由于公证人的不当行为而对各方进行法律保护

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research Pub Date : 2022-05-22 DOI:10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25412
Gassanova Farah Diba, Wira Franciska, Felicitas Sri Marniati
{"title":"由于公证人的不当行为而对各方进行法律保护","authors":"Gassanova Farah Diba, Wira Franciska, Felicitas Sri Marniati","doi":"10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The involvement of a notary in a criminal case is caused by the negligence and carelessness of the notary. Such as the criminal act of falsifying the deed he made intentionally. As in several cases examined in this study. The type of research used in this research is normative juridical. The research approach used is a statutory approach, an analytical approach and a case approach. The results of the research obtained are the legal consequences of a Notary deed containing elements of forgery does not automatically result in the deed being null and void, because the aggrieved parties must file a civil lawsuit to the court to cancel the deed. If a court decision has permanent legal force, then the deed can be annulled. Notaries cannot be held criminally responsible for deed falsification if it is not proven that there was an intentional factor, because the Notary only records what was submitted by the parties to be included in the deed. False information submitted by the parties is the responsibility of the parties. However, if it is proven that there is an element of intent, the notary can be held criminally responsible.","PeriodicalId":40374,"journal":{"name":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Akibat Perbuatan Tindak Pidana Yang dilakukan Oleh Notaris\",\"authors\":\"Gassanova Farah Diba, Wira Franciska, Felicitas Sri Marniati\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The involvement of a notary in a criminal case is caused by the negligence and carelessness of the notary. Such as the criminal act of falsifying the deed he made intentionally. As in several cases examined in this study. The type of research used in this research is normative juridical. The research approach used is a statutory approach, an analytical approach and a case approach. The results of the research obtained are the legal consequences of a Notary deed containing elements of forgery does not automatically result in the deed being null and void, because the aggrieved parties must file a civil lawsuit to the court to cancel the deed. If a court decision has permanent legal force, then the deed can be annulled. Notaries cannot be held criminally responsible for deed falsification if it is not proven that there was an intentional factor, because the Notary only records what was submitted by the parties to be included in the deed. False information submitted by the parties is the responsibility of the parties. However, if it is proven that there is an element of intent, the notary can be held criminally responsible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公证员卷入刑事案件是由于公证员的过失和粗心造成的。比如故意伪造契约的犯罪行为。正如本研究中所研究的几个案例一样。本研究中使用的研究类型是规范法学。使用的研究方法是法定方法、分析方法和案例方法。所获得的研究结果是,含有伪造成分的公证契约的法律后果并不会自动导致该契约无效,因为受害方必须向法院提起民事诉讼以撤销该契约。如果法院判决具有永久法律效力,那么契约可以被撤销。如果没有证据证明存在故意因素,公证人不会对伪造契约承担刑事责任,因为公证人只记录各方提交的内容,以包括在契约中。当事人提交的虚假信息由当事人承担责任。但是,如果证明存在故意的成分,公证员可以被追究刑事责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Akibat Perbuatan Tindak Pidana Yang dilakukan Oleh Notaris
The involvement of a notary in a criminal case is caused by the negligence and carelessness of the notary. Such as the criminal act of falsifying the deed he made intentionally. As in several cases examined in this study. The type of research used in this research is normative juridical. The research approach used is a statutory approach, an analytical approach and a case approach. The results of the research obtained are the legal consequences of a Notary deed containing elements of forgery does not automatically result in the deed being null and void, because the aggrieved parties must file a civil lawsuit to the court to cancel the deed. If a court decision has permanent legal force, then the deed can be annulled. Notaries cannot be held criminally responsible for deed falsification if it is not proven that there was an intentional factor, because the Notary only records what was submitted by the parties to be included in the deed. False information submitted by the parties is the responsibility of the parties. However, if it is proven that there is an element of intent, the notary can be held criminally responsible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Fill in the Blank? A Discussion of Prefilled Tax Returns in the U.S. Does Notice 2014-21 Need an Update? An Analysis of Potential Tax Classifications for Cryptocurrency Covers and Front Matter Editorial Policy Pathology of The Legal Gap in the Tax Collection and Payment Stage (A Comparative Study of The IRS and The United States)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1