时效对临时冠和桥材料表面粗糙度的影响

Z. Abdullah, S. Dulaimi
{"title":"时效对临时冠和桥材料表面粗糙度的影响","authors":"Z. Abdullah, S. Dulaimi","doi":"10.46466/IDJ.V43I1.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Provisional dental restoration fabricated to enhance esthetic, stabilization of abutment teeth and maintain function for limited period of time after which it is to be replaced by definitive fixed restoration. The surface roughness of temporary crowns are considered crucial in achieving successful definite restorations. Most bacteria in the oral cavity can only survive on hard and rough surfaces. The objective of the present study is to evaluate and compare the surface roughness of two types of commercially available composite material (Harvard- temp and Charm- temp). The specimens were tested in dry conditions and after two weeks of storage in artificial saliva at 25⁰C. Material and Methods: A total of 32 specimens of dimensions 64mm×10mm×2.5mm were divided in two groups according to the type of material (Harvard-temp or Charm-temp). Each group of material has 16 specimens. These 16 specimens were divided in two groups: a control group (eight specimens) in dry conditions and an aging group (eight specimens) and stored in artificial saliva for two weeks. The TR 200 device was used to measure the surface roughness of specimens in micrometers (µm) before and after aging in artificial saliva. Results: After comparing the results, a significant difference was found in the surface roughness in dry and aging conditions of Harvard – temp (P 0.05). Conclusion: that in-vitro aging research might be an informative predictor of provisional materials’ properties before clinical application. Clinical significance: Both materials can perform adequately in the oral cavity for two weeks. However, the Charm temp mayperform more adequately and maintain good surface roughness.","PeriodicalId":78326,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Dental Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF AGING ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF PROVISIONAL CROWN AND BRIDGE MATERIAL\",\"authors\":\"Z. Abdullah, S. Dulaimi\",\"doi\":\"10.46466/IDJ.V43I1.265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Provisional dental restoration fabricated to enhance esthetic, stabilization of abutment teeth and maintain function for limited period of time after which it is to be replaced by definitive fixed restoration. The surface roughness of temporary crowns are considered crucial in achieving successful definite restorations. Most bacteria in the oral cavity can only survive on hard and rough surfaces. The objective of the present study is to evaluate and compare the surface roughness of two types of commercially available composite material (Harvard- temp and Charm- temp). The specimens were tested in dry conditions and after two weeks of storage in artificial saliva at 25⁰C. Material and Methods: A total of 32 specimens of dimensions 64mm×10mm×2.5mm were divided in two groups according to the type of material (Harvard-temp or Charm-temp). Each group of material has 16 specimens. These 16 specimens were divided in two groups: a control group (eight specimens) in dry conditions and an aging group (eight specimens) and stored in artificial saliva for two weeks. The TR 200 device was used to measure the surface roughness of specimens in micrometers (µm) before and after aging in artificial saliva. Results: After comparing the results, a significant difference was found in the surface roughness in dry and aging conditions of Harvard – temp (P 0.05). Conclusion: that in-vitro aging research might be an informative predictor of provisional materials’ properties before clinical application. Clinical significance: Both materials can perform adequately in the oral cavity for two weeks. However, the Charm temp mayperform more adequately and maintain good surface roughness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iraqi Dental Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iraqi Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46466/IDJ.V43I1.265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46466/IDJ.V43I1.265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要背景:临时牙修复是为了提高美观,稳定基牙并在有限的时间内维持功能而制造的,之后它将被确定的固定修复所取代。临时冠的表面粗糙度被认为是获得成功的确定修复的关键。口腔中的大多数细菌只能在坚硬粗糙的表面上存活。本研究的目的是评估和比较两种商用复合材料(Harvard- temp和Charm- temp)的表面粗糙度。标本在干燥条件下进行测试,并在25摄氏度的人工唾液中储存两周后进行测试。材料与方法:将32个尺寸为64mm×10mm×2.5mm的试件根据材料类型分为两组(Harvard-temp或Charm-temp)。每组材料有16个标本。将16份标本分为两组:干燥对照组(8份)和老化组(8份),在人工唾液中保存2周。用tr200仪器测量人工唾液老化前后样品的表面粗糙度,单位为微米(µm)。结果:经比较,在干燥和老化条件下,Harvard - temp的表面粗糙度有显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:体外老化研究可作为临时材料临床应用前性能的预测指标。临床意义:两种材料均可在口腔内发挥两周的作用。然而,魅力温度可能表现更充分,并保持良好的表面粗糙度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE EFFECT OF AGING ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF PROVISIONAL CROWN AND BRIDGE MATERIAL
Abstract Background: Provisional dental restoration fabricated to enhance esthetic, stabilization of abutment teeth and maintain function for limited period of time after which it is to be replaced by definitive fixed restoration. The surface roughness of temporary crowns are considered crucial in achieving successful definite restorations. Most bacteria in the oral cavity can only survive on hard and rough surfaces. The objective of the present study is to evaluate and compare the surface roughness of two types of commercially available composite material (Harvard- temp and Charm- temp). The specimens were tested in dry conditions and after two weeks of storage in artificial saliva at 25⁰C. Material and Methods: A total of 32 specimens of dimensions 64mm×10mm×2.5mm were divided in two groups according to the type of material (Harvard-temp or Charm-temp). Each group of material has 16 specimens. These 16 specimens were divided in two groups: a control group (eight specimens) in dry conditions and an aging group (eight specimens) and stored in artificial saliva for two weeks. The TR 200 device was used to measure the surface roughness of specimens in micrometers (µm) before and after aging in artificial saliva. Results: After comparing the results, a significant difference was found in the surface roughness in dry and aging conditions of Harvard – temp (P 0.05). Conclusion: that in-vitro aging research might be an informative predictor of provisional materials’ properties before clinical application. Clinical significance: Both materials can perform adequately in the oral cavity for two weeks. However, the Charm temp mayperform more adequately and maintain good surface roughness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE EFFECT OF AGING ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF PROVISIONAL CROWN AND BRIDGE MATERIAL PIEZOGRAPHIE IN THE SERVICE OF EDENTULOUS: CLINICAL CASE REPORT ASSESSMENT OF MENTAL FORAMEN POSITION IN DENTATE SUBJECTS INFLUENCE OF POST-OPERATIVE INSTRUCTIONS ON WOUND HEALING. A RANDOMIZED, SINGLE-BLINDED CLINICAL TRIAL. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED EXTRACTION OF MANDIBULAR MOLARS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE DENTOALVEOLAR ABSCESS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1