强迫症的认知风格

IF 2.6 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/ppp.2023.a899943
C. Flores
{"title":"强迫症的认知风格","authors":"C. Flores","doi":"10.1353/ppp.2023.a899943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"* University of California, Irvine floreshc@uci.edu The author reports no conflict of interest. P ablo Hubacher Haerle’s excellent paper argues that there are cases of obsessivecompulsive disorder (OCD) (sexual OCD [S-OCD], specifically) in which people inquire in rational ways. If his analysis is correct, then OCD is not uniformly characterized by epistemic irrationality. The analysis of the cases is compelling, and it offers valuable new resources for understanding why (some) subjects with OCD persist in their inquiries. But I want to raise some questions about whether subjects really inquire rationally. To do so, I suggest a more comprehensive assessment of how these agents set different epistemic parameters. More generally, I will argue that by focusing on epistemic parameter settings and epistemic styles, we can clarify different loci of irrationality while de-stigmatizing OCD.","PeriodicalId":45397,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology","volume":"33 1","pages":"147 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic Style in OCD\",\"authors\":\"C. Flores\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ppp.2023.a899943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"* University of California, Irvine floreshc@uci.edu The author reports no conflict of interest. P ablo Hubacher Haerle’s excellent paper argues that there are cases of obsessivecompulsive disorder (OCD) (sexual OCD [S-OCD], specifically) in which people inquire in rational ways. If his analysis is correct, then OCD is not uniformly characterized by epistemic irrationality. The analysis of the cases is compelling, and it offers valuable new resources for understanding why (some) subjects with OCD persist in their inquiries. But I want to raise some questions about whether subjects really inquire rationally. To do so, I suggest a more comprehensive assessment of how these agents set different epistemic parameters. More generally, I will argue that by focusing on epistemic parameter settings and epistemic styles, we can clarify different loci of irrationality while de-stigmatizing OCD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"147 - 150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2023.a899943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2023.a899943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

*加州大学欧文分校floreshc@uci.edu作者报告无利益冲突。P ablo Hubacher Haerle的优秀论文认为,有些强迫症(特别是性强迫症)患者会以理性的方式进行询问。如果他的分析是正确的,那么强迫症并不是统一地以认知非理性为特征。对这些案例的分析是令人信服的,它为理解为什么(一些)强迫症患者坚持询问提供了宝贵的新资源。但我想提出一些问题,关于受试者是否真的理性地询问。为此,我建议对这些代理如何设置不同的认知参数进行更全面的评估。更一般地说,我认为通过关注认知参数设置和认知风格,我们可以在去污名化强迫症的同时澄清不同的非理性位点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epistemic Style in OCD
* University of California, Irvine floreshc@uci.edu The author reports no conflict of interest. P ablo Hubacher Haerle’s excellent paper argues that there are cases of obsessivecompulsive disorder (OCD) (sexual OCD [S-OCD], specifically) in which people inquire in rational ways. If his analysis is correct, then OCD is not uniformly characterized by epistemic irrationality. The analysis of the cases is compelling, and it offers valuable new resources for understanding why (some) subjects with OCD persist in their inquiries. But I want to raise some questions about whether subjects really inquire rationally. To do so, I suggest a more comprehensive assessment of how these agents set different epistemic parameters. More generally, I will argue that by focusing on epistemic parameter settings and epistemic styles, we can clarify different loci of irrationality while de-stigmatizing OCD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The Limits of Self-Constitution How to Measure Depression: Looking Back on the Making of Psychiatric Assessment Psychodramatic Psychotherapy for Schizophrenic Individuals About the Authors Close Enemies: The Relationship of Psychiatry and Psychology in the Assessment of Mental Disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1