在确定与道德选择有关的反应的个体特征时,脑电图独立成分的聚类

A. Bocharov, Q. A. Bogomaz, A. Savostyanov, G. Knyazev, A. Budakova, M. Zaleshin, T. Astakhova
{"title":"在确定与道德选择有关的反应的个体特征时,脑电图独立成分的聚类","authors":"A. Bocharov, Q. A. Bogomaz, A. Savostyanov, G. Knyazev, A. Budakova, M. Zaleshin, T. Astakhova","doi":"10.1109/SIBIRCON.2015.7361861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moral judgment can be defined as the evaluation of actions with respect to norms and values established in a society. In the modern world, morality is considered as the social capital, which determines a level of society well-being. Participants were showed 24 moral dilemma and 24 control task vignettes represented artist-sketched cartoons of control and dilemma scenarios. For all participants and every experimental condition, the model of localization equivalent dipoles electroenæphalogram (EEG) components was made. Individual localization of EEG electrodes was matched with a model of localization of electrodes of head, which was used for determining the equivalent dipoles. Event-related spectral perturbations were calculated to estimate induced responses via the EEGLAB toolbox. The dataset was prepared for clustering by the original PCA method. The correction for multiple comparisons was made by the False Discovery Rate method. To determine the correlations cortical sources of EEG activity with Social Intellect, sLORETA was applied to the data. Differences between moral dilemmas and control tasks without moral choice were found in delta, theta, alpha and beta diapasons in clusters localized in temporal and frontal lobe. Social intellect positively correlated with difference between the test interval and the baseline during making moral dilemma choice in theta in the left middle temporal gyrus and beta in the left middle frontal gyrus.","PeriodicalId":6503,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Technologies (SIBIRCON)","volume":"109 1","pages":"104-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clustering of independent components of EEG in determining individual characteristics of reactions related to a moral choice\",\"authors\":\"A. Bocharov, Q. A. Bogomaz, A. Savostyanov, G. Knyazev, A. Budakova, M. Zaleshin, T. Astakhova\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIBIRCON.2015.7361861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Moral judgment can be defined as the evaluation of actions with respect to norms and values established in a society. In the modern world, morality is considered as the social capital, which determines a level of society well-being. Participants were showed 24 moral dilemma and 24 control task vignettes represented artist-sketched cartoons of control and dilemma scenarios. For all participants and every experimental condition, the model of localization equivalent dipoles electroenæphalogram (EEG) components was made. Individual localization of EEG electrodes was matched with a model of localization of electrodes of head, which was used for determining the equivalent dipoles. Event-related spectral perturbations were calculated to estimate induced responses via the EEGLAB toolbox. The dataset was prepared for clustering by the original PCA method. The correction for multiple comparisons was made by the False Discovery Rate method. To determine the correlations cortical sources of EEG activity with Social Intellect, sLORETA was applied to the data. Differences between moral dilemmas and control tasks without moral choice were found in delta, theta, alpha and beta diapasons in clusters localized in temporal and frontal lobe. Social intellect positively correlated with difference between the test interval and the baseline during making moral dilemma choice in theta in the left middle temporal gyrus and beta in the left middle frontal gyrus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Technologies (SIBIRCON)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"104-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Technologies (SIBIRCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBIRCON.2015.7361861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Technologies (SIBIRCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBIRCON.2015.7361861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

道德判断可以定义为对社会中建立的规范和价值观的行为的评价。在现代社会,道德被认为是一种社会资本,它决定着一个社会的幸福水平。参与者被展示了24个道德困境和24个控制任务小插曲,这些小插曲代表了艺术家绘制的控制和困境场景的漫画。针对所有被试和每个实验条件,建立了等效偶极子EEG成分的局部化模型。将脑电电极的个体定位与头部电极定位模型相匹配,利用该模型确定等效偶极子。通过EEGLAB工具箱计算与事件相关的谱扰动来估计诱导响应。采用原始PCA方法对数据集进行聚类处理。采用错误发现率法对多重比较进行校正。为了确定脑电图活动的皮层源与社会智力的相关性,我们对数据进行了sLORETA分析。道德困境与无道德选择的控制任务在颞叶和额叶的δ、θ、α和β偶波中存在差异。社会智力与道德困境选择时测试间隔与基线的差异在左颞中回θ和左额中回β中呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clustering of independent components of EEG in determining individual characteristics of reactions related to a moral choice
Moral judgment can be defined as the evaluation of actions with respect to norms and values established in a society. In the modern world, morality is considered as the social capital, which determines a level of society well-being. Participants were showed 24 moral dilemma and 24 control task vignettes represented artist-sketched cartoons of control and dilemma scenarios. For all participants and every experimental condition, the model of localization equivalent dipoles electroenæphalogram (EEG) components was made. Individual localization of EEG electrodes was matched with a model of localization of electrodes of head, which was used for determining the equivalent dipoles. Event-related spectral perturbations were calculated to estimate induced responses via the EEGLAB toolbox. The dataset was prepared for clustering by the original PCA method. The correction for multiple comparisons was made by the False Discovery Rate method. To determine the correlations cortical sources of EEG activity with Social Intellect, sLORETA was applied to the data. Differences between moral dilemmas and control tasks without moral choice were found in delta, theta, alpha and beta diapasons in clusters localized in temporal and frontal lobe. Social intellect positively correlated with difference between the test interval and the baseline during making moral dilemma choice in theta in the left middle temporal gyrus and beta in the left middle frontal gyrus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of organization and control of multielectrode neuro-electrostimulation device Digraph based medical treatment planning Feasibility of a capnometry device for respiratory biofeedback in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery Computer modeling of stress-strain state of the intact portion of the coronary artery with circular irregular stenosis Multiplex detection of IgG class antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii, Rubella virus, Cytomegalovirus and Herpes virus using a novel multiplex flow immunoassay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1