折旧净现值和内部收益率在工程项目中的应用综述

Pema Wangchuk
{"title":"折旧净现值和内部收益率在工程项目中的应用综述","authors":"Pema Wangchuk","doi":"10.54417/jaetm.v2i1.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Depreciation Methods are employed in most engineering projects to visualize the true potential of Return on Investment (ROI) in today’s capital investment world. Most previous studies have appreciated and indicated the usefulness of each method in determining economically feasible projects. However, some previous studies have applied all methods without a proper distinction between budgeting and accounting concepts and lacked insights into various situations under which each method has differed. This paper aims to explore the circumstances in which all methods differ to determine the most economically and optimal project alternatives. It describes a thematic literature review of the past 17 articles like the peer-reviewed conference and journal articles published from 1969 through 2021. The articles with citations have been randomly selected to analyze the data. The results indicate that the three methods are commonly used in all engineering projects under certain conditions. It concludes that NPV and IRR are capital budgeting methods based on discounted cash flow methods while depreciation is the accounting method based on non-cash discounted methods. The results also demonstrate that different depreciation methods are also employed throughout the project evaluation process to determine the best project alternatives. For an engineer to produce the results and make effective investment decisions, estimating the cost, predicting the savings, and acclimatizing to the budgeting and accounting concepts are crucial under each method.","PeriodicalId":38544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APPLICATION OF DEPRECIATION NET PRESENT VALUE AND INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN IN ENGINEERING PROJECTS A BRIEF LITERATURE REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"Pema Wangchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.54417/jaetm.v2i1.55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Depreciation Methods are employed in most engineering projects to visualize the true potential of Return on Investment (ROI) in today’s capital investment world. Most previous studies have appreciated and indicated the usefulness of each method in determining economically feasible projects. However, some previous studies have applied all methods without a proper distinction between budgeting and accounting concepts and lacked insights into various situations under which each method has differed. This paper aims to explore the circumstances in which all methods differ to determine the most economically and optimal project alternatives. It describes a thematic literature review of the past 17 articles like the peer-reviewed conference and journal articles published from 1969 through 2021. The articles with citations have been randomly selected to analyze the data. The results indicate that the three methods are commonly used in all engineering projects under certain conditions. It concludes that NPV and IRR are capital budgeting methods based on discounted cash flow methods while depreciation is the accounting method based on non-cash discounted methods. The results also demonstrate that different depreciation methods are also employed throughout the project evaluation process to determine the best project alternatives. For an engineer to produce the results and make effective investment decisions, estimating the cost, predicting the savings, and acclimatizing to the budgeting and accounting concepts are crucial under each method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54417/jaetm.v2i1.55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54417/jaetm.v2i1.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

净现值(NPV)、内部收益率(IRR)和折旧方法被用于大多数工程项目中,以可视化当今资本投资世界中投资回报率(ROI)的真正潜力。以前的大多数研究都赞赏并指出每种方法在确定经济上可行的项目方面的有用性。然而,以前的一些研究在没有适当区分预算和会计概念的情况下应用了所有方法,并且缺乏对每种方法不同的各种情况的见解。本文旨在探讨各种方法不同的情况,以确定最经济和最优的项目选择。它描述了对过去17篇文章的专题文献综述,如1969年至2021年发表的同行评议会议和期刊文章。随机选取被引用的文章进行数据分析。结果表明,在一定条件下,这三种方法在所有工程项目中都是通用的。得出NPV和IRR是基于现金流折现法的资本预算方法,折旧是基于非现金折现法的会计方法。结果还表明,在整个项目评估过程中,也采用了不同的折旧方法来确定最佳的项目替代方案。对于工程师来说,要产生结果并做出有效的投资决策,估算成本、预测节省以及适应预算和会计概念在每种方法下都是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
APPLICATION OF DEPRECIATION NET PRESENT VALUE AND INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN IN ENGINEERING PROJECTS A BRIEF LITERATURE REVIEW
The Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Depreciation Methods are employed in most engineering projects to visualize the true potential of Return on Investment (ROI) in today’s capital investment world. Most previous studies have appreciated and indicated the usefulness of each method in determining economically feasible projects. However, some previous studies have applied all methods without a proper distinction between budgeting and accounting concepts and lacked insights into various situations under which each method has differed. This paper aims to explore the circumstances in which all methods differ to determine the most economically and optimal project alternatives. It describes a thematic literature review of the past 17 articles like the peer-reviewed conference and journal articles published from 1969 through 2021. The articles with citations have been randomly selected to analyze the data. The results indicate that the three methods are commonly used in all engineering projects under certain conditions. It concludes that NPV and IRR are capital budgeting methods based on discounted cash flow methods while depreciation is the accounting method based on non-cash discounted methods. The results also demonstrate that different depreciation methods are also employed throughout the project evaluation process to determine the best project alternatives. For an engineer to produce the results and make effective investment decisions, estimating the cost, predicting the savings, and acclimatizing to the budgeting and accounting concepts are crucial under each method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EXAMINING THE INFLUENCE OF ON-JOB TRAINING (OJT) ON STUDENT LEARNING: A STUDY FOCUSING ON THE 6TH COHORT OF THE DIPLOMA IN MATERIALS AND PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AT JIGME NAMGYEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE IN DEWATHANG STUDY ON SPATIAL-TEMPORAL URBAN GROWTH AND LAND CONSUMPTION PATTERNS OF THIMPHU, BHUTAN USING MULTI-TEMPORAL SATELLITE IMAGES WIND POWER FORECASTING USING MACHINE LEARNING IN BHUTAN AUTOMATED WHEELCHAIR FOR DIFFERENTLY ABLED PERSON WITH FALL DETECTION AND MANEUVERABILITY FOREST FIRE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING OF BHUTAN USING LOGISTIC REGRESSION AND FREQUENCY RATIO MODEL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1