州医疗委员会将如何处理涉及医疗事故披露和道歉的案件?

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of patient safety and risk management Pub Date : 2022-01-10 DOI:10.1177/25160435211070096
D. Wojcieszak
{"title":"州医疗委员会将如何处理涉及医疗事故披露和道歉的案件?","authors":"D. Wojcieszak","doi":"10.1177/25160435211070096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surveys were sent to 68 American state medical boards, including territories of the United States, inquiring how they handle—or will handle—cases involving disclosure and apology after medical errors. Surveys were not sent to specialty boards. Thirty-eight state medical boards (n  =  38, 56%) responded to the survey, with 31 completing the survey (46% completion rate) and seven boards (n  =  7) providing explanations for nonparticipation and other thoughts; 30 boards did not respond in any manner. Boards that completed the survey indicated that disclosure and apology and other positive post-event behavior by physicians are likely to be viewed favorably and disclosing physicians will not be easy targets for disciplinary measures, though boards also stressed they view each case on the merits and patient safety is their top priority. Recommendations are made for policy makers and other stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How will state medical boards handle cases involving disclosure and apology for medical errors?\",\"authors\":\"D. Wojcieszak\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25160435211070096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surveys were sent to 68 American state medical boards, including territories of the United States, inquiring how they handle—or will handle—cases involving disclosure and apology after medical errors. Surveys were not sent to specialty boards. Thirty-eight state medical boards (n  =  38, 56%) responded to the survey, with 31 completing the survey (46% completion rate) and seven boards (n  =  7) providing explanations for nonparticipation and other thoughts; 30 boards did not respond in any manner. Boards that completed the survey indicated that disclosure and apology and other positive post-event behavior by physicians are likely to be viewed favorably and disclosing physicians will not be easy targets for disciplinary measures, though boards also stressed they view each case on the merits and patient safety is their top priority. Recommendations are made for policy makers and other stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211070096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211070096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

调查被发送到美国68个州的医疗委员会,包括美国的领土,询问他们如何处理或将如何处理涉及医疗事故后披露和道歉的案件。调查没有发给专业委员会。38个州医学委员会(n = 38, 56%)回应了调查,其中31个完成了调查(完成率46%),7个委员会(n = 7)提供了不参与和其他想法的解释;30家董事会没有以任何方式作出回应。完成调查的委员会表示,医生的披露和道歉以及其他积极的事后行为可能会被视为有利的,披露的医生不会轻易成为纪律措施的目标,尽管委员会也强调他们会根据案情看待每个病例,患者安全是他们的首要任务。向决策者和其他利益攸关方提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How will state medical boards handle cases involving disclosure and apology for medical errors?
Surveys were sent to 68 American state medical boards, including territories of the United States, inquiring how they handle—or will handle—cases involving disclosure and apology after medical errors. Surveys were not sent to specialty boards. Thirty-eight state medical boards (n  =  38, 56%) responded to the survey, with 31 completing the survey (46% completion rate) and seven boards (n  =  7) providing explanations for nonparticipation and other thoughts; 30 boards did not respond in any manner. Boards that completed the survey indicated that disclosure and apology and other positive post-event behavior by physicians are likely to be viewed favorably and disclosing physicians will not be easy targets for disciplinary measures, though boards also stressed they view each case on the merits and patient safety is their top priority. Recommendations are made for policy makers and other stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient and family engagement in patient safety practices: A Making Healthcare Safer rapid response review The impact of nurse empowerment program on patient safety culture in general public hospital in Indonesia Updating Eindhoven: Clarifying the features of a patient safety near miss Shared decision-making in an era of silo-based care (or what it takes to Tango) Turkish adaptation and verification of the incident-reporting attitude scale used for staff in long-term care facilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1