评估幼儿社会情绪筛选工具的维度和心理测量特性

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Infants & Young Children Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.1097/IYC.0000000000000163
C. Chen, J. Squires, Kathleen Scalise
{"title":"评估幼儿社会情绪筛选工具的维度和心理测量特性","authors":"C. Chen, J. Squires, Kathleen Scalise","doi":"10.1097/IYC.0000000000000163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Social–emotional competence is important for children's lifelong positive developmental outcomes. The dimensionality and psychometric properties of a widely used social–emotional assessment, the Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Social–Emotional Second Edition (ASQ:SE-2), were investigated in this study using item response theory models. A comparison was conducted between a unidimensional model, reflecting a compound construct—social–emotional competence, and a multidimensional model, based on the theoretical framework that posits that social competence and emotional competence are highly related but different constructs. The result indicated that the multidimensional structure presented a better fit for the ASQ:SE-2 sample across most intervals (i.e., 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months). The psychometric properties estimated by the multidimensional model reflected congruence between the levels of item difficulty and the design of the ASQ:SE-2 and indicated a high quality of items based on the fit item statistics. However, the expected a posteriori/plausible value reliability estimates for several younger age intervals (i.e., 6, 12, 18, and 24 months) did not meet the 0.70 benchmark. The relationship between the 2 dimensions presented a moderate correlation during infancy (r = .43–.56) and a stronger relationship in older ages (r = .71–.83).","PeriodicalId":47099,"journal":{"name":"Infants & Young Children","volume":"31 1","pages":"142 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Dimensionality and Psychometric Properties of a Social–Emotional Screening Instrument for Young Children\",\"authors\":\"C. Chen, J. Squires, Kathleen Scalise\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IYC.0000000000000163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Social–emotional competence is important for children's lifelong positive developmental outcomes. The dimensionality and psychometric properties of a widely used social–emotional assessment, the Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Social–Emotional Second Edition (ASQ:SE-2), were investigated in this study using item response theory models. A comparison was conducted between a unidimensional model, reflecting a compound construct—social–emotional competence, and a multidimensional model, based on the theoretical framework that posits that social competence and emotional competence are highly related but different constructs. The result indicated that the multidimensional structure presented a better fit for the ASQ:SE-2 sample across most intervals (i.e., 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months). The psychometric properties estimated by the multidimensional model reflected congruence between the levels of item difficulty and the design of the ASQ:SE-2 and indicated a high quality of items based on the fit item statistics. However, the expected a posteriori/plausible value reliability estimates for several younger age intervals (i.e., 6, 12, 18, and 24 months) did not meet the 0.70 benchmark. The relationship between the 2 dimensions presented a moderate correlation during infancy (r = .43–.56) and a stronger relationship in older ages (r = .71–.83).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infants & Young Children\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"142 - 159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infants & Young Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infants & Young Children","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

补充数字内容可在文本中获得。社会情感能力对儿童终身的积极发展结果至关重要。本研究运用项目反应理论模型,对广泛使用的社会情绪评估量表《年龄与阶段社会情绪问卷第二版》(ASQ:SE-2)的维度和心理测量特征进行了研究。基于社会能力和情感能力是高度相关但不同构式的理论框架,对反映社会-情感能力复合构式的一维模型和反映社会-情感能力复合构式的多维模型进行了比较。结果表明,在6、12、18、24、30、36、48和60个月的大部分时间间隔内,多维结构对ASQ:SE-2样本的拟合效果较好。多维模型估计的心理测量属性反映了题目难度水平与ASQ:SE-2的设计之间的一致性,表明基于拟合项目统计的题目质量较高。然而,对几个较年轻的年龄区间(即6、12、18和24个月)的预期后验/似然值信度估计不符合0.70基准。两个维度之间的关系在婴儿期呈中等相关性(r = 0.43 ~ 0.56),在老年期呈较强相关性(r = 0.71 ~ 0.83)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Dimensionality and Psychometric Properties of a Social–Emotional Screening Instrument for Young Children
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Social–emotional competence is important for children's lifelong positive developmental outcomes. The dimensionality and psychometric properties of a widely used social–emotional assessment, the Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Social–Emotional Second Edition (ASQ:SE-2), were investigated in this study using item response theory models. A comparison was conducted between a unidimensional model, reflecting a compound construct—social–emotional competence, and a multidimensional model, based on the theoretical framework that posits that social competence and emotional competence are highly related but different constructs. The result indicated that the multidimensional structure presented a better fit for the ASQ:SE-2 sample across most intervals (i.e., 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months). The psychometric properties estimated by the multidimensional model reflected congruence between the levels of item difficulty and the design of the ASQ:SE-2 and indicated a high quality of items based on the fit item statistics. However, the expected a posteriori/plausible value reliability estimates for several younger age intervals (i.e., 6, 12, 18, and 24 months) did not meet the 0.70 benchmark. The relationship between the 2 dimensions presented a moderate correlation during infancy (r = .43–.56) and a stronger relationship in older ages (r = .71–.83).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Infants & Young Children is an interdisciplinary journal focusing on vulnerable children from birth to five years of age and their families. Of special interest are articles involving innovative interventions, summaries of important research developments and their implications for practice, updates for high priority topic areas, balanced presentations of controversial issues, and articles that address issues involving policy, professional training, new conceptual models, and related matters. Although data are often presented primarily to illustrate points, some types of data-based articles may be appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Service Referrals and Uptake in Early Head Start: The Importance of Care Setting. Correlations Between State-Level Monitoring and Screening Rates and Early Identified ASD/DD Across Racial and Ethnic Groups Investigating the Impact of a Motor Program on Preschoolers With Disabilities Preparing Preschool Educators to Monitor Child Progress Early Identification of Developmental Language Delay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1