植物油生命周期评价注释

Guido Zemanek, G. Reinhardt
{"title":"植物油生命周期评价注释","authors":"Guido Zemanek, G. Reinhardt","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1521-4133(199909)101:9<321::AID-LIPI321>3.0.CO;2-D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renewable resources like vegetable oils constitute a central element in the discussion of the implementation of a sustainable development. Vegetable oils play an increasingly important part in the production of biodegradable materials. But considering the ecological effects of their production and use vegetable oils show advantages and disadvantages. Life-cycle assessments (LCAs) allow a detailed evaluation of their ecological performance. Carrying out LCAs the determination of the methodological proceedings is required. It is one of the objectives of the present study to ascertain if, or how strong, these methodological determinations can influence the results of LCAs. The LCA of refined rapeseed oil serves as an example. The following issues are of special interest here: the selection of a reference system, the balancing principles for coproducts, and the balancing principles for emissions under consideration of their site-specific impacts. Furthermore, the results for rapeseed oil and soybean oil are compared in order to find out if LCAs for different vegetable oils show similar results (which would allow the undiscriminate transfer of the LCA results from one oil to another). Finally, the LCA results of rapeseed oil, that have been obtained for the currently quantifiable parameters, are presented. As the study shows, the methodological approach can influence the LCA results significantly. Therefore, it is necessary to define and document the applied methodological approach carefully in order to base the LCA on verifiable facts and to obtain realistic results. The undiscriminate transfer of LCA results from one vegetable oil to another is not allowed because incorrect results are possible.","PeriodicalId":12304,"journal":{"name":"Fett-lipid","volume":"142 1","pages":"321-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notes on life‐cycle assessments of vegetable oils\",\"authors\":\"Guido Zemanek, G. Reinhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1521-4133(199909)101:9<321::AID-LIPI321>3.0.CO;2-D\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Renewable resources like vegetable oils constitute a central element in the discussion of the implementation of a sustainable development. Vegetable oils play an increasingly important part in the production of biodegradable materials. But considering the ecological effects of their production and use vegetable oils show advantages and disadvantages. Life-cycle assessments (LCAs) allow a detailed evaluation of their ecological performance. Carrying out LCAs the determination of the methodological proceedings is required. It is one of the objectives of the present study to ascertain if, or how strong, these methodological determinations can influence the results of LCAs. The LCA of refined rapeseed oil serves as an example. The following issues are of special interest here: the selection of a reference system, the balancing principles for coproducts, and the balancing principles for emissions under consideration of their site-specific impacts. Furthermore, the results for rapeseed oil and soybean oil are compared in order to find out if LCAs for different vegetable oils show similar results (which would allow the undiscriminate transfer of the LCA results from one oil to another). Finally, the LCA results of rapeseed oil, that have been obtained for the currently quantifiable parameters, are presented. As the study shows, the methodological approach can influence the LCA results significantly. Therefore, it is necessary to define and document the applied methodological approach carefully in order to base the LCA on verifiable facts and to obtain realistic results. The undiscriminate transfer of LCA results from one vegetable oil to another is not allowed because incorrect results are possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fett-lipid\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"321-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fett-lipid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4133(199909)101:9<321::AID-LIPI321>3.0.CO;2-D\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fett-lipid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4133(199909)101:9<321::AID-LIPI321>3.0.CO;2-D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

植物油等可再生资源是讨论实施可持续发展的核心要素。植物油在生物降解材料的生产中发挥着越来越重要的作用。但考虑到生态效应,其生产和使用植物油显示出优点和缺点。生命周期评估(lca)允许对其生态性能进行详细评估。在进行LCAs时,需要确定方法程序。本研究的目标之一是确定这些方法学决定因素是否或有多大程度上影响LCAs的结果。以精制菜籽油的LCA为例。以下问题在这里特别有意义:参考系统的选择、副产物的平衡原则和考虑到其特定场址影响的排放的平衡原则。此外,对菜籽油和大豆油的结果进行了比较,以确定不同植物油的LCA是否显示出相似的结果(这将允许LCA结果从一种油无差别地转移到另一种油)。最后给出了菜籽油在现有可量化参数下的LCA结果。研究表明,方法方法对LCA结果有显著影响。因此,有必要仔细定义和记录应用的方法方法,以便将LCA建立在可验证的事实基础上,并获得现实的结果。不允许不加区分地将LCA结果从一种植物油转移到另一种植物油,因为结果可能不正确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Notes on life‐cycle assessments of vegetable oils
Renewable resources like vegetable oils constitute a central element in the discussion of the implementation of a sustainable development. Vegetable oils play an increasingly important part in the production of biodegradable materials. But considering the ecological effects of their production and use vegetable oils show advantages and disadvantages. Life-cycle assessments (LCAs) allow a detailed evaluation of their ecological performance. Carrying out LCAs the determination of the methodological proceedings is required. It is one of the objectives of the present study to ascertain if, or how strong, these methodological determinations can influence the results of LCAs. The LCA of refined rapeseed oil serves as an example. The following issues are of special interest here: the selection of a reference system, the balancing principles for coproducts, and the balancing principles for emissions under consideration of their site-specific impacts. Furthermore, the results for rapeseed oil and soybean oil are compared in order to find out if LCAs for different vegetable oils show similar results (which would allow the undiscriminate transfer of the LCA results from one oil to another). Finally, the LCA results of rapeseed oil, that have been obtained for the currently quantifiable parameters, are presented. As the study shows, the methodological approach can influence the LCA results significantly. Therefore, it is necessary to define and document the applied methodological approach carefully in order to base the LCA on verifiable facts and to obtain realistic results. The undiscriminate transfer of LCA results from one vegetable oil to another is not allowed because incorrect results are possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ueber gegenwärtig gebräuchliche Methoden zur Bestimmung der Schmelz‐und Erstarrungstemperatur von Paraffin und Vorschlag zu einer einheitlichen Methode Zur Frage der Kunstbutter-Denaturirung Eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung von Harzöl in Mineralöl Kritische Lösungstemperaturen; eine neue Constante für die Analyse und Identificirung der Fettkörper, Kohlenwasserstoffe und ätherischen Oele Theorie und Praxis der chemischen Reinigung von Mineralölen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1