托克维尔在墨西哥

IF 0.6 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI:10.1080/14701847.2020.1789373
J. Rivera
{"title":"托克维尔在墨西哥","authors":"J. Rivera","doi":"10.1080/14701847.2020.1789373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article assesses the reception of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America in nineteenth-century Mexico. It explores the impact in two political debates at the time: judicial review (or the writ of amparo) and the question whether Mexico ought to be a central or a federal republic. Tocqueville was instrumental for the participants in those debates. The article examines the nature of these Tocquevillian interventions. Did Democracy in America enlighten the political dilemmas that actors faced at the time? Politicians and thinkers gave more importance to the descriptions of the American institutions that the book provided, and very often overlooked the importance of Tocqueville’s remarks on Mexico’s cultural and social inability to sustain democracy.","PeriodicalId":53911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"175 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tocqueville in Mexico\",\"authors\":\"J. Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14701847.2020.1789373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The article assesses the reception of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America in nineteenth-century Mexico. It explores the impact in two political debates at the time: judicial review (or the writ of amparo) and the question whether Mexico ought to be a central or a federal republic. Tocqueville was instrumental for the participants in those debates. The article examines the nature of these Tocquevillian interventions. Did Democracy in America enlighten the political dilemmas that actors faced at the time? Politicians and thinkers gave more importance to the descriptions of the American institutions that the book provided, and very often overlooked the importance of Tocqueville’s remarks on Mexico’s cultural and social inability to sustain democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"175 - 188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14701847.2020.1789373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14701847.2020.1789373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了19世纪墨西哥对托克维尔《美国的民主》的接受情况。它探讨了当时两场政治辩论的影响:司法审查(或宪法保护令)和墨西哥应该成为中央共和国还是联邦共和国的问题。托克维尔对这些辩论的参与者起到了重要作用。本文考察了这些托克维尔式干预的本质。《美国的民主》启发了演员们当时所面临的政治困境吗?政治家和思想家更重视书中对美国制度的描述,而往往忽视了托克维尔关于墨西哥文化和社会无法维持民主的言论的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tocqueville in Mexico
ABSTRACT The article assesses the reception of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America in nineteenth-century Mexico. It explores the impact in two political debates at the time: judicial review (or the writ of amparo) and the question whether Mexico ought to be a central or a federal republic. Tocqueville was instrumental for the participants in those debates. The article examines the nature of these Tocquevillian interventions. Did Democracy in America enlighten the political dilemmas that actors faced at the time? Politicians and thinkers gave more importance to the descriptions of the American institutions that the book provided, and very often overlooked the importance of Tocqueville’s remarks on Mexico’s cultural and social inability to sustain democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Introduction: revisiting the “second (short) wave” of democratisation in Latin America, 1943–1962 Intellectuals and democracy: the Argentine magazine Contorno (1953–1959) Brazilian reconstitutionalization in the second wave: a competition of democracies Democratization and inclusion: what women’s enfranchisement tells us about the second wave of democracy An uneven wave: Peronism and democracy in Argentina, 1946–1955
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1