国际贸易文献引力模型的科学映射:文献计量学分析

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Scientometric Research Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI:10.5530/jscires.11.3.48
Preeti Sharma, S. Rohatgi, Deepmala Jasuja
{"title":"国际贸易文献引力模型的科学映射:文献计量学分析","authors":"Preeti Sharma, S. Rohatgi, Deepmala Jasuja","doi":"10.5530/jscires.11.3.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Gravity Model is the galloper of applied international trade literature. This model allows us to estimate trade-impacts of various trade related policies. Thousands of research studies have applied gravity models in their research works. The purpose of this paper is to look at bibliometric analysis of worldwide publication output based on a gravity model of international trade, as covered by Scopus from 1987 to 2021. The study analyses annual productivity, most productive source titles, prolific countries, eminent institutions, linguistic analysis and productivity of authors and their contribution in the subject area. According to the findings, Estimation of trade variables and projections are the most popular areas of subject specification, while in terms of literature gaps, estimation of economic integration, Extensive and Intensive Margin, and Logistics Performance Index receive less attention. 2019 was the most productive year for research on gravity models in international trade. In terms of contemporary research output, the United States, Germany, Spain, and China are the most productive countries; while as per citation analysis the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom are the top three countries. The most prolific journals for publishing works in the subject of the gravity model of international trade are Journal of International Economics, American Economic Review, and Review of Economics and Statistics. The study attempts to portray the existing literature more comprehensively by showing research collaborations and bibliographic coupling. The findings of this study can be useful to conduct further studies in the future.","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific Mapping of Gravity Model of International Trade Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Preeti Sharma, S. Rohatgi, Deepmala Jasuja\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/jscires.11.3.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Gravity Model is the galloper of applied international trade literature. This model allows us to estimate trade-impacts of various trade related policies. Thousands of research studies have applied gravity models in their research works. The purpose of this paper is to look at bibliometric analysis of worldwide publication output based on a gravity model of international trade, as covered by Scopus from 1987 to 2021. The study analyses annual productivity, most productive source titles, prolific countries, eminent institutions, linguistic analysis and productivity of authors and their contribution in the subject area. According to the findings, Estimation of trade variables and projections are the most popular areas of subject specification, while in terms of literature gaps, estimation of economic integration, Extensive and Intensive Margin, and Logistics Performance Index receive less attention. 2019 was the most productive year for research on gravity models in international trade. In terms of contemporary research output, the United States, Germany, Spain, and China are the most productive countries; while as per citation analysis the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom are the top three countries. The most prolific journals for publishing works in the subject of the gravity model of international trade are Journal of International Economics, American Economic Review, and Review of Economics and Statistics. The study attempts to portray the existing literature more comprehensively by showing research collaborations and bibliographic coupling. The findings of this study can be useful to conduct further studies in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scientometric Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scientometric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.3.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientometric Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.3.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引力模型是应用国际贸易文献中的一匹快马。该模型使我们能够估计各种贸易相关政策的贸易影响。成千上万的研究在他们的研究工作中应用了重力模型。本文的目的是研究基于国际贸易重力模型的全球出版物产出的文献计量分析,如Scopus从1987年到2021年所涵盖的。该研究分析了年度生产力、最多产的来源标题、多产的国家、著名的机构、语言分析和作者的生产力及其在主题领域的贡献。研究发现,贸易变量的估计和预测是学科规范中最受欢迎的领域,而在文献缺口方面,经济一体化、粗放和集约边际和物流绩效指数的估计受到的关注较少。2019年是国际贸易引力模型研究成果最多的一年。就当代研究产出而言,美国、德国、西班牙和中国是生产力最高的国家;而根据引文分析,美国、德国和英国是排名前三的国家。在国际贸易引力模型方面发表作品最多的期刊是《国际经济学杂志》、《美国经济评论》和《经济与统计评论》。本研究试图通过展示研究合作和书目耦合来更全面地描绘现有文献。本研究结果可为今后进一步的研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scientific Mapping of Gravity Model of International Trade Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis
The Gravity Model is the galloper of applied international trade literature. This model allows us to estimate trade-impacts of various trade related policies. Thousands of research studies have applied gravity models in their research works. The purpose of this paper is to look at bibliometric analysis of worldwide publication output based on a gravity model of international trade, as covered by Scopus from 1987 to 2021. The study analyses annual productivity, most productive source titles, prolific countries, eminent institutions, linguistic analysis and productivity of authors and their contribution in the subject area. According to the findings, Estimation of trade variables and projections are the most popular areas of subject specification, while in terms of literature gaps, estimation of economic integration, Extensive and Intensive Margin, and Logistics Performance Index receive less attention. 2019 was the most productive year for research on gravity models in international trade. In terms of contemporary research output, the United States, Germany, Spain, and China are the most productive countries; while as per citation analysis the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom are the top three countries. The most prolific journals for publishing works in the subject of the gravity model of international trade are Journal of International Economics, American Economic Review, and Review of Economics and Statistics. The study attempts to portray the existing literature more comprehensively by showing research collaborations and bibliographic coupling. The findings of this study can be useful to conduct further studies in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Scientometric Research
Journal of Scientometric Research INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Publications on Environmental Innovation Exploring the Impact of Altmetrics in Relation to Citation Count and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) Social Networking and Gender-Homophily in Article Publications: A Tale of Two Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) Nanotechnology in Food Production: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis Using R-package How do we Determine Content Boundaries in Systematic Review Studies of Management Research?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1