仍然悬而未决的问题是:政府对航空公司网站的监管,以及残疾人士在线上持续的价格不平等

J. Lazar, P. Jaeger, A. Olalere, Mugren Algarne, Z. Augustine, Connor Brown, F. D'Erasmo, Brian W. Dotson, Gene Endiape, Louette Govender, Niftalem Hagos, Gregory Hunt, W. Lawrence, Robert Plummer, A. Richardson, Justin Saval, Christopher Schickling, C. Schley, Douglas Szoka, R. Torrie, Michael Walton
{"title":"仍然悬而未决的问题是:政府对航空公司网站的监管,以及残疾人士在线上持续的价格不平等","authors":"J. Lazar, P. Jaeger, A. Olalere, Mugren Algarne, Z. Augustine, Connor Brown, F. D'Erasmo, Brian W. Dotson, Gene Endiape, Louette Govender, Niftalem Hagos, Gregory Hunt, W. Lawrence, Robert Plummer, A. Richardson, Justin Saval, Christopher Schickling, C. Schley, Douglas Szoka, R. Torrie, Michael Walton","doi":"10.1145/2307729.2307768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"US Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations require that persons with disabilities not be discriminated against in the pricing of airline travel. To comply with these regulations, the websites of airlines are not currently required to be accessible for persons with disabilities. However, if an airline website is inaccessible, the airline must offer to customers with disabilities over the phone the same price that is available on the website and may not charge a fee for purchasing tickets over the phone. A 2009 data collection effort (published in 2010) of the application of these government regulations in cyberspace found many cases of airline non-compliance with the regulations, resulting in price discrimination against airline passengers with disabilities. This paper reports the findings of a follow-up study conducted in 2011 to determine if any progress has been made in a two- year period, revealing mixed results in the attention paid to the regulations. Some airlines still are charging higher fares or including call center fees at rates of 30% to 90%. This paper details the findings from the 2011 data collection and analyzes the data in terms of website accessibility, civil rights for travelers with disabilities, and e-government policy implications.","PeriodicalId":93488,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Still up in the air: government regulation of airline websites and continuing price inequality for persons with disabilities online\",\"authors\":\"J. Lazar, P. Jaeger, A. Olalere, Mugren Algarne, Z. Augustine, Connor Brown, F. D'Erasmo, Brian W. Dotson, Gene Endiape, Louette Govender, Niftalem Hagos, Gregory Hunt, W. Lawrence, Robert Plummer, A. Richardson, Justin Saval, Christopher Schickling, C. Schley, Douglas Szoka, R. Torrie, Michael Walton\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2307729.2307768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"US Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations require that persons with disabilities not be discriminated against in the pricing of airline travel. To comply with these regulations, the websites of airlines are not currently required to be accessible for persons with disabilities. However, if an airline website is inaccessible, the airline must offer to customers with disabilities over the phone the same price that is available on the website and may not charge a fee for purchasing tickets over the phone. A 2009 data collection effort (published in 2010) of the application of these government regulations in cyberspace found many cases of airline non-compliance with the regulations, resulting in price discrimination against airline passengers with disabilities. This paper reports the findings of a follow-up study conducted in 2011 to determine if any progress has been made in a two- year period, revealing mixed results in the attention paid to the regulations. Some airlines still are charging higher fares or including call center fees at rates of 30% to 90%. This paper details the findings from the 2011 data collection and analyzes the data in terms of website accessibility, civil rights for travelers with disabilities, and e-government policy implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2307729.2307768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2307729.2307768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

美国运输部(DOT)规定,在航空旅行的定价中不得歧视残疾人。为了遵守这些规定,航空公司的网站目前并不要求残疾人可以访问。但是,如果航空公司的网站无法访问,航空公司必须通过电话向残疾乘客提供与网站上相同的价格,并且不得对通过电话购买机票收取费用。2009年的一项数据收集工作(发布于2010年)发现,许多航空公司不遵守这些规定,导致对航空公司残疾乘客的价格歧视。本文报告了2011年进行的一项后续研究的结果,以确定在两年的时间内是否取得了任何进展,揭示了对法规的关注的好坏参半的结果。一些航空公司仍在收取更高的票价,或者将呼叫中心的费用加成30%至90%。本文详细介绍了2011年数据收集的结果,并从网站可访问性、残障旅行者的公民权利和电子政务政策影响等方面分析了数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Still up in the air: government regulation of airline websites and continuing price inequality for persons with disabilities online
US Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations require that persons with disabilities not be discriminated against in the pricing of airline travel. To comply with these regulations, the websites of airlines are not currently required to be accessible for persons with disabilities. However, if an airline website is inaccessible, the airline must offer to customers with disabilities over the phone the same price that is available on the website and may not charge a fee for purchasing tickets over the phone. A 2009 data collection effort (published in 2010) of the application of these government regulations in cyberspace found many cases of airline non-compliance with the regulations, resulting in price discrimination against airline passengers with disabilities. This paper reports the findings of a follow-up study conducted in 2011 to determine if any progress has been made in a two- year period, revealing mixed results in the attention paid to the regulations. Some airlines still are charging higher fares or including call center fees at rates of 30% to 90%. This paper details the findings from the 2011 data collection and analyzes the data in terms of website accessibility, civil rights for travelers with disabilities, and e-government policy implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Misinformation Threat: A Techno-Governance Approach for Curbing the Fake News of Tomorrow Book Review: Recoding America- Why Government is Failing in the Digital Age and How we can Do Better Challenges in AI-supported process analysis in the Italian judicial system: what after digitalization? PLUS: A Semi-automated Pipeline for Fraud Detection in Public Bids How Does the Citizen's Education Level Affect Their Internet Rights Protection Willingness? ——The Parallel Intermediary Effect of Digital Information Acquisition Ability and Utilization Ability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1