r/science的起起落落-在Reddit上探索科学传播的动态

IF 2 Q2 COMMUNICATION JCOM-Journal of Science Communication Pub Date : 2023-05-21 DOI:10.22323/2.22020208
Jonas Kaiser, Birte Fähnrich, Laura Heintz
{"title":"r/science的起起落落-在Reddit上探索科学传播的动态","authors":"Jonas Kaiser, Birte Fähnrich, Laura Heintz","doi":"10.22323/2.22020208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis exploratory study analyzed user-generated science communication on Reddit from May 2007 to October 2018 ($n=694.147$ posts). We used automated content analyses and topic modelling to explore patterns that the user-generated communication exhibits. Results indicate that science communication on “r/science” refers to a broad range of different topics and disciplines. Specific upvote features of Reddit result in increased attention to sources and topics. Especially, social media sources and content that is self-referential to Reddit lead to high controversy in discussions.","PeriodicalId":51818,"journal":{"name":"JCOM-Journal of Science Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ups and downs on “r/science” — exploring the dynamics of science communication on Reddit\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Kaiser, Birte Fähnrich, Laura Heintz\",\"doi\":\"10.22323/2.22020208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis exploratory study analyzed user-generated science communication on Reddit from May 2007 to October 2018 ($n=694.147$ posts). We used automated content analyses and topic modelling to explore patterns that the user-generated communication exhibits. Results indicate that science communication on “r/science” refers to a broad range of different topics and disciplines. Specific upvote features of Reddit result in increased attention to sources and topics. Especially, social media sources and content that is self-referential to Reddit lead to high controversy in discussions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCOM-Journal of Science Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCOM-Journal of Science Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22323/2.22020208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCOM-Journal of Science Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22323/2.22020208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项探索性研究分析了2007年5月至2018年10月Reddit上用户生成的科学传播($n=694.147$帖子)。我们使用自动化内容分析和主题建模来探索用户生成的通信所展示的模式。结果表明,“r/science”上的科学传播涉及广泛的主题和学科。Reddit的特定upvote功能增加了对来源和主题的关注。特别是,社交媒体资源和内容是Reddit的自我参考导致了讨论中的高度争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ups and downs on “r/science” — exploring the dynamics of science communication on Reddit
This exploratory study analyzed user-generated science communication on Reddit from May 2007 to October 2018 ($n=694.147$ posts). We used automated content analyses and topic modelling to explore patterns that the user-generated communication exhibits. Results indicate that science communication on “r/science” refers to a broad range of different topics and disciplines. Specific upvote features of Reddit result in increased attention to sources and topics. Especially, social media sources and content that is self-referential to Reddit lead to high controversy in discussions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
80
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Increasing culturally relevant science media coverage: exploring the outcomes of a collaboration in Puerto Rico. An analysis of science communication about COVID-19 vaccination in Portuguese online news media What would aliens think of science on earth? Philosophical dialogues in the museum to help children reflect about science Towards inclusive PE for science granting councils in Sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and opportunities Visualising science: a thorough guide for designing and using science graphics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1