing modernisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2022.2040214\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2022.2040214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析和评估了能源宪章条约(ECT)正在进行的现代化进程。ECT是一项自1998年生效的国际投资协议,一直受到国际社会的批评,因此目前正在经历一个现代化的过程。欧盟及其成员国在这一过程中发挥着至关重要的作用,目前正努力使ECT与最近的投资协议保持一致。这份意见书旨在阐明现代化进程的可行性、前景和陷阱。为此目的,委员会就欧盟提出的修正案是否适合实现其预期目标以及是否在法律上和政治上可行的问题,进行审查和综合考虑。它的结论是,虽然每一项拟议的修正案本身都适合实现所追求的目标,但目前的进程在政治可行性方面有其局限性:任何修正案都需要一致决定。结果,目标可能无法实现。因此,本文提出了一种替代目前过程的方法,即在进行现代化的同时鼓励维持ECT的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reforming the Energy Charter Treaty for sustainability?
This paper analyses and evaluates the ongoing modernisation process of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). The ECT, an international investment agreement in force since 1998, has been subject to international criticism and is therefore currently undergoing a process of modernisation. The EU and its member states have a vital role to play in the process and are currently striving to align the ECT with more recent investment agreements. This submission aims to shed light on the feasibility, prospects and pitfalls of the modernisation process. For that purpose, it reviews and contextualises the amendments proposed by the EU with regards to the question of whether they are suitable for achieving their intended objectives and whether they are legally and politically feasible. It concludes that while each proposed amendment would be suitable in itself to achieve the objective pursued, the current process finds its limit in the political feasibility: any amendment requires a unanimous decision. As a result, the objectives may not be achieved. Therefore, this article suggests an alternative means to the current process through encouraging the maintenance of the positive impacts of the ECT while undergoing modernisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Showcase panel – risk management for the swift implementation of energy transition projects Investor–state dispute settlement in natural resources, energy and environmental cases* The Right to a Healthy Environment in and Beyond the Anthropocene: A European Perspective IBA Section on Energy, Environment, Natural Resources and Infrastructure Presentation: ‘Net Zero and Natural Resources Law: Sovereignty, Security and Solidarity in the Clean Energy Transition’ (Oxford University Press, 2024) The Regulation of Decommissioning, Abandonment and Reuse Initiatives in the Oil and Gas Industry: From Obligation to Opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1