超深水开发技术现状与挑战综述

G. Singhal, O. Dibua, D. Murray, Laurent Culembourg, P. Erb, E. Wensel, T. Makogon
{"title":"超深水开发技术现状与挑战综述","authors":"G. Singhal, O. Dibua, D. Murray, Laurent Culembourg, P. Erb, E. Wensel, T. Makogon","doi":"10.4043/29229-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A review of current technology limits and challenges that exist for surface facilities (topsides and hull), subsea and flow assurance aspects for ultra deepwater developments (>3,000m or 10,000ft) is presented. Gap assessments are performed to identify components that require development and / or qualification at greater water depths than their current design / qualification depth. Technology readiness level (TRL) is presented for assessment of existing technologies. A summary of current confidence level for various components of a field development (i.e. subsea, topsides, hull, mooring, risers) is also provided. Given the current state of the industry, the paper also addresses project economics, risks and uncertainties when evaluating opportunities in such water depths.","PeriodicalId":10948,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Technology Status and Challenges Associated with Ultra Deep Water Developments\",\"authors\":\"G. Singhal, O. Dibua, D. Murray, Laurent Culembourg, P. Erb, E. Wensel, T. Makogon\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/29229-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A review of current technology limits and challenges that exist for surface facilities (topsides and hull), subsea and flow assurance aspects for ultra deepwater developments (>3,000m or 10,000ft) is presented. Gap assessments are performed to identify components that require development and / or qualification at greater water depths than their current design / qualification depth. Technology readiness level (TRL) is presented for assessment of existing technologies. A summary of current confidence level for various components of a field development (i.e. subsea, topsides, hull, mooring, risers) is also provided. Given the current state of the industry, the paper also addresses project economics, risks and uncertainties when evaluating opportunities in such water depths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/29229-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29229-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

回顾了目前存在于水面设施(上层和船体)、海底和超深水开发(bbb30 000m或10,000ft)流动保障方面的技术限制和挑战。进行差距评估以确定需要在比当前设计/鉴定深度更大的水深下进行开发和/或鉴定的组件。技术准备水平(TRL)是为评估现有技术而提出的。此外,还提供了油田开发各个组件(即海底、上层、船体、系泊、隔水管)的当前置信度总结。考虑到目前的行业状况,本文还讨论了在评估此类水深的机会时的项目经济性、风险和不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review of Technology Status and Challenges Associated with Ultra Deep Water Developments
A review of current technology limits and challenges that exist for surface facilities (topsides and hull), subsea and flow assurance aspects for ultra deepwater developments (>3,000m or 10,000ft) is presented. Gap assessments are performed to identify components that require development and / or qualification at greater water depths than their current design / qualification depth. Technology readiness level (TRL) is presented for assessment of existing technologies. A summary of current confidence level for various components of a field development (i.e. subsea, topsides, hull, mooring, risers) is also provided. Given the current state of the industry, the paper also addresses project economics, risks and uncertainties when evaluating opportunities in such water depths.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing the New INCOSE Systems Engineering Competency Framework Using an Evidence Based Approach for Oil and Gas Companies A Machine Learning Application for Field Planning Optimization of Well Start-Up Using Integrated Well and Electrical Submersible Pump Modeling The Subsea Sand Management Challenge – What to Do with the Sand? Systems Engineering Principles to Enable Supplier-Led Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1