Lytocescestus mastacembellusi

K. S. Pardeshi
{"title":"Lytocescestus mastacembellusi","authors":"K. S. Pardeshi","doi":"10.18535/IJSRE/V4I04.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The genus Lytocestus was erected by Cohn, 1908 with its type species L. adhaerens, found in Clarias fuscus in Hong Kong. This genus was first confirmed by Woodland (1926), who included four more species in the addition to the type species. They are L filiformis woodland (1923), in Mormyrus caschive, Egyptian Sudan, L chalmersius woodland (1924), L cunningtoni Fuhrman and Baer (1925), and L Indicus Moghe (1925) (syn. Caryophyllaceous Indicus ) from Clarias batrachus in India. The same were recorded by Mehra (1930) from Clarias magur and Ramadevi (1973) from Clarias batrachus in India. Hunter (1927) placed the genus in subfamily of his own namely, Lytocestinae and retained only three species i.e. L adhaerens, L filiformis and L Indicus. He put the species L cunningtoni and chalmersius in the genus Monobothriodides. Subsequent workers Gupta (1969), Murhar (1963), have adhered to these changes. Wardle and McLeod (1952) followed Hunters classification but raised the status of Lytocestinae from Subfamily to a family. Wardle, McLeod and Radinovsky (1974) suggested new classification of Cestode, who used the term Cotyloda as a class. Mickiewicz (1972) included the species L javanicus Bovien (1926), Furtado (1963), Lynsdale (1956) and L parvulus Furtado (1963), in this genus. Johyi (1959) Considered L. alestesi as synonym of L birmanicus Lynsdale (1956), but Mickiewicz (1972) after examination of Original material L. alestesi Lynsdale (1956) conclude that, It should be considered a synonym of L. filiformis woodland (1923). Ramadevi (1973) described L. longicollis from Clarias batrachus in India. All the eight species come from East Asian countries. The present communication, deals with the description of a new species under the same genus, as Lytocestus mastacembellusi n. sp. collected from Mastacembellusi armatus, at Paitan, Dist. Aurangabad, M. S. India.","PeriodicalId":14282,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cestode: Lytocescestus mastacembellusi\",\"authors\":\"K. S. Pardeshi\",\"doi\":\"10.18535/IJSRE/V4I04.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The genus Lytocestus was erected by Cohn, 1908 with its type species L. adhaerens, found in Clarias fuscus in Hong Kong. This genus was first confirmed by Woodland (1926), who included four more species in the addition to the type species. They are L filiformis woodland (1923), in Mormyrus caschive, Egyptian Sudan, L chalmersius woodland (1924), L cunningtoni Fuhrman and Baer (1925), and L Indicus Moghe (1925) (syn. Caryophyllaceous Indicus ) from Clarias batrachus in India. The same were recorded by Mehra (1930) from Clarias magur and Ramadevi (1973) from Clarias batrachus in India. Hunter (1927) placed the genus in subfamily of his own namely, Lytocestinae and retained only three species i.e. L adhaerens, L filiformis and L Indicus. He put the species L cunningtoni and chalmersius in the genus Monobothriodides. Subsequent workers Gupta (1969), Murhar (1963), have adhered to these changes. Wardle and McLeod (1952) followed Hunters classification but raised the status of Lytocestinae from Subfamily to a family. Wardle, McLeod and Radinovsky (1974) suggested new classification of Cestode, who used the term Cotyloda as a class. Mickiewicz (1972) included the species L javanicus Bovien (1926), Furtado (1963), Lynsdale (1956) and L parvulus Furtado (1963), in this genus. Johyi (1959) Considered L. alestesi as synonym of L birmanicus Lynsdale (1956), but Mickiewicz (1972) after examination of Original material L. alestesi Lynsdale (1956) conclude that, It should be considered a synonym of L. filiformis woodland (1923). Ramadevi (1973) described L. longicollis from Clarias batrachus in India. All the eight species come from East Asian countries. The present communication, deals with the description of a new species under the same genus, as Lytocestus mastacembellusi n. sp. collected from Mastacembellusi armatus, at Paitan, Dist. Aurangabad, M. S. India.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Scientific Research in Education\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Scientific Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18535/IJSRE/V4I04.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18535/IJSRE/V4I04.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Lytocestus属由Cohn(1908)建立,其模式种为L. adhaerens,发现于香港的fuscus Clarias。该属最早由Woodland(1926)确认,他在模式种之外又增加了四个种。它们是来自埃及苏丹Mormyrus caschive的L . filiformis林地(1923),L . chalmersius林地(1924),L . cunningtoni Fuhrman和Baer(1925),以及来自印度Clarias batrachus的L . Indicus Moghe(1925)(同为石竹属Indicus)。来自印度Clarias magur的Mehra(1930)和来自Clarias batrachus的Ramadevi(1973)也记录了同样的情况。Hunter(1927)将该属归入自己的Lytocestinae亚科,只保留了L adhaerens、L filiformis和L Indicus三个种。他将L cunningtoni和chalmersius归入Monobothriodides属。随后的工人Gupta (1969), Murhar(1963),都坚持这些变化。Wardle和McLeod(1952)沿用了Hunters的分类方法,但将Lytocestinae从亚科提升到一个科。Wardle, McLeod和Radinovsky(1974)提出了对Cestode的新分类,他们使用子叶纲(Cotyloda)一词作为一个纲。Mickiewicz(1972)将L javanicus Bovien(1926)、Furtado(1963)、Lynsdale(1956)和L parvulus Furtado(1963)列入该属。Johyi(1959)认为L. alestesi是L birmanicus Lynsdale(1956)的同义词,但Mickiewicz(1972)在检查原始材料L. alestesi Lynsdale(1956)后得出结论,它应该被认为是L. filiformis woodland(1923)的同义词。Ramadevi(1973)描述了产自印度batrachus的L. longicollis。这八种都来自东亚国家。本文报道了同一属的一新种Lytocestus mastacrouusi n. sp.采集自印度邦奥兰加巴德区Paitan地区的mastacrouusi armatus。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cestode: Lytocescestus mastacembellusi
The genus Lytocestus was erected by Cohn, 1908 with its type species L. adhaerens, found in Clarias fuscus in Hong Kong. This genus was first confirmed by Woodland (1926), who included four more species in the addition to the type species. They are L filiformis woodland (1923), in Mormyrus caschive, Egyptian Sudan, L chalmersius woodland (1924), L cunningtoni Fuhrman and Baer (1925), and L Indicus Moghe (1925) (syn. Caryophyllaceous Indicus ) from Clarias batrachus in India. The same were recorded by Mehra (1930) from Clarias magur and Ramadevi (1973) from Clarias batrachus in India. Hunter (1927) placed the genus in subfamily of his own namely, Lytocestinae and retained only three species i.e. L adhaerens, L filiformis and L Indicus. He put the species L cunningtoni and chalmersius in the genus Monobothriodides. Subsequent workers Gupta (1969), Murhar (1963), have adhered to these changes. Wardle and McLeod (1952) followed Hunters classification but raised the status of Lytocestinae from Subfamily to a family. Wardle, McLeod and Radinovsky (1974) suggested new classification of Cestode, who used the term Cotyloda as a class. Mickiewicz (1972) included the species L javanicus Bovien (1926), Furtado (1963), Lynsdale (1956) and L parvulus Furtado (1963), in this genus. Johyi (1959) Considered L. alestesi as synonym of L birmanicus Lynsdale (1956), but Mickiewicz (1972) after examination of Original material L. alestesi Lynsdale (1956) conclude that, It should be considered a synonym of L. filiformis woodland (1923). Ramadevi (1973) described L. longicollis from Clarias batrachus in India. All the eight species come from East Asian countries. The present communication, deals with the description of a new species under the same genus, as Lytocestus mastacembellusi n. sp. collected from Mastacembellusi armatus, at Paitan, Dist. Aurangabad, M. S. India.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Young age pregnancy and postpartum blues incidences Kinetics And Stability Studies Of Formulated Micro/Nano Suspension Of Metronidazole Teachers’ Gender and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Studentsin Social Studies in Abakaliki-Nigeria Feministic Analysis of Manju Kapur’s A Married Woman A Two-Way Generalisation of The Chow Test: The General Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1